Categories
Sport

The Copa America remaining between Argentina and Brazil is feasible however extra magic from Lionel Messi might be required

Some people make a big fuss about Lionel Messi scoring 76 goals for Argentina, just one less than Pele’s total for Brazil, which is the record for South American players. Others are making a fuss over the prospect of Copa America glory that will make Messi another world player of the year. However, the man himself should not concern himself with any of the topics.

Messi only ever saw individual awards as a consequence of successful work in a collective context. It’s all about the team and now the team is Argentina more than ever in his career (and not just because, strictly speaking, he will no longer have a club after his Barcelona contract expires).

He could have been forgiven for throwing in the towel on international football after the turmoil of the 2018 Argentine World Cup season, which ended in the round of 16. Instead, he went all-in.

For years there has been a detached atmosphere around Messi and his self-contained manner is said to intimidate other Argentine players. But he has been different since the 2019 Copa; a loud, encouraging captain and leader who is integrated into the team as both a person and a footballer.

– Copa America bracket and fixture list
– Vickery: Superb Messi sends Argentina through

Messi works closely with midfielders Giovani Lo Celso and Rodrigo De Paul and develops a relationship with center forward Lautaro Martinez. A better team than ever since the 2016 Copa America Centenario, Argentina have reached the semifinals of the previous edition and are two games away from their first A title since 1993.

However, both games will be very difficult. Argentina will have to get past Colombia first on Tuesday and if they do they will face Brazil in Rio four days later unless there is a bigger shock in the other semifinals. In this scenario, the Albiceleste have to beat the last two teams they beat: two years ago, Colombia and Brazil won 2-0 each in the group stage and in the Copa semifinals.

Against Colombia, Messi and Co. have an epic battle with defensive midfielder Wilmar Barrios, one of the best man markers in the game. The 27-year-old has something of the young Javier Mascherano, who walks quickly over the floor, hard in duels, crisp in passing and loves nothing more than fighting.

Lionel Messi has four goals and four assists in the Copa America. Getty

The two nations met shortly before the start of the Copa in a World Cup qualifier in Colombia. Amazingly, Barrios started on the bench and Colombia gave way quickly, conceding two goals in the first eight minutes. They had to watch the game and risked opening the counterattack, but Barrios came at halftime.

While dealing with the danger by organizing things in front of their center-backs, Colombia was able to focus on the attack and leveled off with the last attack of the game, taking an important point on the road to Qatar in 2022 at the end and Colombia is for prepared for a repeat on Tuesday.

Coach Reinaldo Rueda appears to have given up having a playmaker and Edwin Cardona can only hope he will be kicked off the bench if Colombia follows the game. Barrios is therefore supported in the middle by another defensive midfielder, while Juan Guillermo Cuadrado returns after a suspension to play his double role on the right.

Luis Diaz will attack from the left and Duvan Zapata will lead a two-man front trying to harass a defense that threatened to run out in the quarter-finals against Ecuador when a 3-0 win over Argentina was slightly deceptive. They only scored three times in five games but Colombia will be quick, direct and physical.

1 relatives

In the other round of 16 game on Monday, hosts Brazil expect fewer obstacles against a Peruvian team, which lacks the outstanding Andre Carrillo, who was sent off a bit harshly in the quarter-finals after a heroic role against Paraguay.

There is considerable recent history between Brazil and Peru. Five years ago in Foxborough, Massachusetts, a 1-0 victory for Peru in the group stage of the Copa Centenario five years ago condemned Brazil to a humiliating exit, paving the way for Tite’s second term as coach of Dunga To take responsibility,

Peru has since won on American soil again – a test win from 1-0 in Los Angeles in September 2019 – but the competitive booty went to Brazil, which won two World Cup qualifiers and three Copa America wins in Lima: 5: 0 in the group phase and 3: 1 in the final two years ago and – most recently – a 4: 0 mauling in the first round of this tournament.

In the absence of Carrillo, it is hard to see how the Peruvians can stop this streak of defeat, not least because Brazil are on the rise after a disappointing quarter-final in which Tite clearly picked the wrong side against Chile.

His 4-4-2, with Gabriel Jesus and Richarlison outside and Neymar and Roberto Firmino in the middle, left the team outnumbered in midfield – the formation is more suitable for attacking games – but the introduction of an additional attacking midfielder by the coach in the Half-time solved the problem immediately when substitute Lucas Paqueta scored the only goal of the game.

Moments later, Gabriel Jesus was dismissed and his absence by suspension should make it easier to accommodate Paqueta from Monday night kick-off when Peru’s greatest ally appears to be the deplorable condition of the pitch at the Nilton Santos stadium in Rio de Janeiro .

Tite pleaded in vain to find another venue for the semifinals. CONMEBOL were terrified by the poor playing surfaces, however, and the Maracana was relocated ahead of Saturday’s final in hopes of creating a space worthy of a grand occasion with Neymar and Messi or maybe even Zapata.

Categories
Science

Klimasensitivität gegenüber CO2, was wissen wir? Teil 1. – Watt damit?

Von Andy May

Das IPCC behauptet in seinem AR5-Bericht, dass ECS, die langfristige Temperaturänderung aufgrund der Verdopplung der atmosphärischen CO2-Konzentration oder die „Gleichgewichtsklimasensitivität“, wahrscheinlich zwischen 1,5 und 4,5 °C liegt, und sie liefern keine beste Schätzung ( IPCC, 2013, S. 85). Aber ihr durchschnittliches ECS-Modell beträgt 3,2 °C/2xCO2. „°C/2xCO2“ ist hier die Temperaturänderung durch eine Verdoppelung von CO2. Sie behaupten auch, dass es äußerst unwahrscheinlich ist, unter 1 ° C zu liegen. ECS braucht lange, Hunderte von Jahren, um es zu erreichen, daher ist es unwahrscheinlich, dass es in der Natur beobachtet oder gemessen wird. Ein geeigneteres Maß für die Klimasensitivität ist TCR oder die transiente Klimareaktion oder Sensitivität. TCR kann weniger als 100 Jahre nach dem CO2-Anstieg beobachtet werden, der IPCC behauptet, dass dieser Wert wahrscheinlich zwischen 1° und 2,5°C/2xCO2 liegt, der vom Modell berechnete Durchschnitt beträgt 1,8°C/2xCO2 (IPCC, 2013, S. 818).

Der mit diesen Szenarien verbundene CO2-Klimaantrieb bzw. die Nettoänderung der von der Erdatmosphäre zurückgehaltenen Strahlung beträgt 3,7 W/m2 (IPCC, 2007b, S. 140). Unter Verwendung dieser Werte können wir eine Oberflächenlufttemperaturempfindlichkeit gegenüber Strahlungsantrieb (RF) von 1,8/3,7 = 0,49 °C pro W/m2 berechnen. Diese Werte beinhalten alle modellberechneten Rückmeldungen.

Der IPCC erklärt ausdrücklich, dass er die Rückkopplungen von Wolken, Wasserdampf und Albedo für positiv hält und behauptet sowohl Modell- als auch Beobachtungsbeweise dafür (IPCC, 2013, S. 82). Sie geben zu, dass Cloud-Feedback, insbesondere geringes Cloud-Feedback, schlecht eingeschränkt ist und die Quelle der meisten Streuung in Modellergebnissen ist (IPCC, 2013, S. 817). Cloud-Feedback wird kaum verstanden; aber es kann den gesamten geschätzten menschlichen Einfluss auf das Klima ausgleichen. Laut CERES-Satellitenmessungen schwankte die Netto-HF von Wolken in letzter Zeit von -13 bis -25 W/m2, wie in Abbildung 1 gezeigt. Beide Zahlen sind negativ, was bedeutet, dass die Wolken insgesamt die Erde kühlen. Wenn das IPCC behauptet, dass eine Verdoppelung von CO2 die HF an der Erdoberfläche um etwa 3,7 W/m2 erhöhen wird, ist dies weniger als die Veränderung der Wolken-HF von 2018-2019, 2007-2008, 2010-2011 oder 2005-2006. Weitere Informationen zu Wolken und globaler Erwärmung finden Sie hier.

Der IPCC möchte, dass wir uns über eine CO2-bedingte Veränderung in etwa 100 Jahren Sorgen machen, die wir in den letzten zwanzig Jahren aufgrund von Veränderungen der Wolkenbedeckung viermal erlebt haben. Ihre berechneten Auswirkungen der CO2-Verdoppelung sind im Vergleich zu natürlichen Veränderungen winzig. Die Unsicherheit bezüglich der Auswirkungen von CO2 auf das Klima ist der Unterschied zwischen zwei winzigen Zahlen, die beide zu klein sind, um sie zu messen. Man könnte vernünftigerweise davon ausgehen, dass eine Schraube locker ist.

Abbildung 1. Die globale Netto-Wolkenstrahlungswirkung auf die Erde.

Es ist erwähnenswert, dass der AR5-Bericht keine beste Schätzung des ECS liefert, da die verschiedenen Schätzungen nicht übereinstimmen. Es ist auch wichtig, dass sie der Meinung sind, dass die TCR sehr unwahrscheinlich über 3°C/2xCO2 liegt, aber sie bieten keine Untergrenze, auf die sie sich verlassen können. Eine Zusammenfassung der IPCC-Schätzungen von ECS und TCR ist in Kasten 12.2 dargestellt des AR5 (IPCC, 2013, S. 1110-1112).

Es gibt mehrere von Experten begutachtete Schätzungen der Klimasensitivität, die auf Beobachtungen in der realen Welt basieren und weniger als 1°C/2xCO2 betragen. Diese Schätzungen stehen im Mittelpunkt dieser Beiträge. Einige dieser Schätzungen beziehen sich auf ECS und einige auf TCR oder ähneln der Menge, die der IPCC als TCR bezeichnet. In diesem Beitrag werden wir nicht zwischen den beiden unterscheiden. Das IPCC hat spezifische modellbasierte Definitionen von ECS und TCR, die sich nicht in die reale Welt übertragen lassen. Hier konzentrieren wir uns auf reale Schätzungen, nicht auf abstrakte Modellkonstruktionen. Der IPCC versucht, diese niedrigeren Schätzungen zu ignorieren und behauptet, dass sie diskreditiert sind (IPCC, 2013, S. 923), wir halten dies für unangemessen.

Die niedrigeren Schätzungen stammen von Richard Lindzen (Lindzen & Choi, 2009), Sherwood Idso (Idso, 1998), Reginald Newell (Newell & Dopplick, 1979) und Willie Soon (Soon, Connolly & Connolly, 2015). Lindzens Schätzung liegt bei etwa 0,5 °C/2xCO2, Idsos Schätzung liegt bei 0,4 °C/2xCO2 und einer von Soon (er bietet vier an) ist 0,44 °C/2xCO2. Newell und Dopplick leiten 0,25°C/2xCO2 für die Tropen ab. Die Forscher verwenden eine Vielzahl von Datensätzen und Methoden, aber alle basieren auf Beobachtungen. Wir werden unten auf die Details eingehen und in einem zweiten Beitrag, der in ein oder zwei Tagen erscheinen wird.

Es gibt andere beobachtungsbasierte Schätzungen, wie die bekannte Schätzung von Nic Lewis und Judith Curry, die historische CO2- und globale Temperaturaufzeichnungen verwendet. Lewis und Curry schätzen den TCR auf 1,2 (5%-95% Bereich: 0,9-1,7) °C/2xCO2 (Lewis & Curry, 2018). Die Arbeit von Lewis und Curry ist ausgezeichnet, aber wir werden uns in diesem Beitrag auf die niedrigeren Schätzungen konzentrieren. Wir erwähnen ihre Arbeit nur, um zu zeigen, dass viele, wenn nicht die meisten beobachtungsbasierten Schätzungen der TCR niedriger sind als die modellbasierten Schätzungen. Modelle, die keine Beobachtungen verfolgen, sollten ignoriert werden.

Während AR5 die Arbeit von Lindzen und Choi anspricht, ignorieren sie die Schätzung von Idso aus dem Jahr 1998, die Schätzung von Newell und Dopplick aus dem Jahr 1979, und die Schätzung von Soon wurde noch nicht veröffentlicht.

Lindzen und Choi
In einer Reihe von Arbeiten haben Lindzen und seine Kollegen eine belastbare Hypothese entwickelt, dass steigende Meeresoberflächentemperaturen (SST) dazu führen, dass einige hohe tropische Zirruswolken verschwinden und den Himmel öffnen, damit mehr Infrarotstrahlung in den Weltraum entweichen kann und die tropische Atmosphäre kühlt und Oberfläche. Wie oben erwähnt, behauptet der IPCC, dass die Nettowolkenrückkopplung zu wärmeren Oberflächentemperaturen positiv ist und die Oberfläche weiter erwärmt. CERES sagt uns, dass die Gesamtwirkung von Wolken negativ ist, aber wie sich die Wolkenbedeckung mit der Oberflächentemperatur ändert, ist unklar. Lindzens Untersuchung dieses Problems ist aufschlussreich.

Die meisten tropischen Cirruswolken, aber nicht alle, stammen aus dem Oberlauf von Cumulonimbustürmen. Die Hypothese ist, dass höhere Oberflächentemperaturen die Niederschlagseffizienz innerhalb der Cumulonimbus-Türme sowie die Anzahl der Türme erhöhen, sodass in den Türmen weniger Wasserdampf zur Bildung von Zirruswolken zur Verfügung steht (Lindzen & Choi, 2021). Hochgradige Cirrus blockieren ausgehende Infrarotstrahlung, lassen jedoch die meisten eingehenden kurzwelligen Strahlungen ein, so dass die Reduzierung der von Cirrus bedeckten Fläche die Oberfläche kühlt.

Lindzen nennt die Verringerung der Zirruswolkenbedeckung aufgrund steigender Oberflächentemperaturen den „Iriseffekt“; da es analog zum Öffnen der Iris eines Auges ist. Dieses negative Feedback ist in den meisten Klimamodellen nicht enthalten, aber Thorsten Mauritsen und Bjorn Stevens fügten es ihrem ECHAM6-Klimamodell hinzu und stellten fest, dass die Modellergebnisse dadurch näher an die Beobachtungen heranrückten (Mauritsen & Stevens, 2015). Ein Anstieg der Oberflächentemperatur um ein Grad reduziert die Zirruswolkenbedeckung im tropischen Pazifik um 22%, ist also signifikant.

Das Standard-ECS, berechnet aus der ECHAM6-Modellausgabe, beträgt 2,8°C/2xCO2. Wenn dem Modell der Iriseffekt hinzugefügt wird, wird ECS immer kleiner und kann in einigen Szenarien auf 1,2 °C/2xCO2 fallen. Wie oben erwähnt, berechnete Lindzen einen ECS von 0,5°C/2xCO2 aus dem Cloud-Feedback-Parameter, der aus ERBE-Satellitendaten (Earth Radiation Budget Experiment) abgeleitet wurde. Die genaue Auswirkung des Iris-Effekts muss noch bestimmt werden, aber einmal integriert, senkt er immer sowohl TCR als auch ECS.

Trotz heftiger Kritik in den letzten 20 Jahren, darunter ein Artikel mit dem Titel „No Evidence for Iris“ im Bulletin der American Meteorological Society (Hartmann & Michelsen, 2002), wird der kühlende Iriseffekt heute allgemein akzeptiert. Was noch umstritten ist, ist das Ausmaß der Wirkung. Während das ECS theoretisch aus dem Gesamtfeedback berechnet werden kann, hat die Berechnung viele Unbekannte, die in Lindzens Veröffentlichungen beschrieben sind, insbesondere in der ersten im Jahr 2001 (Lindzen, Chou & Hou, 2001). Abhängig von den getroffenen Annahmen führt der Iriseffekt von Lindzen zu einem ECS zwischen den rein beobachtungsbasierten 0,5°C/2xCO2 (Lindzen & Choi, 2009) und den modellbasierten 2,5°C/2xCO2 (Mauritsen & Stevens, 2015). Obwohl der Bereich der möglichen Werte groß ist, sind sie alle kleiner als Berechnungen, die den Iriseffekt unter Verwendung derselben Annahmen ausschließen.

Lindzen betont, dass die Reaktion der Cirruswolke auf die SST-Erwärmung im Wesentlichen augenblicklich erfolgt, Daten mit einer Verzögerung von einem Monat oder mehr nicht verwendbar und irreführend sind. Es gibt auch andere Faktoren als SST, die die von Zirruswolken bedeckte Fläche beeinflussen und die Berechnung erschweren. Statistisch gesehen beträgt die langwellige Infrarot-(LW)-Rückkopplungsantwort auf den Iriseffekt zuverlässige -4 W/m2K-1. Das heißt, wenn der SST um ein Grad ansteigt, führt dies zu einer LW-HF-Kühlung von 4 Wm-2. Aber der Verlust von Wolken bedeutet auch, dass mehr kurzwellige Strahlung (SW) von der Sonne auf die Oberfläche trifft, so dass die Nettoabkühlung zweifelhaft ist. Die Abschätzungen der SW-Zunahme in Abhängigkeit von der Zirruswolkenbedeckung sind weniger genau als die Kühlwirkung des entweichenden LW, aber wahrscheinlich zwischen 3 und 3,5 W/m2K-1. Das genaue Ausmaß der Kühlung durch den Iriseffekt bleibt also unbekannt, aber es besteht allgemeine Übereinstimmung darüber, dass der Iriseffekt existiert, zu einer Kühlung führt und ECS und TCR reduziert.

Bald, et al., 2015
Niemand weiß genau, wie sich die Oberflächentemperatur der Erde mit der Sonneneinstrahlung ändert. Genau wie das Wetter ändert sich der Energiefluss an der Spitze der Atmosphäre, so dass langfristige kleine Änderungen, sei es aufgrund von Veränderungen der Sonne oder der CO2-Konzentration, durch kurzfristige natürliche Schwankungen verdeckt werden. Ebenso weist die Aufzeichnung der Oberflächentemperatur Messprobleme auf, sowohl systematische Probleme als auch Instrumentenprobleme.

Willie Soon und Kollegen befürchteten, dass die Urbanisierung das globale Temperaturnetzwerk kontaminiert haben könnte, und erstellten daher mithilfe überwiegend ländlicher Wetterstationen eine Aufzeichnung der Temperatur der nördlichen Hemisphäre (NH) (Soon, Connolly & Connolly, 2015). Ihr neuer Rekord war kompatibel mit NH SST-Trends und Aufzeichnungen von Gletschervorstößen und -rückgängen. Der Rekord wurde mit einem NH SST-Rekord kombiniert und mit der von Scafetta und Willson modifizierten Hoyt und Schatten TSI (Total Solar Irradiance) Rekonstruktion verglichen (Scafetta & Willson, 2014). Das Match war ziemlich gut, wie Sie in Abbildung 2 sehen können.

Abbildung 2. Soon, et al. Temperaturaufzeichnung für den ländlichen Raum der nördlichen Hemisphäre (in blau) im Vergleich zum TSI (in rot). Quelle: (Bald, Connolly & Connolly, 2015).

Die Anpassung nach der Methode der kleinsten Quadrate der Kurven in Abbildung 2 führt zu einem Satz von Residuen, der recht klein ist. Der R2 beträgt 0,48 bis 0,5 und die Steigungen betragen 0,1 bis 0,211 °C/Wm-2. Soon und Kollegen gingen davon aus, dass die durch die TSI-Änderung unerklärliche Temperaturschwankung auf eine Erhöhung der CO2-Konzentration zurückzuführen sei und je nach Berechnungsmethode zu einer Klimasensitivität zwischen 0,44°C/2xCO2 und 1,76°C/2xCO2 . führte (Bald, Connolly & Connolly, 2015).

Die in Abbildung 2 gezeigte TSI-Rekonstruktion ähnelt vielen anderen, wie in Soon et al. gezeigt, aber das IPCC ignoriert im Allgemeinen die aktiveren TSI-Rekonstruktionen und bevorzugt unveränderlichere Rekonstruktionen, die den Anschein erwecken, dass CO2 der dominante Faktor bei der jüngsten Erwärmung ist . Der entscheidende Punkt ist, dass die Klimamodelle auf die verschiedenen globalen Temperaturaufzeichnungen abgestimmt sind, die sehr wohl durch die rasante Urbanisierung im 20. Jahrhundert belastet sein können. Die abgestimmten IPCC-Modelle der natürlichen Erwärmung gehen von einer nahezu unveränderlichen Sonne aus. Wenn also die rein natürlich modellierte Temperatur vom anthropogenen plus natürlichen Modell abgezogen wird, um die menschliche (oder CO2) Komponente der Erwärmung zu extrahieren, wird die gesamte Erwärmung dem Menschen und CO2 . zugeordnet . Dieser IPCC-Prozess wird hier beschrieben. Der Beitrag zeigt auch Plots verschiedener von Experten begutachteter TSI-Rekonstruktionen, die vom IPCC verwendet und von ihnen ignoriert werden.

Schlussfolgerungen
In diesem Beitrag vergleichen wir die IPCC-Sicht der Klimasensitivität mit zwei modernen beobachtungsbasierten Schätzungen, die niedriger sind. Insbesondere das untere Ende der Spannen, das Lindzen, Soon und ihre Kollegen berechnen, ist viel niedriger als die untere Schätzung des IPCC, basiert jedoch auf vernünftigen Annahmen und Beobachtungen.

Im nächsten Beitrag werden wir uns ältere, aber immer noch gültige, beobachtungsbasierte Schätzungen der Klimasensitivität ansehen. Der nächste Beitrag wird auch Schätzungen der Empfindlichkeit der Oberflächenlufttemperatur gegenüber Strahlungsantrieben untersuchen. Ein Hauptpunkt ist, dass die Auswirkungen einer Verdoppelung des CO2 im Vergleich zu natürlichen Veränderungen gering sind. Wie Sie in Abbildung 2 sehen können, können sehr kleine Änderungen der Solarleistung von 4 W/m2 oder 0,3% von 1361 W/m2 fast so viel bewirken wie das gesamte vom Menschen in die Atmosphäre emittierte CO2. Die ebenfalls beobachteten Veränderungen der Wolken-RF in den Zeiträumen: 2018-2019, 2007-2008, 2010-2011 oder 2005-2006 sind größer als die Auswirkungen des vom Menschen emittierten CO2. Die Auswirkungen von CO2 auf das Klima sind zu gering, um sie zu messen, daher streiten wir und geraten in Panik über etwas, das wahrscheinlich keine Rolle spielt.

Laden Sie hier die Bibliographie herunter.

So was:

Mögen Wird geladen…

Categories
Health

Pope Francis undergoes colon surgical procedure in Rome hospital

Pope Francis waves during his weekly general audience in the Paul VI hall at the Vatican on October 14, 2020.

Alberto Pizzoli | AFP | Getty Images

Pope Francis had surgery in a Rome hospital on Sunday for an abnormal narrowing of his large intestine, the Vatican said.

Francis, who is 84, “reacted well to the operation,” according to a statement issued by Matteo Bruni, director of the Holy See’s press office.

The surgery at A. Gemelli Polyclinic was performed under general anesthesia by Dr. Sergio Alifieri.

Bruni earlier in the day announced that the pope would undergo a “scheduled surgery for a symptomatic diverticular stenosis of the colon.”

Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

The announcement that Francis was entering the hospital came just hours after the pope made a public appearance before crowds in St. Peter’s Square.

A week ago, at the same regular appearance there, Francis had asked people for special prayers for himself. During that same event, he announced plans to visit Hungary and Slovakia in September.

The Argentina-born Roman Catholic pontiff was elected as the first pope from the Americas in February 2013.

He succeeded German-born Benedict XVI, who retired because of advancing age.

Categories
Entertainment

Renée Zellweger and Ant Anstead noticed collectively for the primary time

Renée Zellweger and Ant Anstead made their unofficial public debut as a couple.

On the weekend of July 4th, the 52-year-old Oscar-winning actress and 42-year-old British television personality were hanging out at his new oceanfront home in Laguna Beach, California. His boy joined them Hudson London Anstead, the 20-month-old son he shares with ex-wife and flip or flop star Christina Haack.

On Friday July 2nd, Renée and Ant were photographed alone on his balcony, which overlooks a public street and the sea. It was the first time the two had been seen together since last month it was reported that the two had dated after meeting while filming an episode of the new Discovery + show Celebrity IOU: Joyride.

On the balcony, the couple dressed casually, the actress wearing her hair in a loose ponytail and holding a mug that said “Home Is Where Dad Is”.

On Sunday July 4th, Renée and Ant were photographed walking together in Laguna Beach, this time with his son he was carrying. The actress wore a purple top and orange baseball cap for her outing.

Categories
Science

NASA Continues to Attempt to Rescue Failing Hubble

Things are not looking very good for the Hubble Space Telescope right now. On Sunday, June 13th, the telescope’s payload computer suddenly stopped working, prompting the main computer to put the telescope into safe mode. While the telescope itself and its science instruments remain in working order, science operations have been suspended until the operations team can figure out how to get the payload computer back online.

While attempting to restart the computer, the operations team has also tried to trace the issue to specific components in the payload computer and switch to their backup modules. As of June 30th, the team began looking into the Command Unit/Science Data Formatter (CU/SDF) and the Power Control Unit (PCU). Meanwhile, NASA is busy preparing and testing procedures to switch to backup hardware if either of these components are the culprit.

The payload computer is part of the Science Instrument Command and Data Handling (SI C&DH) unit, where it is responsible for controlling and coordinating the scientific instruments aboard the spacecraft. The current issues began when the main computer stopped receiving the “keep-alive” signal from the payload computer – which lets the main computer know that everything is working.

The Hubble Space Telescope being released from the cargo bay of the Space Shuttle Discovery in 1990. Credit: NASA

That’s when the operations team began investigating different pieces of hardware on the SI C&DH as the possible source. Based on the available data, the team initially thought that the problem was due to a degrading memory module and tried to switch to one of the module’s multiple backups – but met with failure. On the evening of Thursday, June 17th, another attempt was made to bring both modules back online, but these attempts also led to failure.

At that point, they began looking into other possibles sources of the shutdown, like the Standard Interface (STINT) hardware. This component is responsible for bridging communications between the computer’s Central Processing Module (CPM), which they began investigating as well. Now, the team is investigating the Command Unit/Science Data Formatter (CU/SDF) and a power regulator within the Power Control Unit (PCU).

Whereas the CU/SDF sends and formats commands and data while the PCU is designed to ensure a steady voltage supply to the payload computer’s hardware. If either of these systems is responsible for the shutdown, then the team must once again go through an operations procedure to switch to the backup units. This time, however, the procedure is more complex and risky than the ones the team executed last time.

Mainly, switching to the backup CU/SDF or backup power regulator requires that several other hardware boxes need to be switched to their backups because of the way they are connected to the SI C&DH unit. The last time the operations team performed this task was back in 2008, which was the last time the CU/SDF module failed. This is what prompted the final servicing mission in 2009, which replaced the entire SI C&DH unit.

Astronaut Mike Good working to repair the Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) during the final Hubble servicing mission in May 2009. Credit: NASA

Given the complexity of switching multiple systems over to their backups, the operations team is currently reviewing and updating all of Hubble‘s operations procedures, commands, and all other items relating to switching to backup hardware. When they are finished (expected for next week) the team will run a high-fidelity simulator to test their plan of execution and see if they can pull it off.

Since Hubble first launched in 1990, it has taken over 1.5 million images, and more than 600,000 of those were taken since its last servicing mission in 2009. These images are some of the most breathtaking views of the Universe ever taken and have led to substantial discoveries about the nature of our Universe. Here at home, it has deepened our understanding of the Kuiper Belt and Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) like Pluto and Eris.

In 2014, it also observed the farthest object to ever be visited by a spacecraft – the Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) Arrokoth, which the New Horizons mission made a close pass with on Jan. 1st, 2019. It also observed aurora in the atmospheres of Jupiter, and Saturn, as well as Jupiter’s moon Ganymede. Hubble is also responsible for providing the data that led astronomers to conclude that Ganymede likely contains a large saltwater ocean in its interior.

Beyond the Solar System, Hubble has aided in the first atmospheric studies of exoplanets, helped constrain the size and mass of the Milky Way, the evolution of galaxies over time, revealed the accelerating expansion of the Universe (leading to the theory of Dark Energy), and aided in the study of Dark Matter. These and other accomplishments are all part of Hubble‘s legacy as it celebrates being in space for 31 years, 2 months, and either days.

I think I speak for everyone when I wish Hubble a speedy recovery and hope it has a few more years left in her!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0P2-qcos90

Further Reading: NASA

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Sport

ESPN’s Rachel Nichols directed variety feedback to Maria Taylor, inflicting a stir in society

NBA reporter Rachel Nichols sparked significant internal turmoil at ESPN after unwittingly including her comment that colleague Maria Taylor moderated coverage of the 2020 NBA final because ESPN “felt the pressure” to be more diverse.

According to a Sunday New York Times report, Nichols, who is white, made comments in July 2020 ahead of the final between the Lakers and Heat, a series that Nichols anticipated and that took place amid nationwide protests against systemic racism and police brutality. ESPN picked Taylor, who is black, for the assignment.

According to The Times, Nichols made the comments in a phone call with Lebron James’ advisor Adam Mendelsohn and his agent Rich Paul. Nichols unwittingly filmed their conversation using company-provided equipment and uploaded it to ESPN’s servers. Dozens of employees were reportedly exposed to the video as part of their regular workflow. At least one person recorded the video with their mobile phone and passed it on to other employees; it finally reached executives within hours.

MORE: NBA Finals 2021 schedule, times, TV channels and live streams to watch Bucks vs. Suns

“I wish Maria Taylor all the success in the world – she reports on football, she reports on basketball,” said Nichols on the call. “If you have to give her more to do because you are feeling pressure because of your shitty long-term record in terms of diversity – which, by the way, I know personally from the female side – then do it. Just find it somewhere else. You won’t find it from me or take my thing away.

“I just want them to go somewhere else – that’s in my contract, by the way; this job is written on my contract, ”said Nichols Mendelsohn a few minutes later on the call.

ESPN did not punish Nichols for her comments, an action some ESPN staff told The Times was “an active source of pain” and discussion.

Nichols’ comments and ESPN’s refusal to reprimand them created a tense work environment at ESPN in which many black Times staff said it confirmed that many “outwardly supportive whites talk differently behind closed doors.” The Times, which purchased a copy of the video, reports that Mendelsohn also said in the video, “I don’t know. I am exhausted. I have nothing left between Me Too and Black Lives Matter. “

The Times reported that Taylor nearly refused to cover the 2020 final in an email to ESPN executives, including President Jimmy Pitaro. The email is dated about two weeks after Nichols uploaded her conversation.

“I’m not going to call myself a victim, but I have certainly felt bullied and I feel like my complaints were not taken seriously,” Taylor wrote in an email to ESPN executives, including Pitaro. “In fact, after two incidents of racial insensitivity, it was the first time I heard from Human Resources that I asked if I had released Rachel’s tape to the media. I would never do that. “

Taylor reconsidered a few days later, and told ESPN that she would continue hosting “NBA Countdown” during the playoffs while Nichols was on the show. ESPN agreed to the condition, but reportedly immediately violated it by making Nichols appear on the show in brief sections where she did not interact with Taylor.

That setup further added tensions in the 2020-21 NBA season, with Nichols reporting from the sidelines for ESPN’s key games. To keep her and Taylor from interacting on “NBA Countdown,” Nichols’ appearances on the show were taped but shown live. Other segments of sideline reporters have been a mix of live and pre-recorded.

Prior to the 2021 NBA playoffs, ESPN threatened no live performances by supporting cast members if Taylor refused to interact with Nichols, which according to some ESPN staff would have wrongly punished everyone but Nichols to keep her position.

The Times reported that a call from “NBA Countdown” on May 22nd before the show turned bitter, with commentators Jalen Rose, Adrian Wojnarowski and Jay Williams along with several other show staff saying the move benefited Nichols at the expense of others. ESPN’s decision not to let other side reporters appear on the show only affected women of color: Lisa Salters, Cassidy Hubbarth and Malika Andrews, all of whom reportedly received minor assignments. Wojnarowski reportedly jumped in on the call to describe Nichols as a “bad teammate”.

(According to people familiar with the situation, the restrictions were lifted later on the day after Pitaro spoke with Taylor and Wojnarowski – Wojnarowski alone at the time – to see if lifting them would help resolve the issue).

In addition, only one person was specifically punished for Nichols ‘comments: digital video producer Kayla Johnson, who reportedly told ESPN Human Resources that she sent the video of Nichols’ comments to Taylor. She was suspended for two weeks without pay. Johnson recently left ESPN and did not comment on his story to The Times.

Nichols responded to questions from the Times that she “dumped a friend about the ESPN process, not Maria. My own intentions in this conversation and the opinion of those responsible at ESPN are not the sum of what matters here – if Maria found the conversation disturbing, then that was it, and I was the reason for it. “

Nichols also said she tried to apologize to Taylor via text and phone. “Maria chose not to respond to these offers, which is completely fair and a decision I respect.”

“We will of course not comment on the details of a commentary contract,” said Josh Krulewitz, an ESPN spokesman. Krulewitz declined to make Pitaro available for an interview.

Taylor, whose ESPN contract ends on July 20, declined to tell the Times about his story.

Categories
Science

NASA Rocket, Satellite tv for pc Tag-Workforce to View the Big Electrical Present within the Sky – Watts Up With That?

From NASA

Some 50 miles up, where Earth’s atmosphere blends into space, the air itself hums with an electric current. Scientists call it the atmospheric dynamo, an Earth-sized electric generator. It’s taken hundreds of years for scientists to lay the groundwork to understand it, but the principles that keep it running are only just now being revealed in detail. 

Following up on its predecessor’s 2013 flight, the Dynamos, Winds, and Electric Fields in the Daytime Lower Ionosphere-2, or Dynamo-2, sounding rocket mission will soon pierce the atmospheric winds thought to keep the dynamo churning. With the sounding rocket’s launch timed as NASA’s Ionospheric Connection Explorer satellite passes nearby, these two space missions will combine their perspectives to advance our understanding of the giant electric circuit in the sky. See below for information on how to stream the launch and where it will be visible in person.

The Dynamo mission

The atmospheric dynamo is a pattern of electrical current swirling in continent-sized circuits high above our heads. Driven by the Sun, it migrates across the planet, centered wherever the Sun is directly overhead. It comes alive in Earth’s ionosphere, a layer of the atmosphere where the Sun’s intense radiation separates electrons from their atoms, allowing electricity to flow.

A map of the ionospheric currents at the time of Dynamo 1’s launch on July 4, 2013. Currents – whose intensity is marked by red and blue coloring – travel in opposite directions on either side of the magnetic equator, marked with a pink line. The yellow dots are magnetometer readings from the ground.Credits: NASA/JAXA/R. Pfaff et al

Most measurements of the dynamo come from magnetometers on the ground, which monitor how that current disturbs Earth’s magnetic field (think of them as souped-up compasses). Ground-based measurements have their advantages – they can monitor one location for long periods of time, for instance. But to really see what’s going on in detail, you have to make measurements from inside the ionosphere, right where the electric current flows.

“It’s a really tricky part of space to get measurements, because the air is much too thin for an aircraft, and yet it’s still too dense to fly most spacecraft,” said Scott England, space physicist at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg and collaborator for the upcoming Dynamo-2 campaign. “So one way of making these measurements is to fly a rocket through it.”

Sounding rockets, named for the nautical term “to sound,” meaning to measure, launch to make brief measurements in space before falling back to Earth a few minutes later. They excel at reaching hard-to-access regions of space that are too low for satellites to measure and too high to reach with scientific balloons – and they’re ideal for comparing wind speeds at different altitudes, since they slice through the atmosphere near-vertically.

A picture of the rocket plumes shortly after the launch of both Dynamo rockets from Wallops Flight Facility on July 4, 2013.Credits: NASA/JAXA/R. Pfaff et al/Ken Kramer

“While ground-based methods can provide large-scale, integrated measurements, sounding rockets give us local, fine-scale data on the ionospheric current,” said Takumi Abe, space physicist at the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA, and collaborator for the Dynamo missions. “That’s when we use sounding rockets – when we’d like to see the small-scale physics.”

The first Dynamo mission – comprising scientists from NASA, JAXA, and several U.S. universities – launched their rockets on the 4th of July, 2013, from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island, Virginia. The team divided their instruments between two rockets, the first measuring electric fields while the second, launched just 15 seconds later, traced the winds, leaving behind a cloudy plume that glistened red in the sunlight similar to those observed in firework shows.

Observing from the ground and from a NASA aircraft, the team watched the crimson clouds morph in the wind as simultaneous electric field measurements were beamed back to the ground.

The vapor trail teased about in the wind, twisting and curling into a spiraling zig-zag. The telltale shape meant the winds were changing direction along the rocket’s flight path.

“They moved first to the east, and then a few miles above, they’re all moving to the west, and a few miles above, they’re all moving back to the east,” England said.

The zig-zag confirmed one aspect of the theory of atmospheric tides, which create high-altitude winds thought to drive the atmospheric dynamo. Heat from the ground below radiates up in waves, forcing parts of the atmosphere to move back and forth like the ebb and flow of ocean waves as they hit the beach.

“The zig-zag is the signature of this huge wave moving through this region,” England added.

Though the winds were expected by theory, their strength was not.

Based on magnetometer readings from the ground at the time, the team expected a weak current and mild winds above. Indeed, things were calm below the ionosphere’s base. But right where the reddish cloud trail pierced the lower parts of the ionosphere, where the dynamo is strongest, it was rapidly smeared across the sky.

“Just in the dynamo region, the wind suddenly takes off and gets very fast, over 150 meters per second (335 miles per hour),” said Rob Pfaff, space physicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and principal investigator for both Dynamo missions. “It’s much stronger than what’s predicted.”

These oppositely directed, high-speed winds were too fine-grained to be detected from ground-based measurements.

“It might look from the ground like the wind is going east at a very low speed,” said England. “But it turns out that’s a very high speed to the east and a slightly lower speed to the west, averaged together.”

A satellite and rocket tag-team

Though the 2013 observations from the Dynamo rockets were surprising, they jibe with newer measurements from NASA’s Ionospheric Connection Explorer, or ICON, satellite.

ICON, a satellite mission launched in October 2019, flies at an altitude of about 360 miles, looking down on the same ionospheric winds that Dynamo rockets measured from within. Lately, ICON had also observed much faster winds than expected by theory, and the team didn’t know what to make of them.

“Having the verification by these rocket results that what we’re seeing with ICON is real – it’s even sharper than what we can see,” said England, who is the project scientist for the ICON mission.

ICON’s wind measurements aren’t as high resolution as the Dynamo rockets’ were, but it can see much broader swaths of space, and can repeat those observations on each orbit. The Dynamo-2 mission campaign will combine their strengths.

“We are going to time it so that ICON is flying past around the same time that rocket is launching,” England said. “That way we can really combine all the amazing strengths in the data that’s highlighted in this paper with the larger picture view from ICON.”

Illustration of NASA’s Ionospheric Connection Explorer, or ICON. ICON explores Earth’s upper atmosphere and ionosphere, a region influenced by both terrestrial weather and changes in near-Earth space.Credits: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab

The first Dynamo rockets launched together around noon, when the current was flowing from east to west. This time, the Dynamo-2 rockets will likely launch at different times, in the morning and afternoon, to capture the current when it is flowing in different directions.

“We’re going to take measurements in the morning and in the afternoon to complete the circle, so to speak, and see how all this comes together in one big picture,” Pfaff said.

However, Pfaff may instead launch one rocket during geomagnetically “quiet” times and one during “disturbed” times, when the ionosphere’s activity is especially complex, which would provide equally valuable insight. Which plan they follow will depend on how solar activity and the dynamo currents themselves are looking in real time once the launch window opens.

The Dynamo-2 rockets will also use a novel instrument developed by co-investigator Jim Clemmons at the University of New Hampshire in Durham. The instrument measures winds by monitoring pressure gradients in the air around the rockets instead of releasing clouds that must be tracked from the ground or sky.

“And the beauty of that is we don’t have to rely on clear skies and we don’t have to get an airplane in the air – we can just do it,” Pfaff said.

Pfaff hopes the new results will help the team understand what’s driving the unduly fast winds, and what the consequences are for understanding the atmospheric dynamo.

Discovering the dynamo in the sky

The atmospheric dynamo is so named because it operates with the same principles as the electric dynamo, a kind of electric generator. The first dynamo was not found in nature but rather constructed in a lab.

In the early 1800s, on the cusp of the Victorian era in Britain, fascination with electricity was reaching a fever pitch as reports of fundamental discoveries arrived from across Europe. The invention of the battery, the discovery of electrical current, and several puzzling effects relating electricity to magnetism were related on a nearly monthly basis.

Michael Faraday – a bookbinder’s apprentice turned self-taught experimentalist – was toiling in his London lab, working on a strange new device that, though he didn’t know it, would eventually change the world.

Faraday’s sketch of his first dynamo machine.Credits: © The Royal Society

It consisted of a copper disc, mounted like a bicycle wheel so as to spin between two magnets. He connected the disc to an instrument that measured electric current, invented just 10 years earlier.

Faraday rotated the disc and the needle on his instrument wiggled – a small electric current was beginning to flow. Historians would later identify this moment – October 28, 1831, according to his diary – as the first time humans turned motion into electricity. Faraday had discovered electrical induction, and as a bonus, built the first dynamo, or electric generator. It was the prototype of a technology that today keeps our lights on, our computers running, and the entire modern economy afloat.

What made Faraday’s device work were three key ingredients: a magnetic field (created by the two magnets), a conductor (the copper disc), and motion. Combining those three, he had discovered that moving a conductive material within a stationary magnetic field – or moving a magnetic field around a stationary conductor – will start an electric current flowing.

Eventually, scientists discovered each of those three ingredients operating on Earth at a much larger scale.

The atmospheric dynamo, one piece at a time

Of the three components of the atmospheric dynamo – a magnetic field, a conductor, and motion – Earth’s magnetic field was discovered first.

By the early 1100s, Chinese seafarers were already using magnetic compasses to navigate on cloudy, starless nights, though the reason for their reliable alignment wasn’t known. William Gilbert’s De Magnete, published in London in 1600, was the first to explain this behavior with the idea that the Earth itself was a giant magnet.

Astronomers began mapping Earth’s magnetic field, and by 1701, English astronomer Edmond Halley, charting the Atlantic with his compass, produced the first map of Earth’s magnetic field.

First map of Earth’s magnetic field based on compass readings, by Edmond Halley, after sailing the Atlantic Ocean on the Paramore. Since we now know Earth’s magnetic pole shifts over time, these lines are not stable – scientists update the World Magnetic Model every five years. As of 2019, the magnetic north is moving towards Siberia at a rate of about 34 miles (55 km) per year.Credits: E. Halley/Princeton Library Historic Maps Collection

As compasses gained wider use for scientific purposes, some observers noticed an irregularity: compass readings seemed to flicker on a daily schedule.

“Ever since the 19th century, people would observe, particularly near noon, this little wiggle on these really big compasses,” said Pfaff.

The wiggling compass needles fit well with new findings on the relationship between electricity and magnetism. In 1820, Danish scientist Hans Christian Ørsted had observed that running an electric current through a conductive wire deflected the needle of a nearby compass, effectively “wiggling” the magnetic field it sensed. Faraday’s dynamo machine, constructed 11 years later, showed how a wiggling magnetic field could induce a current. Magnetic fields, motion, and electricity – the three went together. If that was right, then the wiggling compass needles on Earth might mean that somehow, an electric current was running overhead. But where that current was coming from, and the conductor it was traveling through, was far from clear.

In 1882, English scientist Balfour Stewart penned an Encyclopedia Brittanica entry that correctly identified the source, though it was conjecture at the time. A part of the upper atmosphere itself, he wrote, might be conductive – the air above us could become electrified.

That conductive part of the atmosphere was eventually discovered through practical experience. As World War I created a need for long-distance radio communication, experimenters discovered that radio signals could travel between continents – around the curvature of the Earth – by somehow bouncing off of the sky. The only viable explanation for their success was a reflective – that is, conductive – layer of the atmosphere.

Figure 1 from Appleton’s Nobel Prize lecture in 1947, demonstrating how a radio wave can travel long distances by reflecting off an ionized layer of the atmosphere.Credits: ©The Nobel Foundation

In 1927, English physicist Edward Appleton studied those radio signals to confirm that there was indeed an electrically conductive layer of the atmosphere. (He called it the “E-layer,” for “electrically conductive”.) Over the following decades, several more sublayers of what became known as the ionosphere – where Earth’s atmosphere contains substantial populations of charged particles, ions and electrons – would be discovered and characterized. The second component of Earth’s atmospheric dynamo, the conductive ionosphere, had been found.

Still, the current didn’t seem to be flowing constantly. The wiggling compass needles only twitched occasionally, most strongly at noon. Something must be moving the ionosphere strongest when the Sun was right overhead.

The discovery of the final component of the atmospheric dynamo, the source of motion, would have to wait for the space age, when rockets, balloons, and early satellites could measure atmospheric winds. In 1970, systematizing two decades of data, space physicists Sydney Chapman and Richard Lindzen developed the theory of atmospheric tides, the key to the ionosphere’s pulsing currents.

The idea was that as the Sun beats down on Earth, its heat radiates back upwards. In response, the entire atmosphere expands. A high-flying observer would experience this expansion as strong gusts of wind.

When those winds reach the base of the ionosphere, where the Sun’s radiation separates neutral particles into electrically charged ions and electrons, they push them along too. As a result, the ionosphere – a conductor – moves against Earth’s magnetic field, swishing to and fro with the wind.

“With these key ingredients together, the force of the wind pushing on those ions and electrons in the presence of Earth’s magnetic field, we can get a current flowing in the Earth’s upper atmosphere,” said England. “That’s what we call the dynamo.”

“We’ve come a long way since Faraday’s time,” Pfaff said. “After two centuries of research, it is exciting to journey into space and observe dynamos that are part of our natural environment.”

The Dynamo-2 rockets will launch from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility on Wallops Island, Virginia between July 6-20. The two rockets will not be launched on the same day. The launch window on July 6 runs from 12:15 p.m. to 2 p.m. EDT. On July 7-13, the launch window runs from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. EDT and from 8 a.m. to noon EDT on July 14-20. Live coverage of the launches will begin 20 minutes before the opening of the launch window on the Wallops YouTube site. The NASA Visitor Center at Wallops will not be open for this mission. The launches may be visible in the mid-Atlantic region.

By Miles Hatfield
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.Last Updated: Jul 2, 2021Editor: Miles Hatfield

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Entertainment

Brandy apparently confirms the upcoming collaboration between her and JoJo

Roomies, what do you call it when nostalgia and singing collide? Well, in the case of Brandy and JoJo, we’ll have to wait and see! JoJo posted a photo next to Brandy with the headline “Hi Queen”. In response, Brandy slipped into her comment section to announce an upcoming collaboration!

“I can’t wait for people to see what we have in store,” Brandy wrote. “You are so special to me and the music. We are so happy that we had the opportunity to connect. “

In her words, Brandy gives just enough to make everyone wonder what exactly this couple has in store for fans. While both ladies are known to knock down with singing, the photo posted gives no indication that the collaboration had anything to do with music. In fact, it’s hard to tell when this photo was taken, but Brandy’s Connect comment could mean it was a recent link.

In the photo, Brandy is wearing a black, patterned long-sleeved blouse. She is shown smiling with her hair straightened. In the meantime, JoJo has opted for lighter colors in their fit. She wore a buttoned white polka dot blouse with a bright orange tank top underneath. JoJo equipped with a small necklace. By Saturday, the photo had received over 105,000 likes on Instagram.

Meanwhile, fans can look forward to Brandy’s confirmed project “Queens”. She was cast to star in the ABC drama pilot as a member of a fictional 90s hip hop group. She has worked with big names like Eve, Naturi Naughton and Nadine Velazquez.

Last year we reported exclusively on an excerpt from a collaboration between JoJo and Tory Lanez. The song titled “Comeback” came from JoJo, who fantasized about the intensity of sleeping with her ex. The singer picked Tory as the first choice for the feature and said, “I sent him the song and he raised the stake by putting in a verse that exceeded my expectations.”

Would you like updates straight to your text inbox? Call us at 917-722-8057 or click here to join!

Categories
Sport

Lionel Messi sends Argentina into Copa America semifinals as Colombia pip Uruguay

The quarterfinal phase of the controversial Copa America is now complete. Four teams remain standing as the games roll on at empty stadiums across the country. Argentina easily accounted for Ecuador 3-0, while Colombia needed penalties to beat Uruguay after a 0-0 draw in normal time.

ESPN looks back at the action from the oldest international tournament in the world.

– Copa America bracket and fixtures schedule

A strange reunion for Messi

Hernan Galindez is a 34-year-old from Argentina who, over the course of this Copa America, has become Ecuador’s first choice goalkeeper. He is the same age and from the same place as Lionel Messi. Galindez was a striker in youth football, and proudly records that when he changed position, the first goal he conceded was scored by Messi.

The last goal he conceded was also scored by Messi — a stoppage time free kick that flew past him from the edge of the area and gave Saturday’s quarterfinal a 3-0 scoreline that is perhaps not a fair reflection of the game.

For the previous 92 minutes Messi had not managed to beat Galindez, though he did see one shot come back off the inside of the post. Even so, Messi had made the difference, taking the keeper out with two superb passes that set up the goals that decided an intriguing game.

Galindez was not the only Argentine that Argentina had to get past. There was also Ecuador coach Gustavo Alfaro, a calmly skillful organiser of counterattacking sides. Alfaro’s team forced Argentina to show many of their virtues — and managed to highlight some of their defects.

The chief virtue is the circuit of midfield passing, with Messi well integrated and combining well with both Giovani Lo Celso and Rodrigo De Paul, while behind them Leandro Paredes organises the first ball out of defence. Ecuador worked hard to interrupt the circuit, pressing in midfield and defending high — and so Argentina demonstrated that they could also be more direct, hitting long to centre-forward Lautaro Martinez or moving the ball quickly behind Alfaro’s defensive line. This was how the first goal came — Galindez had been drawn out to block a shot, and Messi played a wonderful diagonal pass to cut him out of the game and give De Paul the chance to shoot home.

Lionel Messi pulled the strings as Argentina beat Ecuador in Saturday’s Copa America quarterfinal. Alexandre Schneider/Getty Images

Argentina, then, had got off to their customary fast start. But it was always likely that Ecuador’s pace on the break would cause them problems. Twice in the first half Enner Valencia came close to a goal, both times not getting quite enough contact on his header. Argentina have only conceded two goals in this tournament, but the centre of their defence still does not inspire total confidence — and there is also the problem that the team appear to run out of steam in the second half. Sensing this, Alfaro went for the jugular, making attacking substitutions at the interval and having the better of most of the second half. Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni responded by stiffening central midfield with Guido Rodriguez and by introducing Angel Di Maria wide on the right, switching from 4-3-3 to a line of four behind Martinez and Messi.

It paid off, in large part because of Alfaro’s puzzling persistence with teenage centre-back Piero Hincapie, who is undoubtedly promising but equally clearly not yet ready for this level. Inside the last 10 minutes, with the game still very much in the balance, he was caught in possession by Di Maria, Messi played the right pass and Martinez swept home the clinching goal. And there was still time for a gorgeous diagonal ball from De Paul to set Di Maria behind Hincapie. The defender hauled him back and was sent off — and up stepped Messi to complete his strange reunion with Galindez.

In the long shadow of the No. 10

The last time Colombia and Uruguay met in a knockout game in Brazil was seven years ago, when Colombia were propelled to victory by an extraordinary solo goal from James Rodriguez.

The scorer is part of a mythical tradition — the old fashioned South American No. 10, the gifted, sometimes indulged individual who links midfield to attack.

Rodriguez is certainly not being indulged at the moment. Disastrous results last November appeared to have left some bad blood in the Colombian camp, and new coach Reinaldo Rueda was not convinced of Rodriguez’s fitness. So, much to the player’s consternation, he was been left out of the squad for the Copa America. Also absent is the wonderfully talented Juan Fernando Quintero, kept in China by quarantine restrictions. And Rueda clearly does not trust Edwin Cardona of Boca Juniors.

After a deeply disappointing defeat against Peru, Rueda appears to have concluded that Cardona is a luxury player, and left him out of the game against Brazil and Saturday’s meeting with Uruguay.

Colombia, then, had nothing resembling a No. 10 in their team — an astonishing development from the country of Carlos Valderrama. Instead, Rueda played two up top, plus two wingers, one of them an improvised striker, and two more destructive players in the middle. It was a clear declaration: Colombia would not, could not, elaborate in midfield. They would be direct, dealing in rapid transitions and trying to get Duvan Zapata behind the rival defence.

Giorgian De Arrascaeta is still trying to cement his place as Uruguay’s creative fulcrum. EVARISTO SA/AFP

Uruguay, meanwhile, tried to walk the opposite way. Veteran coach Oscar Washington Tabarez has been tempted to extend his long stay in charge for a simple reason; the World Cup in Qatar is the big chance to have both the great strike pair of Luis Suarez and Edinson Cavani, plus the young and promising midfielders Federico Valverde and Rodrigo Bentancur.

But how to link the two? In this tournament Tabarez has given extended opportunities to playmaker Giorgian De Arrascaeta, a player who has been around the squad for seven years without managing to nail down a place. Indeed, Tabarez moved quickly to drop De Arrascaeta after the opening match of the 2018 World Cup. The reason? It is not easy to fit the player into Uruguay’s 4-4-2 formation. Without express pace or physicality, he prefers to have the freedom to roam centrally.

For this game he was given what he wanted. The dynamism of Valverde covered the right side. The spirit of sacrifice of Cavani meant that he occasionally dropped left — allowing De Arrascaeta to wander behind the central striker.

It was not a failure, nor was it a success. There were moments when it threatened, when De Arrascaeta was involved in quick passing moves that threatened to unlock the rival defence. But it was more flickers than flames, and halfway through the second half Tabarez tried something else, withdrawing De Arrascaeta and introducing the more dynamic young Facundo Torres. The Colombian central midfield duo of Wilmar Barrios and Gustavo Cuellar, however, proved a wall too tough to breach.

And so Tabarez exits the game — and the competition — with his doubts not yet resolved. The match was a bit like a couple of heavyweight boxers loading up but unable to land the knockout blow, and after a goalless draw Colombia emerged from the penalty shootout. In Tuesday’s semifinal, Messi becomes the latest rival No. 10 that Barrios and Co. will seek to neutralise.

Categories
Health

That is how the US Indian Well being Service works

Alaskan Indians and Native Americans are entitled to government-funded health care under contracts negotiated between tribal states and the US government.

“Our contracts state that we have a right to health care from the federal government,” said Abigail Echo-Hawk, a registered member of the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma and executive vice president of the Seattle Indian Health Board. “This is supposed to be high quality health care provided to enrolled members of nationally recognized tribes free of charge because we have already paid for it with the land where the United States is located.”

However, according to a 2018 report by the independent and bipartisan Commission on Civil Rights, the US government has not adequately funded these programs, leaving many indigenous communities unable to provide quality care.

“Unless we get the resources we need, it will always be a struggle for us to address the underlying health conditions that have arisen as a result of colonial oppression and repression of both our health and our economic prosperity.” within the Indian country, “said Echo-Hawk.” Until we see full funding for the Indian health service, we will always struggle to do more than just meet the immediate needs of our people. “

In an email statement sent to CNBC, the Indian health service said it has received more than $ 9 billion in “historic investments” since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, “to support long-standing health Addressing Alaskan and Native American inequalities to ensure a comprehensive public health response to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. “

Watch the video above to learn how federally funded health care for Alaskan Indians and Native Americans works, and why many activists and experts want the system to be reformed.