Categories
Entertainment

Kate Spade Outlet Has Effortlessly Cool Crossbodies As much as 75% off

In my wardrobe, I like to have bags that can match a lot of different outfits (capsule wardrobe-esque). I just don’t have the space or funds for extra baggage, so what I have has to be stylish and versatile. Luckily, Kate Spade Outlet understands where I’m coming from. I always find something on the site that pairs with my aesthetic, budget, and comes with a quality that I trust. So when I heard about Kate Spade’s recent sale, I immediately perked up. For a limited time, you can save up to 15% on orders over $150, 20% on orders over $200, and 25% on orders over $275 using code SAVEMORE at checkout. That means the $299 colorblock backpack that’s on sale for $89, could be $66. The more you buy, the more you save. And if you don’t feel like calculating the girl math right now, don’t worry about it. For the chic and cool bags below I’ve taken the extra 25% off to give you an idea of how much you could potentially save.

You’ll find crossbodies, shoulder bags, backpacks, belt bags, and more, all on sale. And the deals are so enticing, you might find it easy to score a few bags for yourself (or a loved one) for $275 and then save 25% off. These bags feature styles and colorways that go with every outfit, from day to night, and everything in between.

But, you won’t find these classic pieces at these prices for too long. So, scroll down and make your way over to Kate Spade Outlet. Your cool spring look has arrived.

Categories
Health

Here is why Basic Catalyst is attempting to purchase Summa Well being

Dr. Marc Harrison, who’s now CEO of HATCo, speaking at the Healthy Returns conference in New York City on May 21, 2019.

Astrid Stawiarz | CNBC

Dr. Marc Harrison is a different kind of venture capitalist.

He’s not looking for the next Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk. He’s not hanging out at startup demo days. He’s definitely not posting life advice screeds to founders on X. (He hardly posts at all.)

Far removed from the internet hub of Silicon Valley, Harrison went to medical school in the late 1980s and has spent the bulk of the past two decades at the upper ranks of medical systems, most recently as CEO of Intermountain Healthcare, a Utah-based nonprofit with 33 hospitals and over 63,000 employees.

In late 2022, Harrison joined venture firm General Catalyst, which has backed tech highfliers like Stripe, Snap and Airbnb. But the move to VC from health care hardly represented a career change.

In January, General Catalyst announced it was buying Summa Health, a nonprofit integrated health system that supports more than 1,000 inpatient beds across its network of hospitals, community-based health centers and its multi-specialty group practice. Summa operates across five counties in northeast Ohio and also runs a health insurance entity. 

Under its new structure, Summa will become a for-profit organization, and General Catalyst says it will introduce new tech-enabled solutions that aim to make care more accessible and affordable.

General Catalyst set the stage for the deal when it brought in Harrison and, a year later, introduced a new company called the Health Assurance Transformation Corporation, or HATCo, that would operate on a “decades-long time horizon.” Harrison was named HATCo CEO, and is now in charge of overseeing its work with Summa.

“This is the first time that anybody has done anything quite like this,” Harrison, 60, told CNBC in an interview. “There are many digital health solutions that are out there as point solutions. This is the first holistic transformation of a health system to a thoughtful combination of digital and in-person care.”

The deal isn’t done.

Over the next several months, HATCo and Summa will engage in a due diligence period, work to craft a definitive agreement and begin to map out the specific challenges they hope to tackle. In the latter half of the year, the transaction will go through the regulatory approval process. 

The parties declined to share specific financial details about the acquisition with CNBC, but HATCo wants to make clear that this isn’t just “another ‘private equity’ deal,” Harrison wrote in a statement. By that, he means the objective isn’t to overhaul Summa by cutting costs. 

Summa Health Medina Medical Center

Courtesy: Summa Health

History in health care

While buying a hospital is an unprecedented move in the venture industry, where firms rake in big piles of money from institutional investors and seek to outperform the market, General Catalyst has a rich history in the broader health-care sector.

The 24-year-old firm has closed the most deals in digital health since 2020, according to data from PitchBook. Its portfolio companies in the space include insurer Oscar and digital health company Livongo, which was acquired by Teladoc almost four years ago.

Hospitals are different though, and many are nonprofits for a reason. Providing health care is expensive, and reimbursement rates can vary dramatically. With patients shouldering so much of the load, a study last year by the Urban Institute found that 73% of adults with medical debt owe hospitals at least some of that money. 

An October report from Fitch Ratings said labor costs “remain stubbornly high,” and that controlling these expenses will be crucial if nonprofit hospitals want to reduce credit pressure and deliver stronger margins. 

Conditions are not likely to change overnight.

“We expect weak margins to persist through 2023 and into 2024 due to an inelastic revenue model and higher labor costs due to still very tight labor conditions,” Fitch said. 

General Catalyst says it wants Summa to serve as a “blueprint” that shows other health systems how delivering better care for patients can also be “good for business.”

Experts like Ceci Connolly have concerns. Connolly, CEO of the Alliance of Community Health Plans, which represents nonprofit provider-aligned regional health plans, said she’s excited to see if the deal presents a new approach that can address some of the problems in health care. She’s just not sure how it will work.

“I would be lying if I didn’t say it gives me a little bit of pause that you are going to take a nonprofit, community-based health-care entity, and now have it answering to investors and needing to generate profits,” Connolly said. 

Connolly’s viewpoint makes sense. Limited partners — the endowments, sovereign wealth funds and pensions systems that put money into venture capital — look to the asset class as a bet on innovation in tech. It’s where billions can get minted on a single lucky bet.

“A lot of people feel like a PE or venture capital company owning a hospital is kind of like asking Freddy Krueger to come babysit your kids,” said John Bass, CEO of the health-care venture studio Hashed Health. “It just makes people a little nervous, and it doesn’t feel quite aligned with this concept of health care being a human right.”

Still, Bass said he’s “thrilled” to see General Catalyst take big swings in health-care innovation, given all the challenges the industry faces.

HATCo is capitalized outside of General Catalyst’s funds structure. It operates as a holding company within General Catalyst and is completely independent from its venture business, the firm says, though it will collaborate with the investment team. 

General Catalyst said HATCo is not designed to realize returns through increases in volume-based revenue or cost cutting. Instead, it will work to generate new revenue streams by introducing new solutions and models of care.

Chris Bischoff has been leading General Catalyst’s health investments since 2021. The firm has been in the space for more than a decade, and Bischoff said it’s come to view the health-care business as having two distinct but interrelated parts. 

The first is the “innovation side,” or the more traditional venture business, where General Catalyst works with entrepreneurs to create and scale new solutions. The second is the “transformation side,” which now includes HATCo. The goal there is to partner with health systems to try and speed up delivery and roll out new tools. 

“We see a really powerful flywheel between the two,” Bischoff told CNBC in an interview. 

Chris Bischoff speaks at Slush 2023.

Courtesy of General Catalyst

General Catalyst has teamed up with more than 20 health systems across the U.S., Canada, the U.K. and Israel as part of its transformation business. The partnerships are designed to share best practices and encourage collaboration. Bischoff said they help reduce friction when it comes to tech deployment, eliminating the need for a bunch of third parties to get involved. 

Some partners include HCA Healthcare, University of California Davis Health and Intermountain Healthcare, Harrison’s former employer. In a book published last year about his work at Intermountain, Harrison wrote that General Catalyst was helping the hospital build a new marketplace, much like the App Store, for health care.

“Think of it this way: Major airlines don’t build their own air-planes,” he wrote. “They work with a range of partners to help them deliver their offerings. To revolutionize how we care for patients, we in health care are doing the same.”

The matter is personal for Harrison.

In 2009, he was diagnosed with bladder cancer, which was remedied thanks to “aggressive surgical treatment,” Harrison wrote in his book.

But almost a decade later, he was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, a form of blood cancer, and things looked dire. After a failed bone marrow transplant, Harrison said he “scrambled” and tried a novel immunotherapy that eventually helped him get his condition under control.

“I don’t know how long this treatment and others I might try will contain my disease, so I’m not wasting a minute,” Harrison wrote.

If his athletic accomplishments are any indication, Harrison isn’t one to back down from a grueling fight. He’s a nine-time Ironman participant who represented the U.S. in 2014 at the world triathlon championship.

‘There’s a lot of unused capacity’

Michael Greeley, co-founder and general partner at the health tech VC firm Flare Capital Partners, said the health-care provider world is in “acute distress” as many organizations are trying to operate on “razor thin profit margins.”

“There’s a lot of unused capacity, like beds that are empty, because they literally don’t have the labor to clean the rooms,” Greeley told CNBC in an interview. “It’s a high fixed-costs business that, if you can’t drive the volume through it, you’re gonna lose money.”

On its FAQ page about the acquisition, Summa said it’s in “sound financial standing” and on track to meet its targets. The organization reported $1.79 billion in revenue in 2022, up from $1.67 billion in 2021, according to Summa’s annual reports. 

However, the organization said it would have a limited capacity to invest in growth or other improvements within its existing structure since challenges like supply costs will continue to hurt its bottom line.

Summa had been on the market for a partner since 2018. The next year it announced plans to merge with the Michigan-based system Beaumont Health. The organizations reached a definitive agreement that December, but Beaumont, now Corewell Health, suddenly pulled out months later without offering a public explanation. 

Summa Health System – Akron Campus

Courtesy: Summa Health

Dr. Cliff Deveny, Summa’s CEO, said that in the years that followed, the organization hadn’t been able to find a health system with adequate digital health resources and technological ambitions, especially since many large providers are contending with similar financial constraints. 

“We had been on about a 10-year journey of growing, but not really making the transformational changes in and how we run our business,” Deveny told CNBC in an interview. “We saw this as a way to really pivot and change how we provide care.”

HATCo set its sights on Summa after scanning the broader health-care environment. Harrison said he was fortunate to meet Deveny early in the search.

Summa’s executive leadership team will remain intact, and the organization says it will continue to provide the same services to patients and the greater community. 

Harrison said the executives will have to remain careful and rigorous about managing traditional operations, but that they will now have additional “money, time, people, technology.”

“This is not like a turnaround, this is not a distressed system,” Harrison said. “This is an excellent system that has weathered maybe the most difficult time in health care that anybody’s ever experienced, and they’ve done it well. And now they’re ready to go to the next level.”

HATCo said its primary objective is to bring sustainable and agile innovation to Summa, particularly through the introduction of new platforms and tech solutions. The organization will also transition to what’s known as a value-based care model, which incentivizes preventative care and keeping patients healthy as opposed to charging fees for services like appointments and procedures. 

It’s an expensive undertaking, and aligning insurance payers, clinicians and patients behind a value-based care model is often easier said than done.

Harrison said HATCo will likely use tech solutions from some of General Catalyst’s portfolio companies, as well as from others. The tech companies HATCo taps will be on the mature side, not early-stage startups, he added.

Ben Sutton, Summa’s operating chief, said the two organizations are also still evaluating what introducing new technologies will look like in practice. 

“We want to build it from the ground up,” Sutton told CNBC. “We really want to make sure that we’re tailoring those solutions to the challenges that we’re having here in Akron and in the region that we serve, and make sure that we’re implementing things that are most impactful immediately.”

Additionally, Summa will no longer operate as a nonprofit system. Summa said on its website it will start a new community foundation in order to maintain its commitment to charity care, but the Summa Health Foundation will no longer be operational. 

We’re not ‘guinea pigs’

Summa supports a workforce of around 8,500 people, making it the largest employer in Summit County, home to the city of Akron. There’s some fear among the locals about what happens next. 

At a luncheon in late January, Akron Mayor Shammas Malik said residents and employees have expressed some confusion and concern about the deal, according to a report by Ideastream Public Media. More than 450 people have signed a petition urging Summa to remain a nonprofit and to halt negotiations with HATCo.

James Hardy, a member of Akron’s city council, said during a meeting on Jan. 22, that he opposed the sale, citing a “moral objection to the use of Summa, its staff and its patients as ‘guinea pigs’ for venture capitalists.” 

During his more than six-minute speech, which was met at the end with scattered applause, Hardy went on to ask that Summa pause the process and consider alternatives like converting the hospital to a “county-owned system.”

“The community has not been consulted at all and we stand to gain or lose the most at the outcome of this proposal,” Hardy said. “At the very least, Summa owes greater Akron a transparent process where concerns and questions of the general public are asked and answered.”

Mayor Malik met with Harrison and Summa executives early in February, following the city council meeting, and had a “positive and thoughtful conversation” about their ambitions to create a “new model” for health care instead of making cuts, the mayor said in a statement to CNBC. 

“When looking at the proposed Summa acquisition, there are plenty of fair and understandable concerns,” Malik said in a statement. “There is also the potential for this to be a very positive and transformative step for Summa, stabilizing a pillar of our community.” 

Harrison has dealt with competing concerns in the past. In his book, he wrote about steering Intermountain during the Covid pandemic, when health-care workers, government officials and Utah residents openly disagreed about the right path forward.

“Rather than avoiding conflict or seeking to ram through it, we’ve accepted it as a fact of life and attempted to manage it adroitly and compassionately on behalf of progress,” Harrison wrote.

HATCo has a complex, decades-long road ahead, and Harrison is now at the center of an effort to show that community-based health-care providers can be profitable without cutting costs or abandoning patients.

Flare Capital’s Greeley said other VCs are unlikely to follow General Catalyst’s lead because of all the costs and complexities involved in owning a hospital system. But he said he’s cheering the firm on from the sidelines.

“Hats off,” he said. “If anybody can pull it off, I think they’ll have a reasonably good shot.” 

WATCH: Health care has more upside ahead

Categories
Science

New Examine Addresses how Lunar Missions will Kick up Moondust.

Before the end of this decade, NASA plans to return astronauts to the Moon for the first time since the Apollo Era. But this time, through the Artemis Program, it won’t be a “footprints and flags” affair. With other space agencies and commercial partners, the long-term aim is to create the infrastructure that will allow for a “sustained program of lunar exploration and development.” If all goes according to plan, multiple space agencies will have established bases around the South Pole-Aitken Basin, which will pave the way for lunar industries and tourism.

For humans to live, work, and conduct various activities on the Moon, strategies are needed to deal with all the hazards – not the least of which is lunar regolith (or “moondust”). As the Apollo astronauts learned, moondust is jagged, sticks to everything, and can cause significant wear on astronaut suits, equipment, vehicles, and health. In a new study by a team of Texas A&M engineers, regolith also poses a collision hazard when kicked up by rocket plumes. Given the many spacecraft and landers that will be delivering crews and cargo to the Moon in the near future, this is one hazard that merits close attention!

The study was conducted by Shah Akib Sarwar and Zohaib Hasnain, a Ph.D. Student and an Assistant Professor (respectively) with the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. For their study, Sarwar and Hasnain investigated particle-particle collisions for lunar regolith using the “soft sphere” method, where Newton’s equations of motion and a contact force model are integrated to study how particles will collide and overlap. This sets it apart from the “hard sphere” method, which models particles in the context of fluids and solids.

Apollo 15 astronaut salutes next to the American flag in 1971. The Moon’s regolith or soil appears in various shades of gray. Credit: NASA

While lunar regolith ranges from tiny particles to large rocks, the main component of “Moondust” is fine, silicate minerals with an average size of 70 microns. These were created over billions of years as the airless Moon’s airless surface was struck by meteors and asteroids that pounded much of the lunar crust into a fine powder. The absence of an atmosphere also meant that erosion by wind and water (common here on Earth) was absent. Lastly, constant exposure to solar wind has left lunar regolith electrostatically charged, which means it adheres to anything it touches.

When the Apollo astronauts ventured to the Moon, they reported having problems with regolith that would stick to their suits and get tracked back into their lunar modules. Once inside their vehicles, it would adhere to everything and became a health hazard, causing eye irritation and respiratory difficulties. But with the Artemis missions on the horizon and the planned infrastructure it will entail, there’s the issue of how spacecraft (during take-off- and landing) will cause regolith to get kicked up in large quantities and accelerated to high speeds.

As Sarwar related to Universe Today via email, this is one of the key ways lunar regolith will be a major challenge for regular human activities on the Moon:

“During a retro-propulsive soft landing on the Moon, supersonic/hypersonic rocket exhaust plumes can eject a large quantity (108 – 1015 particles/m3 seen in Apollo missions) of loose regolith from the upper soil layer. Due to plume-generated forces – drag, lift, etc. – the ejecta can travel at very high speeds (up to 2 km/s). The spray can harm the spacecraft and nearby equipment. It can also block the view of the landing area, disrupt sensors, clog mechanical elements, and degrade optical surfaces or solar panels through contamination.”

Data acquired from the Apollo missions served as a touchstone for Sarwar and Hasnain, which included how ejecta from the exhaust plume from the Apollo 12 Lunar Module (LM) damaged the Surveyor 3 spacecraft, located 160 meters (525 ft) away. This uncrewed vehicle had been sent to explore the Mare Cognitum region in 1967 and characterize lunar soil in advance of crewed missions. Surveyor 3 was also used as a landing target site for Apollo 12 and was visited by astronauts Pete Conrad and Alan Bean in November 1969.

A look at the Apollo 12 landing site. Astronaut Alan Bean is shown working near the Modular Equipment Stowage Assembly (MESA) on the Apollo 12 Lunar Module (LM) during the mission’s first extravehicular activity (EVA) on Nov. 19, 1969. Credit: NASA.

The damage was mitigated by the fact that Surveyor 3 was sitting in a crater below the landing site of the Apollo 12 LM. Another example is the Apollo 15 mission that landed in the Hadley–Apennine region in 1971. During the LM’s descent, astronauts David R. Scott and James B. Irwin could not see the landing site because their exhaust plume had created a thick cloud of regolith above it. This forced the crew to select a new landing site on the rim of Béla, an elongated crater to the east of the region. The LM could not achieve a balanced footing at this site and tilted backward 11 degrees before stabilizing itself.

Research conducted since these missions took place led to the conclusion that the scattering was likely caused by collisions between regolith particles. As Sarwar indicated, these examples illustrate how disturbed regolith can become a hazard, especially where other spacecraft and facilities are positioned nearby:

“The above two examples from the Apollo-era were not severe enough to jeopardize mission success. But future Artemis (and CLPS) missions will take place on the lunar south pole, where the soil is assumed to be significantly more porous/weak than the equatorial and mid-latitude Apollo landing regions. Also, Artemis landers are expected to deliver much larger payloads than Apollo, and therefore require more thrust to slow down. As a result, deep cratering can happen (not seen in Apollo) due to rocket exhaust plumes and blow the regolith at much higher angles than those seen previously (~1-3 degrees above ground).”

In accordance with the long-term goals of the Artemis Program, NASA plans to build infrastructure around the southern polar region to allow for a “sustained program of lunar exploration and development.” This includes the Artemis Base Camp, consisting of a foundation surface habitat, a habitable mobility platform, a lunar terrain vehicle (LTV), and the Lunar Gateway in orbit. “As such, protecting humans, structures, or nearby spacecraft from the hazards of lunar regolith particles is of paramount concern,” said Sarwar.

Illustration of NASA astronauts on the lunar South Pole. Mission ideas we see today have at least some heritage from the early days of the Space Age. Credit: NASA

Similar research has shown how clouds of regolith caused by landing and take-off could also pose a hazard to the safe operation of the Lunar Gateway and lunar orbiters. These threats have driven considerable research into how lunar dust can be mitigated during future missions. As noted, Sarwar and Hasnain used the soft sphere method to evaluate the risks posed by particle-particle collisions:

“In this method, adjacent particles are allowed to overlap each other by a tiny amount, which is taken as an indirect measure of the deformation expected in a real particle-particle collision. This overlap value, along with relevant material properties of lunar regolith, are then used in a spring-dashpot-friction slider representation to calculate forces in each collision event. The inelasticity involved in a collision is varied from completely inelastic to highly elastic.

“Our results reveal that highly elastic collisions between relatively large regolith grains (~100 microns) cause a significant portion of them to eject at large angles (some can fly out at ~90 degrees). The rest of the grains are, however, contained in a small-angle region (<3 degrees) along the ground – which is in line with the visible regolith sheet observed during the Apollo missions.”

In terms of safeguards, Sarwar and Hasnain suggest that berms or fences around a landing zone are a way to mitigate ejecta sprays. However, as their research suggests, a certain percentage of regolith particles may scatter at large angles due to collisions, making berns or fencing insufficient. “A better solution for future Artemis missions would be to build a landing pad,” said Sarwar. “In this regard, a multi-organization team with personnel from both academia (including Dr. Hasnain) and industry is working on developing the in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique, or FAST landing pads.”

The FAST method envisions lunar landers equipped with alumina particles that are ejected during landing maneuvers. They are then liquefied by engine plumes to create molten aluminum on the lunar surface, which cools and solidifies to create a stable landing surface. NASA has also investigated how landing pads could be built using sintering technology, where regolith is blasted with microwaves to create molten ceramics that harden on contact with space. Another idea is to build landing pads with blast walls to contain ejected regolith, which the Texas-based construction company ICON included in their Lunar Lantern habitat concept.

Illustration of the in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique (FAST). Credit: Masten Space Systems

Alas, experimental investigations concerning lunar regolith are very difficult because lunar conditions are vastly different than those on Earth. This includes the lower gravity (roughly 16.5% of Earth’s), the vacuum environment, and the extreme temperature variations. Hence why researchers are forced to rely heavily on numerical modeling, which typically focuses on plume forces and largely ignores the role of particle collisions. But as Sanwar noted, their research offers valuable insight and illustrates why it is important to consider this often-overlooked phenomenon when planning future lunar missions:

“[However,] our research on particle collisions has shown that this is a very important phenomenon to consider for accurate regolith trajectory prediction and, therefore, must be included. There are still a lot of challenges remaining in this area, such as a lack of knowledge on regolith particle restitution coefficient (which determines energy loss in a collision), effects of regolith size distribution, implications of turbulent plumes etc. We hope to elucidate some of these uncertainties in the future and contribute towards a more comprehensive lunar PSI model for safer Artemis lunar landings.”

Further Reading: Acta Astronautica

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Technology

For politicians, AI will deliver salvation or damnation — however nothing in between

Is AI a panacea or a Pandora’s box? It’s a question that divides the British government.

Ask the deputy prime minister, Oliver Dowden, and he’ll fill your ears with promises about a glorious future.

AI is a “game-changer” that can “revolutionise public services,” Dowden gushed yesterday. Healthcare, education, and crime prevention are all prime targets for the technological transformation — and that’s just the start.

“I could go on nearly forever to cover all areas of public administration,” Dowden threatened. “Because there are very few areas of the public sector that don’t have the potential to be enhanced by these tools.”

Naturally, those tools can also reduce the need for pesky human employees. As part of the grand plans, the government will spend £110mn on AI tools and technical staff to automate “dogsbody work” — and eliminate boatloads of civil service jobs.

TNW Conference 2024 – Group ticket offer

Save up to 40% with our Group offer and join Europe’s leading tech festival in June!

“We need to really embrace this stuff to drive the numbers down,” Dowden said.

And that’s merely one of the deputy PM’s automation dreams. “AI is potentially — and I don’t say this lightly,” he claimed, “— a silver bullet.”

His colleagues, however, don’t all share his unbridled faith. Just days before Dowden shared his sublime vision, the home secretary, James Cleverly, delivered a very different message. In an interview with the London Times, Cleverly warned that criminals and “malign actors” working for rival states could use AI to fix this year’s general election.

“The era of deepfake and AI-generated content to mislead and disrupt is already in play,” he said.

Such anxieties add a sad note to Dowden’s rhapsody. But the contrasting tones are unsurprising — even from within the same government.

Whether they’re positive or negative, politicians have become enraptured by AI extremes. They provide the powerful solutions, the petrifying problems, and the pithy slogans that every government desires. Any ambiguities or middle grounds, by contrast, are undesirable distractions.

In reality, of course, AI is neither good nor bad; what matters is how it’s deployed. Unfortunately, the guardrails for deployment are being built by the likes of Dowden and Cleverly.

Categories
Sport

Cam Newton apologizes for function in youth soccer scuffle

Cam Newton apologized for his role in a scuffle at a 7-on-7 youth football tournament over the weekend, saying “there’s no excuse” for his actions.

Video from the Atlanta tournament surfaced Sunday that showed Newton being shoved by three people near the top of a set of steps before the pushing, shoving and grabbing moved toward a fence line. The video lasted less than 30 seconds before the altercation was broken up by a police officer and event security personnel.

Editor’s Picks

Speaking about the incident on an episode of his YouTube show “4th and 1” that was published Friday, Newton said he “let my emotions get the best of me.”

“It should not have been called for. Simple. And with that, I apologize to anybody affected,” Newton said, naming event organizers, players and parents among those he was issuing his apology to.

Newton, the No. 1 pick in the 2011 NFL draft out of Auburn, did not appear to throw any punches in the video and seemed to be fending off three other people.

It was not clear what started the altercation. Newton did not directly explain that in his show, saying only that the situation “starts with words and it should have ended with words.”

He also acknowledged that the scuffle could have gotten worse and that his involvement makes it harder for him to act as an example to younger players.

“I can’t sit up there and say, ‘Hey, bro, you got to be bigger than that,’ and then all of a sudden I do that — and that just goes to show you you’ve got to always stay in control of your emotions,” he said.

Newton hasn’t played in the NFL since 2021, when he spent a portion of the season with the Carolina Panthers, the same team that drafted him.

He has played 11 seasons in the NFL, throwing for more than 32,000 yards and 194 touchdowns. He also ran for 75 touchdowns during his time with the Panthers and New England Patriots.

Newton, who is from Atlanta, runs C1N, an organization founded in 2021 that focuses on developing young athletes’ skills in football by providing opportunities to compete at the highest level through 7-on-7 tournaments and other events, according to Newton’s website. His 15-and-under team won the championship at the event, according to a post by Newton on X.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Categories
Science

Europe’s Consensus on Local weather Is Crumbling – Watts Up With That?

From CLIMATE DEPOT

By Marc Morano

BY WOLFGANG MÜNCHAU

At stake in the European elections in June this year will be everything that defines the modern EU: a large volume of net zero legislation, a values-based foreign policy, and ever-more intrusive business regulation.

Polls suggest the centrist majority that has supported these policies is growing slimmer. [emphasis, links added]

Ursula von der Leyen [pictured above] has been the quintessential representative of that majority. Born in Brussels, German by nationality, proposed by France, she was the perfect candidate for European Commission president in late 2019.

Now she is seeking a second term. Whether she will succeed will depend to a large extent on whether the centrist four-party coalition that supported her in 2019 will hold.

All over Europe, we are now seeing a backlash against the kind of policies the Von der Leyen Commission represents.

The far right is part of that response, but the main political shift has been inside Von der Leyen’s own political group, the European People’s Party (EPP), of which the German CDU/CSU is the largest member.

This backlash follows one of the most hectic political phases in recent EU history. When Covid struck in early 2020, Von der Leyen was instrumental in setting up the EU’s recovery fund to help countries deal with the economic consequences of the pandemic.

Then came the Green Deal, a hefty tranche of legislation on renewable energy, land use, forestry, energy efficiency, emission standards for cars and trucks, and a directive on energy taxes.

There was also a tightening of standards on pesticides, air quality, water pollution, and wastewater.

Farmers are resisting this program because it affects their livelihoods. Industrialists, too, are unhappy. A big part of the Green Deal was its industrial policy; the flagship legislation was the Net Zero Industry Act.

The industry used to be the EU’s strongest supporter.

But with the new laws came new bureaucracy: now, all EU-funded investment must include a green component of at least 30 percent, while a carbon border adjustment mechanism, to take effect in 2026, will penalize imports that do not meet EU carbon-emission standards. Together, EU legislation in the last few years amounts to a near-total corporate regime change.

Compliance with some regulations is virtually impossible for companies without dedicated legal teams. It is going to get worse.

Under discussion right now is a supply-chain law that would make European companies responsible for human rights abuses in their supply chain – including the suppliers of their suppliers.

I expect that the hyperactive phase of this green agenda will end with the elections in June. Some of it might even go into reverse. I am even starting to doubt whether the EU will ever enforce the 2035 target for phasing out fossil-fuel-driven cars.

This is an industrial-policy disaster in the making because Europe’s carmakers are having trouble selling their electric cars.

It is instructive to look at what happened to Green politics in Germany. The coalition of the center-left SPD, the Greens, and the liberal FDP started with great enthusiasm in 2021 but is now hopelessly divided.

After a string of unpopular laws, Germany’s anti-Green surge has been in full force for some time. Both the far-right AfD and Sahra Wagenknecht’s new left-populist party have identified the Greens as their main opponent.

They depict them as members of metropolitan elites forcing their urban values on rural communities. The language suggests parallels with Brexit. As the EU is associated with partisan policies of the center-left, opposition to those policies and opposition to the EU are starting to merge.

It was the sudden abolition of a diesel subsidy for agricultural vehicles that led farmers to protest in Germany. But their discontent goes deeper.

What is happening all over Europe is the first organized revolt against the green agenda. The center-right has discovered that there are votes to be had by opposing green policies. Farmers and rural communities are starting to fight back.

A consequence of this is that the centrist coalition is no longer viable. This is a healthy development. When centrist parties always form coalitions with one another, we should not be surprised to see parties emerge on the fringes.

The centrists’ reaction to the rise of the far right has been to erect firewalls – by simply refusing to engage with such parties.

This might work to begin with. But when the far right exceeds certain thresholds in support, as it has in Germany, such firewalls cannot withstand the electoral arithmetic.

In Brussels, the firewall is cracking. The EPP has already opened up to the European Conservatives and Reformists group, whose most influential member is Giorgia Meloni, the hard-right Italian prime minister, who has said she will support Von der Leyen.

Meloni’s big issue is immigration: I would not rule out the idea of Von der Leyen once again assembling a majority; what I struggle to imagine is a coalition that encompasses both the left and Meloni.

It is not clear whether Renew Europe, the liberal grouping in the European Parliament, will still support Von der Leyen. Support for liberal parties is weakening everywhere, including in France.

Mark Rutte’s Party for Freedom and Democracy lost last year’s election in the Netherlands. The German FDP is fighting for its political survival within the coalition in Berlin. Von der Leyen’s hyperactive green industrial agenda is the antithesis of what conservative-liberal parties such as the FDP are standing for.

And herein lies the ultimate irony. If Ursula von der Leyen were to win a second term, she would spend most of it undoing what she did in her first.

Read more at New Statesman

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Health

Change Healthcare cyberattack has triggered monetary ‘mess’ for docs

Small private practices and health-care providers are facing mounting financial pressures as crucial reimbursement systems remain down for the ninth day, following the cyberattack on Change Healthcare. 

Change Healthcare offers tools for payment and revenue cycle management that help facilitate transactions between providers and most major insurance companies. Its parent company UnitedHealth Group discovered that a cyber threat actor breached part of the unit’s information technology network on Feb. 21, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 

As a result, the company isolated and disconnected the impacted systems “immediately upon detection” of the threat, the filing said.

The fallout has caused a ripple of disruption across the U.S. health-care system. 

Doctors told CNBC the outage has left them unable to check patients’ eligibility for treatment or fill prescriptions electronically, which has created more administrative responsibility for workers that are already overwhelmed by clerical work. Perhaps more importantly, providers have been unable to receive reimbursements from insurers, effectively grinding many health systems’ revenue cycles to a halt. 

Smaller and mid-sized practices that rely on reimbursement cash flow to operate are making tough decisions about how to stay afloat. If the outage drags on for too long, experts say some practices may have to close their doors for good.

Dr. Purvi Parikh, an allergist and immunologist with a private practice in New York City, told CNBC that the breach has been a “mess” and a “big stressor.” Like many others, she said her practice hasn’t been able to receive reimbursements from insurers for patient visits, which makes it difficult for the practice to pay for operational expenses like payroll and medical supplies. 

Switching to a new platform could take weeks, Parikh said, so there’s no immediate workaround available. As of Thursday, Change Healthcare has not shared any updates about when it expects its systems to be back online.

“The most frustrating part is that nobody has any answers or solutions,” Parikh said. “We’re kind of just stuck.” 

Change Healthcare on Thursday said that ransomware group Blackcat is behind the attack. Blackcat, also called Noberus and ALPHV, steals sensitive data from institutions and threatens to publish it unless a ransom is paid, according to a December release from the U.S. Department of Justice. 

The company said it is working with law enforcement and third party consultants like Mandiant, which is owned by Google, and cybersecurity software vendor Palo Alto Networks to assess the breach.

“Patient care is our top priority and we have multiple workarounds to ensure people have access to the medications and the care they need,” Change Healthcare said in a statement to CNBC.

Dr. Kiranjit Khalsa, an allergist and immunologist who runs an independent practice in Scottsdale, Arizona, said her staff has been working longer hours to try and accommodate the extra work as a result of the breach, as well as manually calling in prescriptions.    

She said the problems around reimbursement have been the “biggest burden,” since she is worried about how she can continue to support her patients and employees. Khalsa is considering cutting back hours for staff and even closing the clinic for a few days.

“I worry about providing for them,” Khalsa told CNBC in an interview. “I also worry about: Where am I going to get this money if it does not come through? Do I need to take a loan out to keep the clinic afloat?”

Even when Change Healthcare’s systems do come back online, there are a lot of unanswered questions about what will happen next, according to Dr. Dan Inder Sraow, an interventional cardiologist who owns a private practice around Phoenix, Arizona. He said it’s not clear whether Change Healthcare will take on the responsibility of processing all the claims or if he’ll need to hire additional staff to help. 

“I don’t think that people are aware that the actual people providing the services are not able to extract revenue for those services,” Dr. Sraow told CNBC. “We don’t know how long that’s going to be, and that’s such a dangerous, dangerous thing.”

Dr. Jesse Ehrenfeld, president of the American Medical Association, said he has spent days fielding calls from concerned colleagues.

He said he spoke with one doctor who runs an oncology practice and only has up to two weeks’ worth of cash on hand. If the outage drags out, the practice won’t be able to buy the chemotherapy that its patients depend on for treatment. 

Since many providers are operating on razor-thin margins, Ehrenfeld said there is a possibility that some will go out of business. 

“We have so many practices that are on the fringe, particularly smaller practices, where they are just scraping by,” Ehrenfeld told CNBC in an interview. “Any aberration in the system where, ‘Oh, you don’t get checks for two weeks,’ obviously is a situation that does put practices at risk.”

In 2022, Change Healthcare merged with the provider Optum, which services more than 100 million patients in the U.S. and is owned by UnitedHealth, the country’s biggest health-care company by market cap.

The American Medical Association vocally opposed the merger, writing in a letter to the DOJ that the union could stifle competition, give UnitedHealth access to large data stores and potentially disrupt patient care. 

The merger ultimately went through, but the DOJ has recently launched an antitrust investigation into UnitedHealth, according to a Wall Street Journal report Tuesday.

“It’s just sort of like a perfect storm of regulatory issues [and] lack of competition — and unfortunately, the people who are really going to suffer are patients and individuals who work in the healthcare system,” said Dr. Ravi Parikh, a retina specialist that owns and operates a practice in New York City.  

The cyberattack has left Parikh’s clinic without a way to receive reimbursements for the expensive medications it administers. He said he has been thinking about contingency plans, such as seeking out cheaper medications and asking some patients to pay upfront, but his focus is on providing the best care possible. 

“The health care system could eventually come to a halt because a lot of clinics and pharmacies might not be viable,” Parikh said. 

Categories
Entertainment

Mother’s BF Arrested After Florida Teen Madeline Soto Goes Lacking

Madeline Soto, a 13-year-old from Florida, has been missing since Monday (Feb. 26). Now, her mother’s boyfriend, Stephan Sterns, is reportedly a prime suspect in her disappearance, per multiple reports.

Please Share! A Florida MISSING CHILD Alert has been issued for 13-year-old Madeline Soto last seen in Orlando. If you have any information, please contact the Orange County Sheriff’s Office at 407-254-7000 or 911. pic.twitter.com/P3DPplQo7p

— FDLE (@fdlepio) February 27, 2024

Mom’s BF Arrested For Possessing “Disturbing” Child Content

On Wednesday, the Orange County Sheriff’s Office arrested Sterns after uncovering inappropriate child content on his phone. They’ve charged Sterns with sexual battery and possession of child sexual abuse material, per NBC News.

Authorities uncovered the inappropriate material while investigating Madeline Soto’s disappearance. Detectives on the case say Stephan had “disturbing images” and “criminal and sexual in nature” videos on his phone.

It’s unclear if the content found in Sterns phone features his girlfriend’s 13-year-old daughter. However, forensics determined that the crimes in his phone were committed at their family home in Kissimmee, Florida. Stephan Sterns had reportedly made attempts to delete the content, but police were able to retrieve it.

Sterns’ arrest isn’t in direct connection to Madeline’s disappearance. Nonetheless, given this development, police have now named him a prime suspect while she remains missing.

What Police Know About Madeline Soto’s Disappearance

Stephan Sterns was reportedly the last person to see Madeline Soto at about 8:30 a.m. Monday. The 37-year-old dropped Madeline Soto off a few blocks from her school, Hunters Middle School in Orlando, Florida, Sheriff John Mina revealed. 

But when her mother went to scoop her after school, she was told her daughter didn’t attend on Monday. That night, police began the search for the teen. The blond-haired, blue-eyed child was last wearing a green sweatshirt, black shorts and white Crocs.

So why wasn’t she dropped off at school? Mina said the child was likely “embarrassed” by her stepfather’s vehicle.

Kissimmee and Orange County Sheriff’s Office (OCSO) officials interrogated Stephan Sterns on Wednesday night. But Sterns chose to invoke his right to a lawyer before police subsequently arrested him.

“Stephan Sterns had an opportunity tonight to come clean with detectives and help lead them to information about Maddie’s disappearance,” OCSO Sheriff Mina said. “Her loved ones deserve answers and OCSO and the Kissimmee Police will not stop until we find Maddie.”

MAJOR DEVELOPMENT in the case of missing 13-year-old Madeline Soto:
 
This evening, the Kissimmee Police Department, working in conjunction with the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, arrested Stephan Sterns, 37, for sexual battery and possession of child sexual abuse material.… pic.twitter.com/yZn8O8JpYM

— Orange County Sheriff’s Office (@OrangeCoSheriff) February 29, 2024

Police Also Exploring Another Reason For Maddie’s Disappearance

Police have also been investigating another possible alternative: that Madeline ran away. A search of her cell phone, which was recovered from the family home Monday, shows she previously expressed the desire to “live in the woods” after turning 13. Her 13th birthday was on Feb. 22, just days before she disappeared.

Search efforts, including in some woods near her school, have come up empty.

It’s unclear if Madeline’s mother has been in contact with Stephan Sterns since his arrest.

RELATED: Missing N.C. Teen Rescued After Using Hand Gestures She Learned From TikTok To Signal For Help