Categories
Entertainment

Low cost Health Merchandise That Really Work

We independently selected these deals and products because we love them, and we think you might like them at these prices. E! has affiliate relationships, so we may get a commission if you purchase something through our links. Items are sold by the retailer, not E!. Prices are accurate as of publish time.

Sometimes it’s hard to get into your fitness groove. Who has time to go to the gym? Who can afford fancy gym equipment? Trust me, same. That’s why I’m always looking for that Goldilocks fitness product – something that will get me on track and won’t break the bank. If you’re also on the hunt for such a thing, you’re in luck. I’ve scoured the Internet and tapped into my own successes, to bring you a roundup of cheap fitness products that actually work – and they’re backed by tons of glowing 5-star reviews. You can use these items at home, keep them in your gym bag for when you do hit the gym, or even take them outside, they’re that versatile.

And, best of all, they’re all on sale. How? Well, Amazon’s Big Spring Sale is happening from now until March 25th, with unbelievable deals on fitness, home, tech, fashion, and beauty items. But, don’t wait until the last minute, items are selling out fast. You don’t want to miss these versatile exercise bands for just $6, and a Pilates ball for $9.

What are you waiting for? Keep scrolling and fill your cart with the best cheap fitness products that will help you get the results you want.

Categories
Health

We’re shopping for extra of this health-care firm amid an overdone sell-off

Attendees walk by the Abbott booth during CES 2024 at the Las Vegas Convention Center on January 10, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Ethan Miller | Getty Images

Shortly after the opening bell, we will be buying 140 shares of Abbott Laboratories at roughly $112. Following the trade, Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust will own 700 shares of ABT, increasing our weighting in the portfolio to 2.42% from 1.95%.

We are buying more Abbott Laboratories into its recent weakness as we continue to believe the market is overestimating the risk of infant formula litigation.

Abbott shares began its slide Friday after a jury ordered Reckitt Benckiser to pay $60 million to a plaintiff whose premature baby died of necrotizing enterocolitis, also known as NEC, after being fed Reckitt’s Enfamil formula. Abbott was not involved in this case.

Whenever headlines like this break, the market tends to shoot first and ask questions later. In this example, the market looked at Abbott’s roughly 1,000 pending lawsuits and multiplied it by the $60 million payout to one plaintiff — who was seeking a smaller figure of $25 million — and calculated that Abbott’s worst-case scenario exposure could be as much as $60 billion.

Here is Abbott’s official statement: “Abbott has spent decades researching, developing, testing and producing formulas and fortifiers for premature infants, and countless infants have benefitted tremendously from these products. These allegations are without merit, advancing a theory promoted by plaintiffs lawyers rather than the medical community, which considers these products part of the standard of care for premature infants.”

There are a few key things to know from this statement. First, there is no scientific data that shows Abbott’s formula causes NEC even though the pending lawsuits allege these premature infants developed NEC as a result of the baby formula. Second, premature infants don’t have many feeding options for nutrition beyond Abbott’s and Reckitt’s products. It’s the standard of care because there is a lack of alternatives. This is a completely different situation from Johnson & Johnson‘s talc litigation.

Since the news broke, Abbott’s stock price has fallen roughly 6%, compared with 1.4% gain in the S&P 500, and has lost about $14 billion of market cap. We are not lawyers, but this decline looks way too excessive based on the facts around the situation.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

Abbott Labs’ stock performance over the past month.

In the event Abbott tries to settle all of the outstanding lawsuits, the final number would likely be far below the market cap the company has lost, making this recent pullback a buying opportunity. We also bought some Abbott stock on Friday.

Wall Street analysts have weighed in on the matter.

JPMorgan said last week they think “the ultimate number would likely be substantially less than the $60 billion implied…we’d put the number at a small fraction at best in many years from now.”

In Evercore ISI’s scenario analysis based on historical context, analysts think a settlement could be well under $250 million based on current cases outstanding. Wells Fargo is in similar territory. The firm estimated a potential settlement of roughly $280 million based on their assumptions of recent litigation settlement efforts.

Meanwhile, Jefferies analysts wrote, “the ultimate outcome is difficult to determine, but would most likely result in a manageable fine for ABT.”

We don’t want to make light of the situation because NEC is terrible. And we can’t ignore the overhang this news has created around Abbott Labs, a high-quality health-care company that has a lot more going for it beyond baby formula. It could linger for some time. However, when we compare the billions of lost market capitalization over the past week to what a settlement could potentially look like, our conclusion is that this sell-off is overdone. 

(Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long ABT. See here for a full list of the stocks.)

As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade.

THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY, TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER.  NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB.  NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.

Categories
Science

China’s Subsequent Lunar Relay Satellite tv for pc Blasts Off

Communication between spacecraft relies upon line of site technology, if anything is in the way, communication isn’t possible. Exploration of the far side of the Moon is a great example where future explorers would be unable to communicate directly with Earth.  The only way around this is to use relay satellites and the Chinese Space Agency is on the case. The first Queqiao-1 was able to co-ordinate communications with Chang’e-4 landers and now they are sending Queqiao-2 to support the Change’e-6 mission. 

If you have ever gazed upon the Moon you might have noticed that it always has the same hemisphere facing the Earth. This phenomenon is known as captured or synchronous rotation. It may look like the Moon isn’t rotating but in reality the time it takes to spin once on its axis is the same as the time it takes to complete one orbit around the Earth, keeping one hemisphere constantly facing us. Explorers on the near side of the Moon have no trouble communicating with transmissions taking just over one second to reach home. Explore the far side of the Moon and you have a problem. 

The Chang’e 5 test vehicle captured this beautiful view of Earth over the far side of the Moon on October 28, 2014. Credit: Chinese national space agency (CNSA) and Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)

To overcome the problem China have launched a 1.2 ton communication satellite known as Queqiao-2. It’s name originates from the mythological bridge made from magpies. In the Chinese tale, the magpies formed a bridge across the Milky Way to allow the lovers Vega and Altair to be together for one night once a year. Two miniature satellites were also launched Tiandu-1 and Tiandu-2 from the island of Hainan.

On arrival it will orbit the Moon and provide a relay for the Chang’e-6 lander which is slated to launch in May.  It will join satellites from United States, India and Japan to support the exploration of the far side of the Moon. Chang’e-6 will collected samples from an ancient basin. Not only will it serve the communications for Change-6, it will transfer communications for Chang’e-7 and ‘8. Both craft are to be launched in the years ahead 2026 and 2028 respectively. 

The orbit of Queqiao-2 will take it almost over the south pole in an elliptical orbit. It will reach an altitude of 8,600 km so that communication can be achieved for a little over eight hours. At its closest, it will sweep over the lunar surface at an altitude of 300 km.

The ultimate goal of the Chinese Space Agency is to create a network of satellites, not too dissimilar (but not quite on the same scale) to the growing Space X constellation which is building a global internet presence. The purpose of Tiandu-1 and Tiandu-2 is to test the concept of such a constellation. 

China’s longer term aspirations include a research station at the lunar south pole and for this to be viable, communication relays are essential to establish communication, navigation and remote sensing. 

Source : China launches signal relay satellite for mission to moon’s hidden side

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Sport

Colorado grinds out victory over Boise State in First 4

  • Adam Rittenberg, ESPN Senior WriterMar 21, 2024, 01:28 AM ET

    Close

    • College football reporter.
    • Joined ESPN.com in 2008.
    • Graduate of Northwestern University.

DAYTON, Ohio — As an ugly game at UD Arena swayed back and forth, Colorado seemed likely to finish on the wrong end of it.

All-Pac-12 guard KJ Simpson couldn’t hit a shot. The Buffaloes continued to let Boise State grab offensive rebounds. The Broncos, 0-9 in NCAA tournament games, were far from impressive but had built a four-point lead with 5:35 to play. An elusive March win was finally in sight.

Colorado coach Tad Boyle called a timeout.

“KJ was really positive, which I thought was great because you need that positivity in the NCAA tournament when you go down four late,” Boyle said. “And we got five straight stops in a row.”

Editor’s Picks

2 Related

Stunning defense and newfound shot-making tilted the game one final time in Colorado’s favor. The 10th-seeded Buffaloes dominated the final stanza against fellow No. 10 seed Boise State, winning 60-53 in a First Four matchup on Wednesday night.

Colorado advanced in the South region and will face No. 7 seed Florida on Friday afternoon in Indianapolis.

“It’s just all about having short-term memory,” Simpson said. “You build that with experience. Sometimes the ball’s not going to go in the basket, but there’s so much more to basketball than just offense.”

Simpson rebounded his miss and scored with 5:18 left, which Boise State coach Leon Rice called “a huge, huge play.” Simpson scored 10 of his 19 points down the stretch, and Colorado held Boise State scoreless for more than four minutes.

“He always figures out a different way to score even if it’s not shooting,” center Eddie Lampkin Jr. said of Simpson, who added a team-high 11 rebounds. “If he’ll be a leader, we’ll win a lot of games, and that’s what he’s been.”

Lampkin, Colorado’s energy source in the post, had 13 points on 6-of-8 shooting, none bigger than a putback of an air ball to beat the shot clock and put Colorado up 54-49 with 32.8 seconds left.

“That offensive rebound was, to me, the play of the game,” Boyle said. “To go from a one-possession game to a two-possession game, just mentally, is really, really positive for the team that does that. I won’t say it’s demoralizing, but the other team, a little bit of panic sets in.”

Boise State dropped to 0-10 in the NCAA tournament, the worst mark among teams in this year’s event and the second-worst behind Iona, which is 0-16 (the team had a win vacated in 1980). The Broncos lost in the First Four for the third time.

They grabbed 19 offensive rebounds and flustered Simpson for most of the night. But their own shooting doomed them. Boise State made only one 3-pointer in each half, finishing 2-of-18. The Broncos missed numerous shots around the rim. Colorado’s Tristan da Silva used his length to fluster Boise State star forward Tyson Degenhart, while recording a game-high 20 points and hitting several baskets late in the shot clock. Besides Degenhart, other Broncos scorers struggled, too. Max Rice and O’Mar Stanley combined to go 2-of-18 from the field.

“You just got to keep fighting and every day get better, and if we can put on a better team next year, you go farther,” said Rice, who fell to 0-5 in tournament games, tied for the fifth-most losses by a coach without a win. “There’s always the next mile, the next hurdle, the next milestone, but it doesn’t mean that this team didn’t accomplish a heck of a lot because they sure did.”

Colorado won its 25th game, most in team history, but players aren’t satisfied.

“It means a lot, but we’ve got to get one more, though,” Lampkin said. “This was just the start. It’s a good win, but we got to get the next one on Friday.”

Categories
Technology

This startup is constructing AI that may fly drones and make its personal selections

The debate on how far artificial intelligence can go revolves around questions about what actually constitutes human intelligence, and can a machine function similarly enough to a human brain?

While not shooting for AGI, UK-based Stanhope AI is building its models according to neuroscience principles, and using the predictive, hierarchic machinery that make up our brains for inspiration. 

The result is an AI that doesn’t need training. It basically just needs to be told that it exists, provided a prior system of beliefs  — and then take off (literally) into the real world and learn from its surroundings using sensors. Not unlike how you see, hear, and feel things that expand your knowledge, causing you to update (or reinforce) your worldview.

A spinout from University College London, the startup just raised £2.3mn for its neuroscience-inspired “agentic AI.” We caught up with co-founder and CEO, professor of computational neuroscience Rosalyn Moran, to learn more about the startup’s tech and vision for the future.

The layered ‘brain’ of Stanhope’s AI 

TNW Conference 2024, June 20-21 – Exclusive Group Promotion – Ends March 29!

The ultimate team-building experience: Buy 2, get 1 FREE – Buy 3-4, get 2 FREE – Buy 5+, get 3 FREE!

Stanhope AI’s method builds on a theory that says that the brain has a model of the world, and is continuously trying to gather evidence to validate and update said model. 

“The AI has a ‘brain’ a few levels deep, and at the very bottom of the brain are its sensors,” Moran explains. The sensors, which for you and me would be our eyes, in this case are cameras and LiDAR. 

“And then those feed into a predictive layer that will try and say, ‘Okay, I saw a wall over there. Now I don’t need to keep looking’. And it’s built into a more interesting cognitive prediction at the higher levels. So it’s very much like a hierarchical brain.”

This is the same kind of prediction that our human brains engage in in order to make sense of the world and save energy (the brain is the most energy-demanding organ we have). This is a neuroscience principle called “active inference,” part of the Free Energy Theory, developed by Moran’s co-founder, professor of theoretical neurobiology, Karl Friston. 

“I don’t need to check every pixel on the wall to make sure it’s a wall — I can fill in a bit. So that’s why we think the human brain is so efficient,” Moran adds.

Essentially, the way you experience the world is a result of how your brain predicts you will see it, in the service of energy efficiency. But credit to our brains, they then refines those predictions based on incoming sensory data. Stanhope AI’s model does the same, using the visual input from the world around it. It then makes autonomous decisions based on the new, real-time data. 

No massive training data sets required 

Using this approach to AI differs significantly from traditional machine learning methods such as those used to train LLMs, which can only operate with the data they are provided by those who train them.

“We don’t train [our model],” Moran says. “The heavy lifting is done in establishing the generative model, and making sure that it is correct and has consistent priors with where you might want it to operate.”

This is all theoretically fascinating, but for a startup to spin out of the lab, there needs to be real-world applications. Stanhope AI says that its AI can sit on autonomous machines, such as delivery drones and robots. The tech is currently in testing on drones with partners including Germany’s Federal Agency for Disruptive Innovation and the Royal Navy.

The greatest technological challenge the startup surmounted thus far was scaling from smaller models working in lab settings, to larger ones that can learn to navigate a much more expansive landscape.

“We had to use three mathematical routes to do free energy calculations that were much more efficient, so that we could build much larger worlds for our drones,” Moran states. She also adds that finding the right hardware that the company could access and control without having to rely on third parties also presented a significant engineering hurdle. 

New wave of agentic AI

Stanhope AI’s “Active Inference Models” are, the company says, truly autonomous and can rebuild and refine their predictions. This is part of a new wave of “agentic AI” which are, just as the human brain, always trying to “guess what will happen next” by continuously learning from discrepancies between predictions and real-time data. There is no need for extensive (and expensive) prior training, and the approach also lowers the risk of AI “hallucinations.” 

Notably, Stanhope’s AI are white box models, with the “explainability built into its architecture.” As Moran elaborates, “We make sure that it’s working absolutely perfectly in simulation. If the AI, or the drone, does something strange then we really drill down on what it believed there, why it did what it did. So it’s a very different way of developing AI.” The idea, she says, is to transform the capabilities of AI and robotics and make them more impactful in real-world scenarios.

The UCL Technology Fund led Stanhope AI’s £2.3mn funding round. Creator Fund, MMC Ventures, Moonfire Ventures, and Rockmount Capital also participated, along with several industry investors.

Stanhope AI was founded in 2021 by Professor Rosalyn Moran, Director Professor Karl Friston and Technical Advisor Dr Biswa Sengupta.

Categories
Science

New York Local weather Plan Wants Publicly Funded Spin Physician – Watts Up With That?

Roger Caiazza

This is another article about New York’s climate “leadership” that I fear will trickle down to a state near you.  Ken Girardin from the Empire Center breaks the story of New York’s latest attempt to shore up public support for the Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act (Climate Act).  This article explains that the State “is especially concerned about certain areas of the climate program, noting they should be able to “immediately address emerging unforeseen events that draw media scrutiny”.

The Climate Act established a New York “Net Zero” target (85% reduction in GHG emissions and 15% offset of emissions) by 2050.  Despite the enormous impacts to energy affordability, threats to electric system reliability, and mandates affecting personal energy choices I believe many New Yorkers are unaware of the law. In 2023 transition recommendations were supposed to be implemented through regulation, Public Service Commission orders, and legislation.  Not surprisingly, the aspirational schedule of the Climate Act has proven to be more difficult to implement than planned. 

NYS Seeks Spin Doctor To Fight Climate Law Critics

Girardin discovered that the New York State Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA) are hiring a public relations outfit, using $500,000 per year of public money, to “maintain a positive narrative” and “respond to negative viewpoints” about the state’s Climate Act. 

NYSERDA has been charged with supporting the technical analyses that are supporting the development and deployment of the Scoping Plan that outlines how to “achieve the State’s bold clean energy and climate agenda.”  In brief, that plan is to electrify everything possible using zero-emissions electricity. Many aspects of the transition are falling behind, and the magnitude of the required actions is coming into focus. As a result, enough questions are being asked that the State has decided it needs to respond.

Girardin notes that the  just-released request for proposal from the New York State Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA) seeks: 

public relations professionals or public relations firms interested in providing public relations/communications services to advance the goals of NYSERDA and the Climate Leadership Community and Protection Act (Climate Act) by building awareness of and support for the Climate Act and assisting in developing a narrative around New York State’s clean energy and climate priorities and providing rapid response communications services, if necessary.

He describes the genesis of the problem and current situation:

The law was passed without anything close to a cost estimate or feasibility study, and five years into its implementation, the Climate Act has created headaches for state officials. Among other things, the state Department of Environmental Conservation has blown off a statutory deadline to implement related regulations that would, among other things, ban replacement gas appliances and fossil-fuel furnaces and impose an economywide tax-like charge on businesses responsible for greenhouse gas emissions.

None of the reports or analyses have provided a transparent full disclosure of the assumptions, expected emission reductions, and costs for the implementation of control strategies.  What is clear however is that NYSERDA has glommed on to the Climate Act funding as much as possible.  NYSERDA’s payroll has doubled in the past decade.  It already gets funding from a range of grants, taxes and energy-related charges, and Girardin notes that it’s not clear which would be used to fund this contract. 

NYSERDA already has a sizable communications and marketing operation so this push to bring in outside help is remarkable. Girardin suggests that this proposal is tasked to what the State policy makers must think is a real problem:

The RFP doesn’t just want someone to promote the Climate Act. It specifically seeks someone who can “rapidly respond to negative viewpoints and perceptions about the State’s climate and clean energy goals under the Climate Act, the costs associated with the Climate Act, and challenges to particular policies and programs.” 

Clearly, you can only hide the impacts to the state of a complete transformation of the energy system in the state for so long.  Girardin points out that NYSERDA posted the RFP two weeks after a report from the Empire Center showed “how state officials had violated the law, misrepresented Climate Act costs and made fanciful assumptions about how the electric grid would function in 2030.“  I am not the only one who has been making similar arguments for many months so it is not surprising that these issues are getting traction despite the efforts of NYSERDA to date.

I thought Girardin laid out a strategy to raise issues when he described the primary concerns of the request for proposal (RFP).  If these are their issues of concern then pragmatists like me should be strengthening our arguments about these topics.

The RFP suggests NYSERDA is especially concerned about certain areas of the climate program, noting they should be able to “immediately address emerging unforeseen events that draw media scrutiny” in areas including: 

  • “Questions and concerns on affordability for New Yorkers and direct costs to ratepayers as a result of the State’s clean energy and climate transition” including the cost of the planned “cap-and-invest” system. 
  • “Concerns related to the cost and practicality of supporting building decarbonization, the implementation of codes for same and a phase out of fossil fuels in new construction;” 
  • “Concerns related to transitioning cars, trucks, and SUVs sold in New York to zero emissions, and requiring all school buses in operation in the state to be zero-emission by 2035;” (This last policy, required by a separate state law, has given school districts sticker-shock, both with the cost premium of electric models and the unexpected cost of electricity infrastructure upgrades). 
  • “Challenges with the lithium-ion batteries and the scale up of stationary battery storage systems, as well as related fires, safety issues, and the work of the associated working groups.” 
  • “[A]ddressing the headwinds” related to the state’s large-scale renewable energy projects (and presumably NYSERDA’s decision to let offshore wind developers extort an extra $8 billion or so out of state electricity customers last month). 

Girardin lays out an argument why this RFP is troubling at a higher level that I think is irrefutable.

Encouraging people to use less energy or to participate in state programs can serve the public interest by lowering costs for everyone or improving grid reliability. And educating them about a law’s existence to increase compliance is one thing, but spending public funds to “build support” and challenge accurate criticism sounds more like political speech that taxpayers should not be compelled to fund. If not unconstitutional, it certainly is illiberal. 

What would the response have been if Governor George Pataki had used funds seized from low-level drug offenders to hire flacks to “maintain a positive narrative” that the Rockefeller drug laws were good and shouldn’t be changed? Or if an upstate county had used sales tax revenue to buy billboards to reduce support for the Climate Act, perhaps by telling residents how Climate Act programs to benefit New York City will soon be funded with hidden charges on their electricity bills? 

It’s easy to imagine the—justifiably—breathless tantrums that would have ensued if a different administration had used NYSERDA funds to pressure lawmakers to repeal the state’s ban on natural gas fracking or obstacles to new nuclear power plants.

One of my biggest problems with the state’s implementation plan is the failure to acknowledge the misleading cost-benefit descriptions.  Girardin shares my concern:

NYSERDA deserves extra skepticism because the state has gone to great lengths to keep people in the dark about the Climate Act. Legally required cost estimates for Climate Act programs were never released and the revised State Energy Plan, which would show where costs are headed, is several years overdue. NYSERDA spent a year in court fighting to block the release of a Cuomo-era study which appeared to raise doubts about the costs and feasibility of the state’s climate agenda.  

He concludes that reality will eventually win out:

Ultimately it matters little what people are told about the Climate Act, by NYSERDA or otherwise. New Yorkers will in short order face higher fuel costs, higher property taxes, higher compliance costs and higher electricity rates, interspersed with news about businesses either leaving or cancelling investments because of energy concerns. 

The Climate Act, on its own, will tell people exactly how it works. And that might be what NYSERDA fears most.

Conclusion

As a New Yorker this is yet another embarrassment.  The State’s narrative is that everyone is on board with this fantastic plan that will “encourage other jurisdictions to implement complementary greenhouse gas reduction strategies and provide an example of how such strategies can be implemented”.  It is not clear whether a plan that requires a spin doctor can serve as an example to others.

Despite the embarrassment it is encouraging that the State is scared enough that they have to go this route.  The folks who have ignored this law are starting to wake up as the implementation plans roll out.  Hopefully this is a sign that the inevitable pushback is starting.

Roger Caiazza blogs on New York energy and environmental issues at Pragmatic Environmentalist of New York.  More details on the Climate Leadership & Community Protection Act are available here and an inventory of over 400 articles about the Climate Act is also available.   This represents his opinion and not the opinion of any of his previous employers or any other company with which he has been associated.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Categories
Entertainment

Watch Offset React To Bra Touchdown On His Face Throughout A Present

Whew! Offset reacted with the quickness when a bra landed on his face during a recent performance.

The Atlanta artist took the stage wearing black pants, a black vest, gloves, and dark sunglasses. Whoever threw the bra had good aim because it landed on Offset’s face and mic as he rapped Kodak Black’s ‘ZEZE.’

So, What Did Offset Do About The Bra?

But the ‘Blame It On Set’ rapper looked unfazed and immediately flicked the fan love off his face and mic. Offset watched the cream-colored bra fall to the stage and the area in front of it. And he didn’t miss a beat or bar in the song!

Tune in below to see the moment.

Offset hasn’t reacted to the meme-like video circulating on social media! But, in the comment section of The Shade Room’s post, the roomies were rolling at the bra thrower’s aim!

@mars_wxld wrote, “The fact that it landed right on the mic, I’m screaming!!” 

@optimus_k added, Nah, shawty needa sign with the Cowboys bc that throw was.” 

@enitan_absiola added, “He tossed that bra down like the bra stank.” 

@nicole.sxsx wrote, “They got some good timing and aim.”

@call.me_karma said, “That bra looks like it could belong to his mama or auntie.”  

lilbuckkkkk said, “Thought she was gon get the Drake response.” 

Remember When Fans Showered Drake With Bras On Tour? We Do.

So, what was Drake’s response? Last August, while on his “It’s All A Blur’ tour, fans were showering Drake with the undergarment. His tour stops in the U.S. brought on a battle of the bras. He called out a few of the larger-sized ones, such as the 36G and 36L bras!

By September, the rapper had a HUGE collection of bras, upwards of 50, in all shapes, sizes, colors, and designs!

RELATED: Owner Of 36G Bra, Veronica Correia, Reveals Drake Advised Her To Ignore The “Faceless” Trolls Online
Categories
Health

issues of safety with China-made syringes extra widespread than initially identified

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health has warned that Chinese-made plastic syringes that are distributed in the U.S. have “more widespread” quality control issues than were previously known.

In a safety communication Tuesday, the FDA said it found three Chinese syringe manufacturers were in violation of its regulations.

CNBC has been investigating the issue since November, when the FDA initially announced it was reviewing reports of quality and performance issues with these syringes, including leaks and breakage. After CNBC had been inquiring about the issue for months, the agency released an updated safety communication and its Center for Devices and Radiological Health published a release stating its ongoing evaluation “has confirmed that issues with the quality of plastic syringes made in China and their distribution in the U.S. are more widespread than originally known.”

In its safety communication, the FDA said that on Monday, it sent warning letters to three Chinese manufacturers: Jiangsu Shenli Medical Production Co. Ltd., a China-based manufacturer of plastic syringes, as well as Medline Industries LP and Sol-Millennium Medical Inc., two firms marketing and distributing plastic syringes made in China within the U.S. The letters cite violations related to the sale and distribution of unauthorized plastic syringes made in China that are not cleared by the FDA for use in the U.S. 

In a January statement to CNBC, the agency wrote that in 2023, it received more than 4,000 reports regarding plastic syringe issues, adding that this figure was not limited to just syringes manufactured in China. The agency further wrote that there were “limitations” to this data, such as “incomplete information in the reports” and “potential under-reporting.”

As part of its monthslong investigation, CNBC reviewed hundreds of narratives for syringe medical device reports, or MDRs, which are submissions to the FDA designed to highlight suspected issues or malfunctions associated with medical products.

In the reports CNBC reviewed, which looked at manufacturers beyond those issued the recent warning letters, some customers and physicians say they found “foreign matter” in syringes. Others said they had “multiple needles break off in the vials when drawing up vaccines,” “medication delivering faster than it should,” and that the syringes were “cracked,” among other issues. In one medical device report for Jiangsu Shenli Medical Production, which was one of the manufacturers given a warning letter, a customer reported the syringe was causing “an inaccurate measurement of vaccine.”

The three companies issued warning letters did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. 

According to the FDA’s medical device reporting database, Jiangsu Shenli Medical Production and Sol-Millennium Medical produce plastic syringes for McKesson, a major pharmaceutical manufacturer headquartered in Irving, Texas. 

In its notice, the FDA wrote that U.S. suppliers, consumers and health-care organizations should “immediately transition away” from using plastic syringes manufactured by Jiangsu Caina Medical Co. Ltd. and unauthorized plastic syringes manufactured by Jiangsu Shenli Medical Production unless “absolutely necessary.” In regard to all other plastic syringes manufactured in China, the agency said that they should be used as needed until a transition to another product is possible, and urged that users should monitor for defects. 

McKesson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In addition to Jiangsu Shenli Medical Production and Sol-Millennium Medical, there are other China-based manufacturers that produce plastic syringes for McKesson, according to FDA data. Medical device reports also link Anhui Tiankang Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Jiangsu Caina Medical, Suzhou Linhwa Medical Devices Co. Ltd. and Shanghai Kindly Enterprise Development Group Co. to McKesson.

McKesson isn’t the only pharmaceutical giant facing issues with its syringes. Cardinal Health and Fresenius Medical Care have also had class one recalls — the most serious type of recall — for their syringes in the past several months. According to the recall, the size changes in Cardinal Health Monoject syringes when used with various pumps caused problems such as incorrect dosages, therapy delays and pump malfunctions, including occlusion alarms and feeding delays. In a press release from February, Cardinal Health said its goal is to provide “safe, high-quality products” and it has not received received any reports of patient death due to these syringes, but added “there is a potential risk of serious injury or death.”

The FDA said Fresenius recalled its product due to reports of syringe leakage as well as reports of unknown black material inside the syringe. In a November press release, Fresenius said it sent recall notifications to 1,699 customers about its voluntary removal of its syringe products from the market. 

In its statement to CNBC, the FDA said it believes the supply and manufacturing capability of plastic syringes made in countries other than China, including in the U.S., is sufficient to prevent a shortage. The agency also said it will continue to evaluate problems with syringes made in China.

Categories
Sport

WR Mike Williams key addition for win-now Jets, Aaron Rodgers

  • Rich Cimini, ESPN Staff WriterMar 19, 2024, 08:41 PM ET

    Close

      Rich Cimini is a staff writer who covers the New York Jets and the NFL at ESPN. Rich has covered the Jets for over 30 years, joining ESPN in 2010. Rich also hosts the Flight Deck podcast. He previously was a beat writer for the New York Daily News and is a graduate of Syracuse University. You can follow him via Twitter @RichCimini.

FLORHAM PARK, N.J. — Somewhere in Malibu, California — or wherever he’s hanging out this week — New York Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers is smiling.

His bosses back in New Jersey, in a span of nine days, have bolstered his supporting cast in an all-out, pedal-to-the-metal effort to add a companion to the Super Bowl III trophy that — in Rodgers’ words — is “looking a little lonely” in the team showcase.

The latest addition came Tuesday with the news that former Los Angeles Chargers wide receiver Mike Williams had signed a one-year contract that could be worth up to $15 million.

What to know for the 2024 NFL offseason

• Tracking deals, cuts, trades | Key dates
• Best remaining free agents (ESPN+)
• Grading the biggest moves (ESPN+)
• Every coach hiring | Franchise tags
• NFL draft order | Top draft prospects

Rodgers is 40 years old, so there’s no such thing as building for the future. General manager Joe Douglas, put on alert recently by owner Woody Johnson, is filling holes with big-name players whose free agent markets were depressed because of durability concerns.

That’s how he landed eight-time Pro Bowl left tackle Tyron Smith, 33, who signed a one-year, $6.5 million contract (with another $13.5 million available in incentives) Friday. That’s how he got Williams, 29, who underwent ACL surgery only six months ago and surely has a ton of playing-time incentives in his deal.

The hope is that Williams and Smith can overcome age and injury to be what they have been, teaming with a presumably healthy Rodgers to make last season’s nightmare fade away. The Jets, who got only four plays out of Rodgers before his left Achilles gave out, finished 29th in scoring and 31st in yards last season.

Their offensive plan consisted mainly of a backup quarterback (pick one, anyone) forcing passes to wide receiver Garrett Wilson or throwing checkdowns to running back Breece Hall. They needed another weapon to relieve pressure on Wilson. That led them to Williams, whose size (6-foot-4) and ability to win contested balls should be a nice complement to the speedy and slippery Wilson.

“As far as the receiver room, we’ve got some great young guys and we’ve got some great vets,” Wilson said after the season. “But I think another infusion of someone that brought a different thing to the table that gives the defense something to worry about, it would be beneficial to everyone, not just me.”

The Jets are hoping that Mike Williams can bounce back from an injury that sidelined him for all but three games last season to help their wide receiver room. Bailey Hillesheim/Icon Sportswire

Wilson was being diplomatic. In reality, the receiver room was filled with question marks, none bigger than Allen Lazard, who landed on the bench after signing a four-year, $44 million contract in free agency. Because of that mistake, Douglas had to venture back into the market for Williams.

“If healthy, he’s a starter, but more of a No. 2,” an AFC personnel director said. “It seems like a solid move for the Jets — if he’s healthy.”

Williams missed 18 games over the past two seasons, including the Chargers’ playoff loss in 2022. His numbers were average in 2022 (63 catches, 895 yards and four touchdowns). He hasn’t been an impact player since 2021, when he posted career highs in catches (76) and receiving yards (1,146).

It’s a stretch to think he can recapture that level after three years and surgery, but the Jets don’t need him to be the star of the show. They have Wilson and Hall to handle that. They just need him to be a complementary player, someone Rodgers can count on.

Best of NFL Nation

• Why the Bears traded Justin Fields now
• Browns banking on 2023 core
• Panthers resetting in free agency
• Saquon, Giants weren’t built to last
• Why Packers chose Jacobs over Jones
• Can Jets replace Huff’s sack production?

Based on past performance, it should be a productive union. Since 2018, his second year, Williams leads the NFL with an average of 15.8 yards per reception, based on a minimum of 200 catches. From 2018 to 2022, Rodgers led the league with 6,387 passing yards when targeting vertical routes, according to Next Gen Stats.

With Wilson and Williams on the outside, and with the dual-threat Hall in the backfield, the Jets can attack all areas of the field. The last time they fielded two receivers with résumés that included 1,000-yard seasons was 2016, with Brandon Marshall and Eric Decker. They have a solid tight end in Tyler Conklin, but they could add firepower to that position by drafting someone like Georgia’s Brock Bowers with the 10th overall pick, which ESPN draft analyst Mel Kiper projected them to do in his latest mock draft Tuesday.

Suddenly, Douglas has a lot of flexibility with that pick. By signing Williams and adding Smith, right tackle Morgan Moses and left guard John Simpson, Douglas addressed the most pressing needs on offense. Now he can sit back and take the best player, whether it’s Bowers or another tackle or a receiver if one of the big three prospects slips — Ohio State’s Marvin Harrison Jr., LSU’s Malik Nabers or Washington’s Rome Odunze.

Bottom line: Rodgers’ supporting cast is better than it was a year ago. It’s an older group, with a lot of one-year contracts (and injuries), but there’s only one year that matters for the win-now Jets.

Categories
Science

Earth’s Lengthy-Time period Habitability Depends on Chemical Cycles. How Can We Higher Perceive Them?

We, and all other complex life, require stability to evolve. Planetary conditions needed to be benign and long-lived for creatures like us and our multicellular brethren to appear and to persist. On Earth, chemical cycling provides much of the needed stability.

Chemical cycling between the land, atmosphere, lifeforms, and oceans is enormously complex and difficult to study. Typically, researchers try to isolate one cycle and study it. However, new research is examining Earth’s chemical cycling more holistically to try to understand how the planet has stayed in the ‘sweet spot’ for so long.

Earth has supported complex life for hundreds of millions of years, possibly for more than a billion years. This is extremely rare, as far as we can tell. The vast majority of the exoplanets we’ve discovered are not in their stars’ habitable zones. They have very little chance of hosting any life, let alone complex life.

It’s possible that some planets experience a period of stability for much shorter periods of time than Earth. This may describe Mars. It was warm and wet and could’ve hosted simple life, but the planet lost most of its atmosphere and became uninhabitable. Now it’s cold, dry, and dead.

Earth robustly cycles the chemical elements through different systems and has done so for billions of years. Now, about 4.5 billion years after its formation, life is abundant on our precious planet. Biogeochemical cycles like the carbon cycle, the nitrogen cycle, and the methane cycle have allowed the planet to sustain its habitability.

New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences examines these cycles holistically, hoping to better understand the relationships between them. The research is “Balance and imbalance in biogeochemical cycles reflect the operation of closed, exchange, and open sets.” The lead author is Preston Cosslett Kemeny, a University of Chicago TC Chamberlain postdoctoral fellow.

“Overall, this work provides a systematic conceptual framework
for understanding balance and imbalance in global biogeochemical cycles.”

From “Balance and imbalance in biogeochemical cycles reflect the operation of closed, exchange, and open sets.”

Earth’s carbon cycle plays a dominant role in the climate. As carbon accumulates in the atmosphere, the planet warms. As carbon is sequestered into the mantle, the planet cools. Even though it’s been stable for a long time, research shows that small imbalances can upset the system.

What Kemeny and his co-researchers wanted to do was get back to the basics. They wanted to identify a framework for all the reactions, both large and small, that comprise Earth’s chemical cycles. What’s different in their work is that they didn’t specify how they all worked together, if they worked together, or how much they affected one another.

“Our approach provides a new way to identify the fundamental building blocks of stability in the chemical components of Earth’s climate—the underlying ways in which the climate can be stabilized over geological time due to the movement of elements across the ocean, atmosphere, and rock reservoirs,” said Kemeny.

Earth’s long-lasting habitability created the conditions for complex life like us to appear. That habitability is dependent on the complex interplay of chemistry between the ocean, atmosphere and land. This image, captured from the International Space Station 400km above Earth’s surface, shows our planet’s thin atmosphere. Image Credit: NASA

The researchers describe their effort as ‘agnostic’ and explain that it creates “… a systematic and simplified conceptual framework for understanding the function and evolution of global biogeochemical cycles.” They call it agnostic because it doesn’t specify the relationship between environmental conditions and the strength of biogeochemical processes. “By remaining agnostic to the relationships between environmental conditions and the intensity of biogeochemical processes, we sought to recognize and systematize patterns that underly the stability of major element cycles,” Kemeny explains on his website.

“This is an elegant, simplified way to think about an enormous problem, which organizes a lot of previous research on elemental cycles into packages of chemical reactions that can be balanced and understood,” said University of Chicago Assistant Professor Clara Blättler, senior author of the paper.

The complexity of Earth’s cycles makes them difficult to study. They work on long geological timescales, which puts us at a disadvantage. The planet’s carbon cycle illustrates this.

The movement of carbon plays an important role in regulating the planet’s climate. When carbon dioxide accumulates in the atmosphere, the atmosphere traps more heat, which warms up the oceans. However, carbon also creates a weak acid called carbonic acid that breaks rocks down faster. The carbon eventually finds its way to the ocean floor and becomes sequestered in rock. Carbon can also spend some time as part of living things before being sequestered into rock or fossil fuels. This sequestration of carbon eventually cools the planet but takes millions of years. Carbon is eventually returned to the atmosphere by volcanoes and by the burning of fossil fuels.

The Carbon cycle plays a dominant role in moderating Earth’s climate, but other chemical cycles influence it. Image Credit: U.S. DOE, Biological and Environmental Research Information System.

Trying to understand the carbon cycle is made more difficult by its interaction with other cycles. The Earth’s cycles also aren’t static. They change over time, adding to the complexity. There are also missing pieces from the large puzzle of Earth’s cycles. Researchers are forced to make assumptions to fill in the blanks.

Kemeny devotes much of his time to understanding Earth’s cycles, and he and his colleagues hope that their approach can yield better results. “Models of global element cycles seek to understand how biogeochemical processes and environmental conditions interact to sustain planetary habitability,” Kemeny writes on his website. “However, outcomes from such models often reflect specific interpretations of geochemical archives.”

The researchers think their approach may help overcome the obstacles to understanding Earth’s cycles. They employed a mathematical analysis to develop a framework identifying all of the major and minor cycles that contribute to Earth’s long-term habitability by balancing the carbon cycle.

The result was a new, more holistic way to look at Earth. The climate can be represented by a large set of interconnected chemical equations. These equations must balance over certain time periods to keep the carbon cycle stable and the Earth habitable.

The Sulphur Cycle is just one of Earth’s important cycles. It moves sulphur between rocks, water, and living things. Kemeny and his colleagues are trying to understand all of Earth’s cycles holistically rather than in isolation. Image Credit: By Bantle – Own work, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=20411832

Kemeny highlights one episode in Earth’s climate history to illustrate the point. The Cenozoic era began about 65.5 million years ago and is the era we live in now. The Cenozoic is a long-term cooling trend in Earth’s history, and the period that preceded it was a greenhouse climate. Kemeny and his colleagues say that their holistic approach can open a window into how the climate changed.

“For example, say that you are considering a hypothesis for why the climate changed in the past – such as the major cooling of the last 65 million years,” Kemeny said. “You can take this framework and use it to say: well, if X process increased or decreased, then it should have also caused Y to happen, or would have needed to be balanced by Z, and that you have to account for those outcomes—so with that prediction we can look for evidence for the joint operation of the whole geochemical system.”

Astrobiology and planetary habitability are key topics in space science. With the help of the JWST and other upcoming observatories and telescopes, scientists are getting a look at the atmospheres of distant exoplanets. But it’s a difficult process, made more difficult by our less-than-complete understanding of our own planet’s habitability. Understanding our own planet can help us better understand exoplanets.

But there’s a certain type of joy in understanding Earth for its own sake, and this new holistic approach should grow our understanding.

“We hope it’s a beautiful way to help understand all the chemistries that are involved in making Earth a safe place for life to evolve,” Blättler said.

“Overall, this work provides a systematic conceptual framework for understanding balance and imbalance in global biogeochemical cycles,” the authors conclude.

Like this:

Like Loading…