Categories
Technology

Telecoms big BT needs to show outdated broadband bins into EV chargers

The innovation arm of British telecoms giant BT — called Etc. — is looking to convert the Group’s street cabinets into EV charging points.

The big green cabinets, a common sight across the UK, are currently used for providing copper-based broadband and phone services but are soon to be decommissioned as BT transitions to full fibre networks.

The company estimates that as many as 60,000 of its 90,000 cabinets may be suitable for retrofit. Etc. will now conduct a series of technical and commercial pilots over the next two years to determine the feasibility of a conversion on this scale.

The first of these pilots will kick off in Northern Ireland this autumn, and will initially offer BT Group colleagues access to the charging ports. The company plans to broaden the trial to the public soon and launch more pilot locations across the UK later in the year, it said.

Catch up on our conference talks

Watch videos of our past talks for free with TNW All Access →

“With the ban on sales of internal combustion engine vehicles coming in 2030, and with only around 45,000 public charge points today, the UK needs a massive upgrade to meet the needs of the EV revolution,” said Tom Guy, managing director of Etc. at BT Group.

The UK government aims to grow the number of EV charge points from around 45,000 today to 300,000 by 2030 and has allocated £1.6bn to get the job done. It’s not clear from the release whether any of that cash has been allocated to BT’s trials.

Despite the government’s ambitions, recent analysis shows that it is “10 years behind” on its charging infrastructure commitments, which risks derailing the transition to greener transport.  

“Programmes like BT Group’s are an incentive for other businesses and drivers to go electric,” said Helen Clarkson, CEO at London-based non-profit Climate Group. “But we need the UK government to play its part – wider availability of charge points right across the country, not just in London, will help build confidence that switching to an EV is the right option.”

Businesses across Europe are starting to capitalise on the government’s sluggish response. In Ireland for instance, startups are developing solutions to bridge the gap between the growth of EV sales and the roll-out of charge points — from the Airbnb of home chargers to hub-style sites along arterial routes. 

Startups like these are set to benefit from new regulations passed last week which require fast recharging stations to be installed every 60 km along the EU’s main transport corridors by 2025.

Back in the UK, it remains to be seen whether BT will make a dent in the government’s EV charging targets. The company said it is weighing up whether to go into this venture alone or with a pre-established charging partner, acknowledging the necessity to work with local councils and authorities in order to get the infrastructure installed smoothly.

Categories
Science

NASA is Engaged on Expertise to 3D Print Circuits in House

A collaboration of engineers from NASA and academia recently tested hybrid printed electronic circuits near the edge of space, also known as the Kármán line. The space-readiness test was demonstrated on the Suborbital Technology Experiment Carrier-9, or (SubTEC-9), sounding rocket mission, which was launched from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility on April 25 and reached an altitude of approximately 174 kilometers (108 miles), which lasted only a few minutes before the rocket descended to the ground via parachute.

Image of a Terrier-Improved Malamute sounding rocket launching from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility for the SubTEC-9 mission on April 25, 2023. The brief flight carried 14 new technology development experiments, including 3D-printed circuits, a faster telemetry link, and a new star tracker. (Credit: NASA/Kyle Hoppes)

The test consisted of humidity and electronic sensors that were printed on two attached panels along with the payload door, all of which transmitted data to the ground during the brief flight. The mission was deemed a success and holds the potential to help scientists and engineers improve design efficiency for smaller spacecraft.

“The uniqueness of this technology is being able to print a sensor actually where you need it,” said Dr. Margaret Samuels, who is an electronics engineer at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and co-led the experiment with Goddard aerospace engineer, Beth Paquette. “The big benefit is that it’s a space saver. We can print on 3-dimensional surfaces with traces of about 30 microns – half the width of a human hair – or smaller between components. It could provide other benefits for antennas and radio frequency applications.”  

Remove All Ads on Universe Today

Join our Patreon for as little as $3!

Get the ad-free experience for life

The humidity-sensing printing ink was produced at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center while the circuits were created at the University of Maryland’s Laboratory for Physical Sciences (LPS), who each coordinated their efforts with Dr. Samuels and Paquette, demonstrating the collaborative effort undertaken for the project.

Brian Banks, who is an electronics engineer at Wallops, noted the printed circuits provide a new framework for designing smaller spacecraft, for both near-Earth and deep space mission.

Image of the engineering team from NASA and the University of Maryland’s Laboratory for Physical Sciences (LPS) (from left to right): Team lead and Goddard aerospace engineer, Beth Paquette; Wallops electronics engineer Brian Banks; Jason Fleischer of LPS; and Donghun Park, also with LPS. They are displaying the curved metal plate with their printed electronics test assembly in a NASA Wallops Flight Facility laboratory prior to the SubTEC-9 technology test flight from Wallops in April 2023. This flight marked the first hybrid printed electronic circuits to fly into space. (Credit: NASA/Berit Bland)

“The hybrid technology allows for circuits to be fabricated in locations that would typically not be available for conventional electronics modules,” said Banks. “Printing on curved surfaces could also be helpful for small, deployable sub-payloads where space is very limited.”

The circuits were both designed and printed by LPS engineer, Jason Fleischer, who said the SubTEC-9 mission establishes a “turning point” for the evolution and validation of printed-circuit technology at LPS.

According to Paquette, temperature sensors could be printed all over the vehicle’s surface interiors on future missions. For example, that type of mission could analyze the heating and cooling of a spacecraft as it travels close to the Sun.

Image of a 3D-printed circuit on display during the Goddard Field Day event that launched on the Suborbital Technology Experiment Carrier-9 (SubTEC-9) technology test flight from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility in April 2023. (Credit: NASA/Karl B. Hille)

Along with testing the 3D-printed electronic circuits, the SubTEC-9 mission tested a total of 14 different types of technologies. These include a faster telemetry link, a new antenna, a low-cost gyro, a new high-density battery, and a new smaller star tracker, which, as its name implies, is a sensor built to align an object of importance in space, like a star, and is built for altitude control systems.

The SubTEC missions are only a small piece of NASA’s Sounding Rockets Program (NSRP), which started in 1959 with the goal of providing research activities for space and earth sciences. During its tenure, NSRP has launched approximately 3,000 missions to suborbital space, achieving a greater than 90 percent mission success rate over the last two decades along with a launch success rate of 97 percent.

The SubTEC-9 sounding rocket mission is the most recent of NASA’s SubTEC program, whose first launch was in 2005 with recent flights including SubTEC-7, which occurred on May 16, 2017, and SubTEC-8, which occurred on October 24, 2019.

What new discoveries will scientists and engineers make about 3D-printed electronic circuits in the coming years and decades? Only time will tell, and this is why we science!

As always, keep doing science & keep looking up!

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Health

Weight problems drug Wegovy launches in Germany, however prices, waits weigh heavy

Packages of the weight-loss drug Wegovy from the pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk lie on the sales counter in a Danish pharmacy.

Stefan Trumpf | Picture Alliance | Getty Images

Danish pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk launched its hugely popular Wegovy obesity drug in Germany on Saturday, but it could be some time before many patients see the benefits.

High costs and supply constraints threaten to weigh heavy on the rollout, even as the company aims to emulate in Europe the runaway success its weight loss drug has seen in the U.S.

Germany — Wegovy’s third European launch territory and the continent’s largest pharmaceuticals market — presents a vast potential customer base, with more than half (52.1%) of citizens registered as overweight.

However, strict legislation means that slimming, weight-loss and appetite-suppressant medications are not covered by the country’s public health insurance program, meaning the vast majority of potential users will be left to foot the bill themselves.

“Since such uses are considered a matter of individual responsibility and personal lifestyle, these medications are not statutorily financed by the solidarity-based community of those insured,” a spokesperson for Germany’s health ministry told CNBC via email. The country’s public health insurance program covers around 90% of its residents.

Hefty price tag

Wegovy will retail between 170 and 300 euros ($190-$330) per month in Germany, according to pricing data shared with CNBC by Novo Nordisk. That’s well below the U.S. list price of $1,350, although many users are eligible for subsidies.

Still, it’s seen as too expensive for many public health systems in Europe.

Even in Denmark — Novo Nordisk’s home market — an application for Wegovy to receive public health insurance coverage was rejected on the grounds that its cost was incommensurate with its therapeutic value.

The country’s largest private health insurer, Danmark, also announced that it would stop providing subsidies for weight loss drugs from next year due to a “huge increase” in demand.

They’re obviously in a capacity constrained environment and we don’t know how much they’re willing to allocate to Europe.

Emily Field

head of European pharmaceuticals equity research at Barclays

In Norway, Wegovy’s second European market, the drug is not covered by the public health system, though Ozempic, its predecessor, is reimbursed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Meanwhile, in the U.K., initial access to Wegovy under a two-year pilot program will be via hospital specialists and limited to those with a BMI (body mass index) of at least 35 and one weight-related condition, such as diabetes or high blood pressure. As such, only around 35,000 people will be able to access treatment when tens of thousands more could be eligible.

The German Obesity Society — which has received funding from Novo Nordisk — argued that such policies restrict weight-loss treatments only to wealthy individuals, who can afford such drugs out of pocket, and called on public health systems to do more to extend treatment and prevention measures.

“People living with obesity often have to bear the financial burden of their medical treatment themselves. This significantly hinders evidence-based treatment and exacerbates health inequality,” a spokesperson for the group told CNBC.

Supply constraints

Emily Field, head of European pharmaceuticals equity research at Barclays, noted that this might not be enough to dampen demand in Germany, one of Europe’s wealthiest markets.

“Even at current prices in Germany, I still think there will be a decent amount of out-of-pocket demand,” she told CNBC via Zoom. “The interest is very, very real.”

Limited supply, on the other hand, could hinder momentum in an industry forecast to be worth £200 billion within the next decade.

In May, Novo Nordisk announced that it was cutting the supply of starter doses of its obesity drug in the U.S. as it struggled to keep up with surging demand, including from non-obese people. Earlier this month, the company advised doctors in Germany to “prescribe responsibly,” limiting prescriptions to patients with medical needs.

Eli Lily, whose diabetes drug Mounjaro can also be used for weight loss, has also faced supply gluts.

“From investors, there is very little focus on any of the launches outside the U.S. They’re obviously in a capacity constrained environment and we don’t know how much they’re willing to allocate to Europe,” Field said.

Continued health concerns

Results from Novo Nordisk’s closely-watched “Select” trial due in the summer could provide an important litmus test for the industry. If the drug is found to have wider-reaching applications, including cardiovascular benefits, it is more likely that it could be adopted under mainstream healthcare policies.

“Select will be the first evidence that this is more than a vanity drug,” Field said. “[Public health services] don’t want to pay for it if it won’t tackle underlying health conditions.”

Still, the weight loss drug makers have some way to go in combatting wider health concerns.

Earlier this month, the European Markets Authority said it would review a number of drugs used to treat obesity and diabetes amid reports that some patients had experienced thoughts of suicide or self-harm.

Meantime, the World Health Organization has said that weight-loss drugs should not be considered a “silver bullet” for tackling obesity, and instead part of a “comprehensive approach.”

According to WHO, global obesity rates have almost tripled over the past decade. It is currently estimated that 1 billion people are clinically obese, of whom around 650 million are adults, 340 million are adolescents and 39 million are children.

Disclosure: Barclays is an investor in Novo Nordisk and the German Obesity Society has received funding from the drug maker.

Categories
Sport

What’s subsequent for Colts, Jonathan Taylor after commerce request?

  • Stephen Holder

    Close

    Stephen Holder

    ESPN

      Stephen joined ESPN in 2022, covering the Indianapolis Colts and NFL at large. Stephen finished first place in column writing in the 2015 Indiana Associated Press Media Editors competition, and he is a previous top-10 winner in explanatory journalism in the Associated Press Sports Editors national contest. He has chronicled the NFL since 2005, covering the Tampa Bay Buccaneers from 2005-2013 and the Colts since 2013. He has previously worked for the Miami Herald, Tampa Bay Times, Indianapolis Star and The Athletic.
  • Jeremy Fowler

    Close

    Jeremy Fowler

    senior NFL national reporter

    • ESPN staff writer
    • Previously a college football reporter for CBSSports.com
    • University of Florida graduate

Jul 29, 2023, 11:08 PM ET

Jonathan Taylor’s career has taken quite a turn since he led the NFL in rushing in 2021. The Indianapolis Colts running back struggled last season as Indy went 4-12-1, and now Taylor wants out.

Taylor, who’s entering his fourth season, had wanted a lucrative extension, but it became clear that wasn’t going to happen anytime soon, as owner Jim Irsay has been vocal in pushing back against running backs who claim the position is underpaid.

Taylor is part of a growing number of running backs who are unhappy with their contract situations — and who believe their position should be better compensated.

Best of NFL Nation

• The untold stories of Joe Thomas
• Kupp getting back in the groove
• GB biggest concern? The unknown
• Jets’ defense wants to be No. 1
• Camp previews, roster projections

Irsay invited Taylor for a private conversation Saturday night during the Colts’ practice, and news of Taylor requesting a trade broke soon thereafter. Irsay responded that he has no plans to trade Taylor: “Not now. Not in October.”

When he’s at peak form, Taylor is one of the top running backs in the league. He’s averaged 108 scrimmage yards over the past three seasons, topped only by Derrick Henry (129.2) and Dalvin Cook (108.4).

So what’s next? Are Taylor’s days with the Colts over? With this depressed market for running backs, will there be suitors for Taylor? Will Irsay stick to his position against a trade?

ESPN Colts reporter Stephen Holder and senior NFL national reporter Jeremy Fowler answer the biggest questions about what’s next for Taylor and the Colts.

Jonathan Taylor has been on the physically unable to perform list during training camp, and now his future with the Colts is uncertain after he requested a trade. Zach Bolinger/Icon Sportswire

How dug in are both sides, and what are the chances Taylor’s days with the Colts are over?

Holder: Multiple sources have told ESPN that Taylor is incensed about his situation and has been for quite some time.

Taylor’s agent, Malki Kawa, tweeted on Thursday that he doubted the relationship between the Colts and Taylor can be fixed. And that, as well as Kawa tweeting it’s bad faith not to pay your top offensive player, might have ratcheted things up.

As for the Colts, they have taken a firm position based on Irsay’s unequivocal statement about refusing to trade Taylor. What happens next is anyone’s guess, but the state of the relationship between Taylor and the Colts is as bad as it gets between a player and team.

Taylor is on the physically unable to perform list. When was he expected to return and will it affect that timetable?

Holder: The decision to place Taylor on the PUP list Monday, which prohibits him from practicing until he’s activated, came as somewhat of a surprise. Taylor had surgery on his right ankle earlier this offseason, but a few weeks ago, Irsay said in an interview with “The Pat McAfee Show” that Taylor was “healed up.”

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

This situation, a source close to Taylor said, has helped fuel the frustration between Taylor and the team.

It is unclear when Taylor will be activated or — given the trade request — whether he suits up for the Colts at all.

What would the Colts be looking for in return if Irsay pivots about a trade?

Holder: The Colts, according to a source with direct knowledge of the conversations, would be seeking an early-round draft pick. That might be tough given the current climate about the value of running backs.

Former Minnesota Vikings Pro Bowl running back Dalvin Cook, for example, remains on the market after being released during the offseason. But the Colts have settled for less than optimum value in a couple of recent deals. Last season, Indianapolis traded running back Nyheim Hines to the Buffalo Bills for running back Zack Moss and a conditional sixth-round pick. Then, in March, the Colts traded cornerback Stephon Gilmore — the 2019 Defensive Player of the Year — to the Dallas Cowboys for a fifth-round pick.

How will this impact Indy with new head coach Shane Steichen and rookie QB Anthony Richardson?

The presence of an explosive back like Jonathan Taylor would be a huge boost to rookie Anthony Richardson. Zach Bolinger/Icon Sportswire

Holder: It doesn’t help. The running game will be a big component of the offense given the presence of Richardson. This year’s fourth overall draft pick, Richardson thrives in the read option and run-pass option. Having a playmaker like Taylor in the backfield would be a huge asset for the Colts, keeping defenses honest and potentially freezing linebackers after the snap.

Taylor’s big-play ability is what makes him most dangerous. Even if Taylor does return to the lineup, the lack of practice time with Richardson and the offensive line is not ideal.

What would the market be for Taylor if Irsay decides to trade?

Fowler: What hampers Taylor’s market is a team having to relinquish draft capital for the right to give him a new deal in this running back climate. Given Taylor’s importance to the Colts’ offense, Indy would likely want significant draft capital as part of a deal.

But Taylor makes a compelling case for a lucrative deal. He’s 24 and was the best back in football in 2021. His big-play ability should warrant a deal that pays well north of the $10.1 million franchise tag benchmark per year.

Categories
Entertainment

Harry Types Noticed With “Olivia” Tattoo After Olivia Wilde Breakup

Harry Styles has debuted some curious new ink.

While on a boat trip with friends in Bolsena, Italy July 28, the singer was photographed for the first time sporting a thigh tattoo that appears to read, “Olivia.” Styles’ outing took place eight months after E! News confirmed that he and Olivia Wilde broken up after two years of dating.

E! News has reached out to the pop star’s rep for comment about his tattoo and has not heard back.

As seen in photos posted by TMZ and Page Six, Styles appeared on the boat with Late Late Show host James Corden and his wife Julia Carey, plus Victoria’s Secret model Jacquelyn Jablonski and her reported partner Xander Ritz.

Several fans have speculated on social media about the meaning of Styles’ tattoo. While many believe it to be a tribute to Wilde, others have noted that it could also be a reference to the One Direction‘s 2015 song “Olivia.” Styles had co-written the track with songwriters Julian Bunetta and John Ryan but not with any of his former band mates.

Categories
Science

The ‘Time-Travelling’ Pathogen Paranoia • Watts Up With That?

Grab your popcorn, folks! The curtain is up and we’re being treated to the latest in a long line of climate alarmist productions: the tale of ancient, frozen pathogens wreaking havoc on our unsuspecting modern world. According to a new study published in PLOS Computational Biology, these ‘time-travelling’ pathogens could emerge from the melting ice and permafrost due to climate change, posing significant threats to ecosystems and humanity itself.

Climate change could hasten the release of ‘time-travelling’ pathogens from melting permafrost and ice that have been trapped for millennia. Their emergence increases threats to the global environment and even humanity itself.

While melting glaciers and permafrost risk the re-emergence of many types of dormant pathogens, the potential destruction to modern ecosystems posed by these microbes has been difficult to predict.

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/996618

According to Dr. Giovanni Strona, lead author of the study,

“The scientific debate on the topic has been dominated by speculation, due to the challenges in collecting data or designing experiments to elaborate and test hypotheses. For the first time, we provide an extensive analysis of the risk posed to modern ecological communities by these ‘time-travelling’ pathogens through advanced computer simulations.”

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/996618

The researchers have run some impressive-sounding digital simulations, pitting modern microbial communities against their ancient counterparts and observing the ensuing chaos.

Of course, the inevitable doomsday results are presented. The study reveals that

“about 1% of those invaders presented unpredictable results — some caused up to one third of the host species to die out, while others increased diversity by up to 12% compared to the simulations where escape was not permitted.”

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/996618

For the uninitiated, it might sound like we’re on the cusp of an ecological apocalypse. But for those who’ve seen this show before, it’s the same old fear-mongering script dressed up with different props.

As is so often the case, the devil is in the details. These “computer simulations” are just that – simulations, not reality. As all mathematicians and scientists worth their salt know, any model is only as good as its inputs and assumptions. Simulating the interactions of long-dormant pathogens with modern ecosystems involves countless variables and uncertainties.

Flinders University Professor Corey Bradshaw furthers the climate catastrophe narrative by suggesting that the release of these pathogens is “not negligible” and warns that

“in the worst, but still entirely plausible case, the invasion of a single ancient pathogen reduced the size of its host community by 30% when compared to our non-invasive controls.”

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/996618

Yet he conveniently fails to mention the wide range of outcomes these simulations produced, focusing solely on the ‘worst-case’ scenarios that fuel the most fear.

Interestingly, the researchers admit that the risks from these pathogens might seem small, given that they are based on just 1% of their simulations. However, they quickly follow this concession with an attempt to amplify fear by asserting that

“given the sheer number of ancient microbes regularly released into modern communities, these outbreaks represent a substantial danger.”

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/996618

While they don’t specifically mention it, this is another case of Climate Alarmists using the logic of Pascal’s Wager in policy debates. What these “scientists” fail to appreciate when accepting the logic of the wager, is that in order to be logically consistent they now must attend church religiously and become pious Christians. You can’t pick and choose when you apply the logic. It either is valid or it isn’t.

Are these so-called ‘time-travelling’ pathogens really the significant threat we’re being led to believe, or just another piece in the alarmist puzzle, designed to generate fear and secure more funding for climate-related research?

Science should not be a tool for manipulation and alarmist propaganda. We must demand better from those who seek to inform us, insisting they do so in a manner that respects the complexities and uncertainties inherent in their work, rather than resorting to simplified scare tactics.

Readers, what are your thoughts on this latest climate alarmist tale? Drop your comments below.

JOURNAL

PLoS Computational Biology

DOI

10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011268 

METHOD OF RESEARCH

Computational simulation/modeling

SUBJECT OF RESEARCH

People

ARTICLE TITLE

Time-travelling pathogens and their risk to ecological communities

4.2
5
votes

Article Rating

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Technology

These antimicrobial spacesuits may remedy astronauts’ laundry woes

Wardrobe malfunctions are never fun. When on Earth, they might be a nuisance or prove somewhat embarrassing. In space however, they could be a matter of life and death. Not to mention, how do you handle, uhm, laundry on the Moon?

The European Space Agency (ESA) says that the next generation of lunar explorers will be kitted with a wholly upgraded set of spacesuits. And textile tech has come quite a way since the iconic string of Apollo missions in the ‘60s and ‘70s.

Other than having to stand up to an extra-terrestrial environment characterised by high vacuum, radiation, extreme temperatures, and space dust, spacesuits are also subject to good old fashioned germs. 

As we gear up to send humans to the Moon for the first time in over 50 years, ESA is conducting a project called PExTex to assess suitable materials for future spacesuit designs.

Keeping your underwear clean, in space

The <3 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

It is joined by the Austrian Space Forum (OeWF), which is leading a sub-project called BACTeRMA, trying to find ways of limiting microbial growth in the inner lining of the material. (The abbreviation stands for Biocidal Advanced Coating Technology for Reducing Microbial Activity.)

“Think about keeping your underwear clean; it’s an easy enough job on a daily basis, thanks to detergent, washing machines and dryers,” ESA materials and processes engineer Malgorzata Holynska commented. “But in habitats on the Moon or beyond, washing spacesuit interiors on a consistent basis may well not be practical.

“In addition, spacesuits will most probably be shared between different astronauts, and stored for long periods between use, potentially in favourable conditions for microorganisms. Instead we needed to find alternative solutions to avoid microbial growth.”

Collection of bacteriaBacteria can be vibrantly colourful. Credit: ESA

The researchers had to forego traditional antimicrobial materials such as copper and silver as they are likely to tarnish over time, not to mention chafe. The team then turned to what are called “secondary metabolites.” 

These are organic compounds produced by plants, fungi, and microorganisms, but they are not directly involved in basic cellular processes required for growth, development, and reproduction. Their functions involve protection from pathogens and other organisms, which is what lends them their antibiotic qualities. 

Austrian textile startup has ‘unique collection’

To work out the details on how to actually get these materials onto fabric, the OeWF has enlisted the Vienna Textile Lab. Apparently, the Austrian startup, which focuses on developing organic colours for textiles using microbes, is in possession of a unique “bacteriographic” collection. 

Violacein pigment produced by bacteria. Violacein pigment produced by bacteria. Credit: ESA

The two have collaborated on various “biocidal textile processing techniques,” such as dying cloth with the metabolites and then exposing them to both human perspiration and all other kinds of stressors they will encounter in space. 

These newly developed fabrics are currently being integrated into a spacesuit simulator, and are scheduled to undergo field testing in March 2024.

Where humans go, bacteria will follow. Many of these microorganisms are literally vital to life on Earth. They may also become essential in everything from producing rocket fuel to manufacturing food on longer space missions to Mars. However, as anyone who has ever suffered from food poisoning can attest, they can also be downright nasty little buggers. What’s more, there is evidence some species can survive in the harsh environment of space for years. 

Keeping harmful bacteria at bay is crucial to a successful space mission. NASA says it “puts a lot of effort” into knowing which microbes might hitch a ride on the spaceships heading out to orbit, and continuously monitors what’s going on with bacteria on the International Space Station (ISS). Some teeny-tiny astronauts are even brought along on purpose, for space microbiology research.

Categories
Health

What uptake of recent photographs might seem like

A pharmacist delivers a COVID-19 booster dose at a Chicago CVS store.

Antonio Perez | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

A new round of Covid vaccines is coming to the U.S. this fall — but many Americans may not roll up their sleeves and take one.

That’s largely because pandemic fatigue, the belief that Covid is “over” and confusion over personal risk levels could deter some people from getting an additional shot, experts in public health and health policy told CNBC.

related investing news

But they said public health officials and health-care providers could potentially increase uptake of the new vaccines by communicating a new and simple message this fall: Covid vaccines are likely going to become a routine part of protecting your health moving forward. 

In September, vaccine manufacturers Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax are slated to deliver new single-strain Covid shots targeting the omicron subvariant XBB.1.5, the most immune-evasive strain of the virus to date. 

It will be a “very uphill battle” to get people to take those jabs, especially given the sluggish uptake of the most recent shots that rolled out, said Jen Kates, senior vice president of the health policy research organization KFF. 

Only about 17% of the U.S. population — around 56 million people — have received Pfizer and Moderna’s bivalent Covid vaccines since they were approved last September, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Bivalent means they target two strains of the virus. 

Less than half of adults 65 and older have received a bivalent shot, while rates for all other age groups sit at around 20%. 

Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax have not provided exact estimates for what they expect uptake of their new shots to look like.

But a Pfizer spokesperson said overall the company expects 24% of the population, or 79 million people, to receive vaccine doses in 2023, which includes both primary doses and boosters. A Novavax spokesperson said the company has started “manufacturing at risk” and is “stockpiling enough material to support the upcoming launch for the season.”

All companies have noted that they are preparing for the federal government to shift vaccine distribution to the private market, meaning manufacturers will sell their updated shots directly to health-care providers at higher prices. Previously, the government purchased vaccines directly from manufacturers at a discount to distribute to the public for free. 

Regardless of that shift, experts say vaccine uptake may not look much different from that of the bivalent boosters. Here’s why.

Pandemic fatigue, confusion

Fatigue over the pandemic and the general belief that Covid is “over” could potentially hinder the uptake of new shots this fall, experts said.

A June poll conducted by Gallup found that 64% of Americans think the pandemic is over in the U.S. and only 18% are worried about contracting the virus.

Ipsos and Axios released a survey with similar findings in May, the same month the U.S. ended the national Covid public health emergency amid a downward trend in cases, hospitalizations and deaths.

But Covid is still killing people every day and isn’t going away anytime soon. Meanwhile, many Americans are becoming weary of recommendations for protection. That includes masking, testing for the virus and getting vaccinated.

“People have essentially moved on, especially given how long the pandemic has been,” Dr. Kartik Cherabuddi, a professor of medicine at the University of Florida, told CNBC.

He said that’s why it’s important to stress how people will personally benefit from receiving an additional vaccine this fall.

But there’s an even a bigger problem: Personal Covid risks and benefits from getting another shot have been a major area of confusion for Americans, which could also hamper the uptake.

The confusion stems from the fact that “risk levels aren’t the same for everybody in the population right now,” and almost everyone has a different circumstance, according to Dr. Brad Pollock, chair of UC Davis Health’s department of public health sciences.

“It’s this perception of the individual. ‘Why should I get another booster? What is my risk? Why should I do it? Is it really worth doing now, or later?'” Pollock told CNBC. “I think everybody’s confused. And when they’re confused, they probably will do nothing until there’s more clarity.”

Safeway pharmacist Ashley McGee fills a syringe with the Pfizer COVID-19 booster vaccination at a vaccination booster shot clinic on October 01, 2021 in San Rafael, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

The CDC hasn’t recommended the updated shots to specific groups yet because they haven’t been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. But even after eligibility guidelines are formalized, confusion could potentially remain.

Those at high risk of severe Covid, such as older adults and immunocompromised people, could potentially benefit more than the general population.

But even those patients have different circumstances: Some high-risk people may have recently received a fifth vaccine dose, which could push back when they can get the updated vaccine. Health officials usually recommend spacing out vaccinations over a specific number of months.

Meanwhile, some healthy adults may have four doses but may be unsure about getting another because the benefit of a fifth dose for those less vulnerable to severe Covid still isn’t clear, Pollock said. 

People who recently had Covid may also have to wait longer to get a new shot so they can maximize the protection they get from vaccination — a recommendation made when the bivalent boosters rolled out. 

But that could get even more complicated this fall, according to Cherabuddi. He said testing for Covid has dropped to new lows over the past year, “so we don’t even know who has been infected in the last few months.” 

Those individualized circumstances will likely make it more challenging for both health officials and health-care providers to convey clear messages about the updated vaccines this fall, Cherabuddi and other experts said.

The Health and Human Services Department did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

Vaccine manufacturers have noted that they will continue to engage in a variety of outreach efforts to encourage the public to get vaccinated.

A new message may increase rates 

But KFF’s Kates said health officials and providers could potentially increase uptake if they communicate that Covid shots are “likely going to be more of a routine part of our health care going forward.” 

The FDA and CDC are hoping to transition toward a flu shot-like model for Covid vaccines, meaning people will get a single jab every year that is updated annually to target the latest variant expected to circulate in the fall and winter. 

A man walks past an urgent care facility offering flu shots in New York, the United States, on Dec. 7, 2022.

Michael Nagle | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

Kates said that schedule aims to simplify the process of getting vaccinated. For example, it will likely make it easier for Americans to remember to get a new vaccine every year and allow them to receive one with their flu shot during the same doctor’s visit.

“People might be more open to making this a normal part of what they do,” Kates said. “That contrasts with what we’ve seen in the past where there are different vaccines, different timing, different age groups and something new to consider every few months.”

There’s still uncertainty about whether the U.S. will update and distribute new shots on an annual basis, according to Kates.

Advisors to the FDA have raised concerns about shifting to yearly Covid vaccines, noting that it’s unclear if the virus is seasonal like the flu. 

A KFF poll released in April suggests that an annual schedule may boost uptake: More than half of the public said they would likely get an annual Covid shot if it was offered like an annual flu shot. That includes about a third who would be “very likely” to do so. 

Pfizer similarly told CNBC in May that an annual Covid schedule could encourage more people to vaccinate each year. The company is preparing to shift to that schedule by developing “next-generation” versions of its shot, which aim to extend the protection people get from the virus to a full year.

Commercial market may not change much 

It’s unclear whether the U.S.’s shift to the commercial market will affect the uptake of the new vaccines. 

It may not change much for insured Americans. Private insurers and the government-run Medicare and Medicaid programs are required to cover all shots recommended by the CDC, meaning most of the insured will continue to get Covid shots for free. 

Federal and corporate programs are aiming to fill the gap for the 25 million to 30 million uninsured adults in the U.S. That includes the Biden administration’s Bridge Access Program, which plans to provide free Covid vaccines to uninsured people through 2024. 

Kates said it’s “still hard to gauge” how many uninsured people will benefit from those efforts. 

She also noted that a shift in access could potentially lower uptake among the group. “Somebody might be worried that they won’t get their vaccine covered or they’ll be asked to pay for it when they can’t afford it. That could be a big deterrent,” Kates said. 

But Dr. Helen Chu, an epidemiology professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine, said the uninsured have continued to lag behind their insured counterparts in terms of vaccine uptake even “when shots were freely available to them.”

A KFF survey conducted in March found that only 22% of uninsured Americans under 65 were both vaccinated and boosted against Covid, compared with 44% of insured people in that age group. Another KFF survey from mid-2021 showed similar findings.

“I’m not sure that a person’s insurance status was necessarily the driver of the low uptake we’ve seen, or whether it will be the driver of potentially low uptake in the fall as well,” Chu told CNBC. 

Categories
Entertainment

DDG Says He is Quitting Youtube To Focus On Music (Video)

The end of an era? DDG has shared that he will no longer create YouTube videos and plans to focus on his rap career.

RELATED: LISTEN: DDG Says He Doesn’t ‘Want’ Rubi Rose After Addressing Her Halle Bailey Shirt Claims In New Song

How The Rapper’s Decision Came About

Earlier this week, DDG took to Twitter to pose a question to his fans.

“youtube or music? i can’t do both no more”

Although commenters seemed to be 50/50 on the decision — DDG confirmed in his latest YouTube video that it would be his last. Additionally, the 25-year-old creator with 3.24 million subscribers wiped his entire channel clean of past vlogs and video content.

More Details Regarding DDG’s “Last YouTube Video”

  “I was doing Youtube to eat. I was doing Youtube to pay my bills and make money… if you told me right now you wouldn’t make a dollar off rapping, I would still do it. I don’t want no plan B.”

The 25-year-old’s decision comes on the heels of his latest single, ‘Famous,” which had some people criticizing his lyrics after he opened up about his insecurities in his relationship with Halle Bailey.

“I been so insecure that I be thinkin’ you really be f*****g n****s you in movies with// But on the internet, I just be coolin’ it, but in my head, a n***a really losin’ it// Gotta be payin’ good ’cause you keep doin’ it, I might just tweet somethin’ just to ruin it// I got a platform, I’m abusin’ it// It’s a couple things about your job I wanna know // When you shoot your movie, do these n****s turn you on? // When you leave the set, do y’all still text each other phone? // Just because they filmin’ it, it don’t mean that it ain’t wrong.”

Many were appalled at the rapper’s lyrics and suggested that Bailey break up with him. Additionally, many social media users responded by calling DDG a “failed rapper.” However, the 25-year-old reportedly addressed the criticism and explained that the song is just for “entertainment.”

The Rapper Addresses His Previous “Twitter Antics”

DDG is no stranger to clapping back on Twitter. Earlier this year, the rapper reportedly found himself involved in a feud with content creator Solluminati. Solluminati fired shots at DDG, claiming his name stood for “Doo Doo Garbage.”

In each social media incident, DDG’s rap career appears to be the punchline. However, his recent pivot could be an effort to prove the naysayers wrong.

Earlier this week, the 25-year-old addressed his past behavior, which may also point to some upcoming changes.

“Looking back on my Twitter antics and rants these pass few months ngl I was trippin”

Despite DDG’s current success, he has admitted that quitting youtube is a significant risk and could end his relevancy. Last year, he ignited a heated Twitter debate when he said YouTubers/streamers make more money than rappers.

RELATED: DDG Says YouTubers And Streamers Earn More Than Rappers: ‘It’s Not Even Close’

However, now the rapper says he will take a pay cut to chase his dreams. Roomies, are y’all here for it?!

Categories
Sport

UFC 291 dwell outcomes and evaluation: Poirier vs. Gaethje 2

  • Brett Okamoto

    Close

    Brett Okamoto

    ESPN Staff Writer

    • MMA columnist for ESPN.com
    • Analyst for “MMA Live”
    • Covered MMA for Las Vegas Sun
  • Marc Raimondi

Jul 29, 2023, 09:13 PM ET

The BMF title is back.

Dustin Poirier and Justin Gaethje, two of the most exciting action fighters in MMA, will fight for the symbolic belt Saturday in the main event of UFC 291 in Salt Lake City. The first BMF title was won by Jorge Masvidal in 2019 after a victory over Nate Diaz at Madison Square Garden. The belt name, abbreviated for “baddest motherf—er,” represents fighters who leave it all in the Octagon.

Poirier vs. Gaethje has added stakes, too. The winner will be in pole position for a lightweight title shot following Islam Makhachev’s defense against Charles Oliveira at UFC 294 in October. ESPN ranks Gaethje No. 4 and Poirier No. 5 in the world at lightweight. Poirier is also ranked No. 10 on ESPN’s pound-for-pound list. Both Poirier and Gaethje are former interim UFC lightweight champions. The two fought in 2018 in one of the best fights of that year that resulted in Poirier winning by fourth-round TKO.

Poirier (29-7, 1 NC) is coming off a third-round submission win over Michael Chandler at UFC 281 last November. The Louisiana native has won four of his past five fights, including a pair of finishes of Conor McGregor during that stretch. Poirier, 34, is tied with Drew Dober for the most knockouts in UFC lightweight history (8).

Gaethje (24-4) most recently beat Rafael Fiziev via split decision at UFC 286 in March. The Arizona native, who fights out of Colorado, has won six of his past eight. Gaethje, 34, is a former WSOF lightweight champion. Nicknamed “The Highlight,” he has amassed quite the reel in the UFC and has landed the second-most significant strikes per minute in UFC lightweight history (7.38).

In the co-main event, former UFC light heavyweight champion Jan Blachowicz and former UFC middleweight champion Alex Pereira will clash in a light heavyweight contender bout. Pereira is moving up after dropping the middleweight belt in a rematch with rival Israel Adesanya at UFC 287 in April. Blachowicz vs. Pereira is especially relevant since light heavyweight has no champion. Jamahal Hill had to vacate after rupturing his Achilles earlier this month.

Follow along as Brett Okamoto and Marc Raimondi recap all the action from cageside or watch the fights on ESPN+ PPV.