Categories
Entertainment

Amber Portwood's fiancé Gary Wayt discovered after disappearance

The investigation into the disappearance of Amber PortwoodThe relationship with 's fiancé is over.

Less than a week after Gary Wayt in North Carolina was reported missing, Bryson City police said the 38-year-old “has been found.”

In a June 14 update to their previous missing person report, authorities wrote on Facebook: “No further information is available at this time. The case is closed.”

Before Wayt disappeared, he was last seen at a Bryson City hotel where he and Portwood were staying, according to an incident report obtained by TMZ. Authorities said the “Teen Mom: The Next Chapter” star was the one who reported her fiancé missing.

Wayt was finally spotted on surveillance video in Oklahoma on June 9, more than 900 miles from where he was last seen, officials confirmed to E! News.

“This is a big deal,” Portwood said during a June 11 appearance on a YouTube live show with Elle Bee“His parents, everyone is very worried. I'm worried.”

Categories
Science

Lunar lander detects technosignatures coming from Earth

The search for life is one of the most debated questions in science. The question is: what do you look for? The lunar module Odysseus recently discovered signs of a technologically advanced civilization… on Earth! The lunar module is equipped with an instrument called ROLSES, which has been studying Earth's radio emissions as if it were an exoplanet to see if it can detect signs of life!

Odysseus was launched on February 15. It was Intuitive Machines' lunar module and landed in the Moon's solar polar region seven days later. Since then, it has been collecting valuable data from the region as a prelude to future human exploration. It was part of the Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, built entirely by private companies. Despite the landing mishap that caused Odysseus to tip onto its side, it still performed well.

There were other challenges along the way. The laser-guided navigation system, which was supposed to facilitate landing on the rocky surface, failed. Since Armstrong landed Apollo 11 manually in the last minutes, the ground crew had to conduct the landing using the optical camera system alone. The trip to the moon was not without incident either. One of the antennas of the ROLSES system overheated and came loose from its housing. During landing, an image showed the antenna sticking out.

Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin raise the US flag on the lunar surface 45 years ago on July 20, 1969 during the Apollo 11 mission, the first human moonwalk in history. Image credit: NASA

On board Odysseus is the Radio Wave Observations at the Lunar Surface Photo Electron Sheath, or ROLSES for short, a radio experiment designed to study the properties of the Earth's atmosphere from the lunar surface. It was a unique opportunity to observe Earth in a completely different way and see if our approach to hunting for technologically capable extraterrestrial civilizations is correct.

The instrument was built at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland and included radio antennas and a device called a radio spectrometer. Its purpose was to record a wide range of radio emissions from the “radio-quiet” region of the moon. It turned out to be a small bonus, though, as it allowed the team to record radio waves from Earth for about an hour and a half.

NASA has selected three commercial lunar lander providers to deliver science and technology payloads as part of the Artemis program under the Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS). Each commercial lander will carry NASA-provided payloads that will conduct scientific investigations and demonstrate advanced technologies on the lunar surface, paving the way for NASA astronauts to land on the lunar surface by 2024… The selections are: … • Pittsburgh-based Astrobotic has received $79.5 million and has proposed flying up to 14 payloads to Lacus Mortis, a large crater on the nearside of the Moon, by July 2021… • Houston-based Intuitive Machines has received $77 million. The company has proposed flying up to five payloads to Oceanus Procellarum, a scientifically fascinating dark spot on the moon, by July 2021…• Edison, New Jersey-based Orbit Beyond has received $97 million and proposed flying up to four payloads to Mare Imbrium, a lava plain in one of the moon's craters, by September 2020. …All three lander models were on display at the announcement of the companies selected to provide the first lunar landers for the Artemis program, Friday, May 31, 2019, at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. …Read more: https://go.nasa.gov/2Ki2mJo..Image credit: NASA/Goddard/Rebecca Roth

We have known for some time that all signals from cell phones and TV/radio stations slowly drift out into space (and have now reached a distance of just over 100 light years). All of these emissions are potentially detectable, but the farther away you are from Earth, the weaker the signal. Within these signals, the team was able to detect signs of an intelligent, technological civilization. Attention will now of course turn to detecting the same signals from exoplanets, but perhaps not from ROLSES; something bigger is needed.

Source: In a new experiment, scientists record Earth's radio waves from the moon

Like this:

How Is loading…

Categories
Health

9 shares that may profit from Fed price cuts

Stanley Black & Decker drills are displayed for sale at a Home Depot store in Colma, California.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg |

The S&P500 And Nasdaq continued their record rallies this week after lower-than-expected consumer inflation data came in Wednesday morning. While Fed rate cuts would likely benefit the overall stock market, several names in the CNBC Investing Club portfolio – from real estate stocks to autos to biotech – could really see a boost.

Categories
Sport

Euro 2024 Energy Rankings: France high; Germany under England

Jun 13, 2024, 04:00 AM ET

Euro 2024 kicks off Friday when 24 teams will have the chance to get their hands on the iconic trophy. But how likely is each one to win the tournament?

The question seems simple enough, but it mixes in all manner of elements: Star quality, squad depth, national confidence, weaknesses, tactical approaches, injuries and — perhaps most importantly for those below the top eight — bracketology, too. Some nations have landed in really sweet spots with regard to a potential pathway into the round of 16 (or beyond).

Who are the favourites? Who’s got no chance? We’ve ranked all 24 teams in Germany this summer. Let’s dive in.

Kylian Mbappe’s France are one of the favorites going into Euro 2024. FRANCK FIFE/AFP via Getty Images

This will be Albania’s second European Championship, having qualified once before in 2016. They faced France in the opener that year and nearly pulled off an almighty shock, holding the hosts until the 90th minute before Antoine Griezmann broke the deadlock.

They’ll need some more of that opening night spoiler energy if they’re to make any waves at Euro 2024, as they’ve landed in a group with three heavyweights: Spain, Italy and Croatia. Under manager Sylvinho, Albania have tried to move toward a more attacking style, but they’ll probably have to revert to the more-defensive approach of old given the calibre of their opponents. They have some experienced defenders, and a real talent in midfield in Kristjan Asllani of Internazionale, but this group looks borderline impossible to navigate for them.

Romania are an intriguing, spritely team and, despite the fact they haven’t won a game at a European Championship or World Cup since 2000, they will fancy getting something from a Group E containing Belgium, Slovakia and Ukraine.

But they face two serious issues. First, a severe quality deficit compared to the rest of the finalists, as very few of their players play in a top league. Second, a few of their key performers have struggled for minutes at club level in 2024, suggesting a lack of sharpness. Romania will be free to play a counter-attacking style and try to catch their opponents on the hop, but there’s no realistic hope of them stringing together a fairy-tale run deep into the competition.

On paper, Georgia have all the pieces to enchant us with a fairy-tale run: First-ever appearance at the finals? Check. Good goalkeeper (Giorgi Mamardashvili)? Check. Rigid five-man back line? Check. A true difference-maker in attack (Khvicha Kvaratskhelia)? Check. And some fine talent sprinkled across the midfield to boot.

This team will defend as if their lives depend on it, then give the ball to Napoli winger Kvaratskhelia who will dribble, dribble and dribble some more — no one completed more dribbles than him (44) during qualifying. It’s a plan that depends on Kvaratskhelia’s execution in the final third, not unlike Wales’ Euro 2016 effort with Gareth Bale. It would be magical if Georgia could pull this off, but the reality is that it will be tough for them to repeat over and over, especially in a group containing Czechia, Portugal and Turkey.

Slovenia are one of the most traditional-looking teams heading to the tournament from a tactical perspective, playing a stout 4-4-2 formation that relies on difference-makers at both ends of the pitch.

Up front, they have RB Leipzig striker Benjamin Sesko, who this week shunned the interest of multiple top clubs in order to stay at the Bundesliga outfit and continue honing his craft. The 6-foot-5 frontman is pretty much the leading light of this team, adding a dash of quality to an otherwise workmanlike outfit, ready and willing to make tackles and launch counters. Goalkeeper Jan Oblak of Atlético Madrid is a star between the sticks and should be kept busy, too.

Slovenia scored more and conceded fewer than Denmark in qualifying but only took a single point in fixtures between them, and they will meet them again in Group C. Serbia are even tougher opponents and England one step further, meaning their overall chances look slim.

Czechia really are anyone’s guess. Ivan Hasek was only appointed as coach in April after Jaroslav Silhavy’s decision to quit at the end of qualifying in November.

Hasek, who captained the side in the 1980s and ’90s, before coaching them in 2009, leads them into the tournament now, but he had just two tune-ups to put his stamp on the team before facing Portugal in the group opener.

That makes them almost impossible to rank. All we can do is measure their squad quality against their group opponents, and a conservative assessment places them below Portugal and Turkey, but above Georgia. In ranking them 20th, we’re noting their top-level quality (Patrik Schick, Adam Hlozek, Tomás Soucek, Vladimír Coufal) but questioning their readiness for a tournament run.

Can Robert Lewandowski lift Poland past the group stage? Foto Olimpik/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Given their undoubted star quality in certain positions, you may be shocked to find Poland ranked so low, but even top European footballers such as Robert Lewandowski, Piotr Zielinski and Wojciech Szczesny have failed to bring this national team to life over the years. They were shocking to watch during the 2022 World Cup group stage and no better during qualifying for Euro 2024, having to settle for the playoffs despite being in a group with Albania, Czechia, Moldova and Faroe Islands.

Lewandowski is the difference-maker so many nations crave, but his record of six goals in 18 Euros/World Cup games is poor. Having only scored three in eight qualifiers, it’s hard to believe the 35-year-old striker’s fortunes will change this summer — especially considering he’s an injury concern and could miss one or two group games. His natural replacement, Arkadiusz Milik, is injured too. As a result, it’s unlikely Poland will do much against Austria, Netherlands and France in Group D.

The local sentiment around this Serbia team is one of genuine fear and embarrassment, which is a huge shame given this is a stage they’ve been longing to return to for 14 years. Qualifying performances were poor — manager Dragan Stojkovic admits as much — and while things did perk up a little with a 3-0 friendly win over Sweden this month, it’s tough to take too much from that.

There are huge concerns around a defence that conceded eight goals in three games at the 2022 World Cup. That unit looks no better and is now about to face England’s Harry Kane, Denmark’s Rasmus Højlund and Slovenia’s Sesko, which is a truly torrid run of opposing strikers. Serbia obviously have quality, but the balance of the team is off and there’s very little confidence in them overall.

Slovakia are among a handful of teams hopeful of playing at least four games in Germany this summer. Qualification from Group E is achievable and would mean everything to them. They’ll lean on a mean defence in their attempt to do it, with Paris Saint-Germain’s Milan Skriniar, FC Copenhagen’s Denis Vavro and Feyenoord’s Dávid Hancko an underrated, stout group. Up front, Boavista striker Róbert Bozeník is a threat, while midfielder Stanislav Lobotka is a quality signal controller for both Napoli and his nation.

Is that enough to pip Romania and then tussle with Ukraine for qualification to the knockout rounds? Almost certainly, and then anything else is a bonus.

Hungary enter Euro 2024 as one of the most settled teams, which certainly counts for something — after all, the winners of the last edition, Italy, were similarly set and composed. That’s not to say the team will be lifting the trophy on July 14, but in a group containing Scotland and Switzerland (as well as hosts Germany), they’ll be eyeing qualification.

Manager Marco Rossi will use a stern, experienced, physical back three; flying wing-backs who cover loads of ground; and a familiar midfield partnership to break up play. Then he’ll give Liverpool’s Dominik Szoboszlai and SC Freiburg’s Roland Sallai the freedom to roam, get on the ball and make the difference.

It could well be enough to carry them into the knockouts, which would be a tremendous showing.

Will Scott McTominay be able to repeat his goal-scoring form for his country? (Photo by Ash Donelon/Manchester United via Getty Images)

Scotland open the tournament against hosts Germany on Friday and will look to cause a stir. Given how stubborn a team they have proven to be under manager Steve Clarke, it’s not out of the question that something special happens. Beyond that, they’ll fancy themselves to get a win against one of Switzerland or Hungary, drawing upon a brilliant goal-scoring midfield powered by John McGinn and Scott McTominay.

A knockout berth is well within reach of the Scots — something they have never achieved in their history. Anything beyond that might seem fanciful, but they won’t care if they secure it.

Many have been surprised that manager Murat Yakin remains in charge of Switzerland; the case for sacking him was there to be made after they won just four of 10 qualifying games against Romania, Israel, Belarus, Kosovo and Andorra. But they’ve pressed on with him regardless, hoping the natural order will restore itself: Switzerland have made the knockout rounds in every tournament they’ve entered since 2014 and have landed in a workable Group A that includes Hungary and Scotland.

In Granit Xhaka, Manuel Akanji and Yann Sommer they have some of the best players heading to Euro 2024, but the question is whether Yakin can patch up the side’s fragile confidence levels and get them going again.

After the fiasco of Euro 2020 — in which Turkey were tipped to go far but went on to lose all three group games and concede eight goals in the process — it’s natural to treat this team with caution three years on. But it’s undeniably an exciting crop of players, headlined by Hakan Çalhanoglu of Inter Milan and spruced up by several attacking starlets including Real Madrid’s Arda Güler.

Turkey finished top of a qualifying group that included Croatia and Wales, and they’re threatening to play some pretty vivacious attacking football. No one is predicting much this time around, but they should expect to finish second in Group F and set up a thrilling round-of-16 tie with France.

Ukraine squeezed into Euro 2024 via the playoffs, so you might be surprised to see them ranked above 12 other nations, many of whom qualified automatically. There’s a good reason for this, though, and it’s based on bracketology.

Simply put, Ukraine have landed in a group ripe for qualifying: Belgium, Slovakia and Romania. Second place is there for the taking, and that could set up a round-of-16 game against Austria or Netherlands.

Admittedly, Ukraine’s qualifying results (P8, W4, D2, L2) don’t exactly inspire confidence, but their unique circumstances must be considered, and playing in neutral venues due to the ongoing war with Russia is never going to extract your best form. This is a good squad that has a desire to win and, in Oleksandr Zinchenko, Mykhailo Mudryk and Artem Dovbyk, has a series of potential difference-makers.

Will it be a repeat of Euro 2020, where an emotional roller coaster like no other (after Christian Eriksen suffered a cardiac arrest on the pitch in the opening game) saw Denmark reach the semifinals? Or a repeat of the 2022 World Cup where they fell flat? It is difficult to say.

Much of the team has remained the same over the past four years, meaning that many of the players are 30-plus years of age and unable to replicate the intense style they thrilled us with in 2021. That threatens to make them just a little too old and slow to be a significant threat in Germany, but there’s always something to be said for experience at a major finals.

Denmark are expected to qualify from the group, probably in second place behind England, but in doing so they’ll set themselves up for a tough run of opponents — possibly starting with Germany in the round of 16. That keeps them outside of the top 10 in this ranking.

David Alaba could be a big miss for Austria Christian Hofer/Getty Images

It’s rare that you find perfect managerial fits for nations, but Ralf Rangnick and Austria feel like just that. Thanks to his Red Bull background he has played a part in so many of the players’ careers he now directly manages, so it feels right he’s the one who has been tasked with leading them into the European Championship.

Rangnick will have them pressing harder than any other team at Euro 2024, utilising a midfield full of energy to create turnovers and then share the goals out. That makes Austria’s lack of a proven scoring No. 9 striker less of an issue but perhaps won’t fully mitigate the crucial loss of their best player, Real Madrid defender David Alaba, to injury.

Landing in a group with France and the Netherlands is tough, but they have it in them to pip Poland to third and perhaps even beat the Dutch to second. If they do finish second, they’d land a very friendly round-of-16 tie (likely Slovakia or Ukraine), meaning that there could be a surprisingly clear path opening up for this team to have a run. Austria are definitely one to keep a close eye on.

Be it over fitness or form, the Netherlands seem to have question marks all over the pitch as they head into this tournament. How sharp will talisman Memphis Depay be? How will the left flank look? Can RB Leipzig midfielder Xavi Simons replicate his club form for his country? And on the eve of the tournament, an absolute bombshell dropped: Central midfielder Frenkie de Jong is injured and can’t participate. How will they cope?

That’s a lot of questions to have hanging over your head, which probably explains the local pessimism. But this is a team that boasts Virgil van Dijk, Denzel Dumfries and Cody Gakpo — that’s true star quality — and if Memphis can find fitness, it will start to look pretty dangerous once again. The Netherlands’ easiest fixture (Poland) comes first, perhaps giving them a little bit of time to figure things out.

Despite Croatia’s recent international success, the European Championship remains a bit of a bleak spot for them, and they’ve never even won a knockout game in four attempts. Will 2024 be fifth time lucky?

Some would argue they’re caught between two generations; others could say they boast a nice blend of youth and experience. It’s up to manager Zlatko Dalic to mix in the fresh faces responsibly and, perhaps, manage the minutes of the old guard. Luka Modric will lead them out, aged 38, but he is unlikely to last the full 90 minutes, as he did so only five times for Real Madrid in 2023-24.

There isn’t much room for error — not with Spain and Italy in the same group — and there are questions over whether this team can genuinely run such an intense seven-game gauntlet to the finish.

Italy and Croatia were both in the running for seventh but, in the end, we gave a respectful nod to the defending champions — although they failed to qualify for the 2022 World Cup, were forced into a managerial change last year and have suffered worse than anyone with regard to injuries, with the defensive line hit particularly hard.

That said, they are unbeaten this calendar year. In Gianluca Scamacca they have a striker in fine form, while the midfield unit led by Nicolò Barella (when fit) is both tremendously energetic and packed with quality. Italy have the strength to beat anyone on their day, but they just don’t feel as overwhelmingly strong as the nations ranked above them.

Belgium are one of the toughest nations to gauge (and therefore rank), as while some pre-tournament excitement has been building around them, it’s not necessarily coming from their supporters. Perhaps that’s because anyone who looks at a team sheet and sees the names Kevin De Bruyne, Romelu Lukaku and Jérémy Doku can’t help but get excited. And remember that Lukaku scored 14 goals in qualifying, breaking the record.

Unfortunately for Belgium, there’s problems at the other end of the pitch. Perhaps that’s gone under the radar a little as they only conceded four during qualifying, but things aren’t as rosy as they might seem. First off, you don’t get to play Azerbaijan and Estonia at the Euros — the opposition is a lot tougher than that. Second, Thibaut Courtois, arguably the world’s best goalkeeper, is fit again after spending most of the season recovering from injury for Real Madrid but has been left at home after a public spat with Belgium’s manager, Domenico Tedesco. Third, the defence is better than it was at the World Cup in 2022, but it is still creaky and wants to lean on veterans Jan Vertonghen and Axel Witsel.

When Belgium face the best, will they stand up defensively or collapse? Will they simply outscore their opponents? Their ceiling is unclear, but they do promise to be tons of fun.

play

2:24

Can Spain’s new-look squad compete at Euro 2024?

Sam Marsden assesses Spain’s provisional squad for Euro 2024.

Spain won three straight international honours between 2008 and 2012, but they have largely disappointed since then and have left us asking the same question over and over: Can you make your possession count?

The answer in 2018, 2021 and 2022 was no. They played better football than Russia, Italy and Morocco, respectively, but lost to each on penalties. But then in 2023, they won the UEFA Nations League by beating Croatia, which reacquainted them with success and could give them an edge this summer.

In measuring Spain against the rest of the top five in this ranking, there’s not an awful lot in it, but they end up fifth because they’re in the toughest group alongside Italy and Croatia. Of all the teams in this top tier, there’s probably the most scope for things to go wrong early on.

Is it all coming together for Germany, just in time? They had a wretched 2023, losing five of nine friendlies and winning two, but since the turn of the year the mood has perked up significantly — particularly after beating France and Netherlands in quick succession in March.

The emotional power of Toni Kroos’ final goodbye before he retires could be enough to give them the extra edge. Add that to the home-crowd advantage; the talent of the likes of Ilkay Gündogan, Jamal Musiala and Florian Wirtz; and the fact that, for the most part, problematic positions of left-back and striker have sorted themselves out, and rivals will be wary.

Sentiment among the fans remains somewhat reserved — likely due to the fact their past three tournament performances have been disastrous — but given what’s happened since March, this is a team that we need to take seriously.

play

1:19

Is it time for England to deliver at a major tournament?

Gareth Southgate speaks to James Olley ahead of England’s opening game against Serbia at Euro 2024.

As has often been the case over the past three decades, England’s big question is not one of quality, it’s one of mentality. Harry Kane, Jude Bellingham and Phil Foden are world-class attackers who will undoubtedly lead the Three Lions safely through the group stage, but when the knockout rounds hit and it’s time to face up against a team like France, can they get it done? And will a defence short of top names hold up?

England’s unbeaten qualifying campaign proves they can handle anyone from Italy to Malta, from a quality perspective. What we don’t know, though, is whether the last few years of England’s players winning Champions League titles (with Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester City) has changed the mentality of this team in a way that will allow them to finally overcome a true giant.

This, plus the upheaval and uncertainty in the back line, holds them back when compared to a couple of other nations.

Portugal made light work of their qualifying campaign, winning 10 games out of 10, scoring 36 goals and conceding two. It should be noted, though, that it was a really weak group; for context, the team that finished second, Slovakia, is ranked 17th in this piece.

Still, you look at the squad and can’t help but be impressed: Bruno Fernandes, Cristiano Ronaldo, Bernardo Silva, Rúben Dias and João Cancelo all started eight or more qualifying games and remain at the heart of this team, then a series of other extremely talented players fill in the gaps as manager Roberto Martínez sees fit.

Portugal boast loads of goals, creativity and some great defenders, while physicality runs through the spine of the team. Plus, there’s added tactical flexibility nowadays. Those are all the ingredients you need to win a tournament, and the hype they are generating is well justified.

But for a handful of adjustments, France head into Euro 2024 looking like the same force that came within a penalty kick of winning the 2022 World Cup. They’re still tactically disciplined, physical, stacked with quality and boasting one of the world’s best forwards in Kylian Mbappé. With that in mind, they’re still favourites in our eyes.

Didier Deschamps’ men will need to shake off the disappointment of a quarterfinal exit at Euro 2020, but you get the impression that, with Olivier Giroud back in and Karim Benzema back out, this team will hum a more familiar tune. That tune — a cautious one that doesn’t always excite — isn’t universally popular, but it has proven to be devastatingly effective.

France are not without their injuries and issues — veterans Hugo Lloris and Raphaël Varane have departed the scene, while Lucas Hernández is injured — but Les Bleus’ incredible depth means they still look formidable, and their tournament record since 2016 marks them out as the team to beat.

Categories
Entertainment

Megan Thee Stallion reacts to Charlamagne Tha God's remark

Megan Thee Stallion has apparently reacted to Charlamagne, the God's comment that she is not an “arena artist”.

RELATED: Oops! Charlamagne Tha God Goes Viral After Saying THIS About Megan Thee Stallion (WATCH)

This is how Megan Thee Stallion apparently reacted to the words of Charlamagne Tha God

On Wednesday, June 12, Megan took to Instagram to share a carousel of photos from her “Hot Girl Summer” tour so far. In addition, the rapper shared a long message to her hot fans.

“Hotties as we prepare for my FIRST ALBUM UNDER HOTGIRL PRODUCTIONS coming out 6/28 I wanted to share some of my favorite things that have happened on tour SO FAR 🫶🏽,” she wrote, before including numbered bullet points. “1. I appreciate and love how my dancers (the hot girls) put in the effort every show! I know our bodies hurt but they never complain and still come out and have a great time lol! Love y'all 2. I love the bond that has been built between me and @glorillapimp over the past few weeks! You are my sister 4L you and cola are never getting rid of me 🥹3. @frenchie4oe HAS ALL THE KIDS! My son is a DADDY 😭 4. Hotties you motivate and make me so happy you don't even know it! I look out into the crowd, see your signs and burst out laughing 😂, keep sending signs 😂 5. THE FLOWERS 🥹 I LOVE THE FLOWERS! These hot girls make me feel like I have the biggest family in the world and I'm grateful 💙…“

RELATED: Megan Thee Stallion Gets Emotional During Performance at 'Hot Girl Summer' Tour Stop in Tampa (WATCH)

For her sixth point, Megan explained that she was going to “pop” her song “for a second.” The rapper then addressed those who “questioned” whether she was “an arena artist.”

“6. I'm gonna shut up for a minute lol but people are wondering if I'm an arena artist,” she wrote. “… and I mean 🤷🏽‍♀️ hihihi”

The hot boss finally concluded her long message with: “7. I have more people to thank and more moments to create, but I LOVE EVERYONE who has made this tour great so far! Thank you”

This is what Charlamagne said before

As The Shade Room previously reported, “Breakfast Club” co-host Charlamagne Tha God shared his initial thoughts about Meg not being an “arena artist” in May. At the time, tickets for Meg’s “Hot Girl Summer” tour had just gone on sale, and some reports claimed tickets were selling for $24.

Furthermore, Charla stated that he considered Meg more of a “theater artist” than an arena performer.

“If she's performing in arenas, she shouldn't be performing in arenas. She's not an arena performer. Compliments to Megan Thee Stallion, but she's not an arena performer, maybe a theater performer. Arenas are a lot,” he explained during the live broadcast of the show.

Watch the clip below.

The host of “The Breakfast Club” retracted his statement

However, a day after Charla made his initial statements, he appeared to walk them back. As The Shade Room previously reported, the radio host explained on a follow-up episode of the show that Megan's ticket sales seemed to confirm that she was an arena artist.

“I asked the question yesterday: Is Megan Thee Stallion an arena artist? We clearly got our answer,” he said. “Jess just said she sold out 13 arena shows, and I think I read over 240,000 tickets in North America and Europe. So yes, if you sell out arenas, you are an arena artist.”

RELATED: Oh, Okay! Charlamagne Tha God Backtracks on Comments About Megan Thee Stallion's Hot Girl Summer Tour
Categories
Technology

Hamas-linked hackers accused of cyber espionage in Palestine

Hamas-affiliated hackers were involved in five cyberespionage campaigns targeting Palestine and Egypt.

The proof was provided in a new investigation by Slovakian cybersecurity company ESET. The company's analysts discovered five campaigns that distributed Trojan-infected apps to Android users. The attacks focus on spying on user data in Palestine and Egypt.

The campaigns use multi-stage Android spyware that ESET calls “AridSpy.”

To spread the spyware, the hackers used special websites posing as genuine apps. In Palestine, they mainly used a malicious app for the Palestinian civil registry.

“To gain initial access to the device, threat actors try to convince their potential victim to install a fake but functional app,” said Lukáš Štefanko, the ESET researcher who discovered AridSpy.

TNW Conference, June 20-21 – 85% of tickets SOLD OUT

Take advantage of all the networking opportunities: roundtables, masterclasses, tech tours, 1:1 conversations… Last chance to book before there are none left!

“Once the target clicks the site's download button, myScript.js, hosted on the same server, is executed to generate the correct download path for the malicious file.”

ESET attributed the campaigns – with “medium confidence” – to the notorious Arid Viper APT group.

Who is Ariadne Viper?

Arid Viper is also known as APT-C-23, Desert Falcons or Two-tailed Scorpion. Active since at least 2013, the cyberespionage group is notorious for targeting countries in the Middle East. It is also known for delivering a huge arsenal of malware for Android, iOS and Windows platforms.

Cybersecurity vendors have already linked the group to Hamas. It primarily targets facilities in Israel and Palestine, but its influence extends beyond those borders, suggesting a broader geopolitical agenda, analysts say.

However, ESET's new investigation does not denounce any political connection. Instead, the company focuses on cyber espionage techniques.

These techniques allow hackers to spy on messaging apps and extract content from devices. ESET said their campaigns began in 2022. Three of them are still active today.

Categories
Science

Wie viel Erwärmung könnte durch Netto-Null bis 2050 verhindert werden? – Watts Up With That?

Von Christopher Monckton aus Brenchley

Vor einiger Zeit schickte ich Professor Richard Lindzen eine Schätzung, wie viel Erwärmung ein linearer Fortschritt hin zu Netto-Null-Emissionen aller Nationen der Erde bewirken würde. Er war fasziniert. Nun hat er – mit dem herausragenden Team der Professoren Happer und van Wiijngaarden – ein kurzes Papier verfasst, das jetzt von unseren Freunden bei der CO2 Coalition veröffentlicht wurde und eine wissenschaftliche Antwort auf diese Frage bietet:

Net Zero Averted Temperature Increase

Als ich von der neuen Studie erfuhr, war ich zufällig gerade dabei, einem Artikel meines eigenen Teams zum gleichen Thema den letzten Schliff zu geben. Unser Artikel soll in einer Wirtschaftszeitschrift veröffentlicht werden, wo er, wie alle Artikel, die eine ernsthafte und wissenschaftlich glaubwürdige Herausforderung der offiziellen Katastrophengeschichte darstellen, wahrscheinlich rundweg abgelehnt wird – nicht weil er falsch ist, sondern weil er richtig ist.

In diesem Artikel werden kurz die beiden Methoden zur Beantwortung der Frage „Wie viel Erwärmung würde eine Netto-Null-Erwärmung bis 2050 verhindern?“ beschrieben.

Beide Ansätze gehen von der Annahme aus, dass alle Nationen (nicht nur der Westen, auf den sich die internationalen Klimaabkommen gezielt richten) gemeinsam linear von ihren aktuellen Emissionen zu einem Netto-Null-Ziel vorrücken und dieses bis 2050 erreichen.

Hier ist zunächst die Zusammenfassung des Aufsatzes der Professoren:

Netto-Null-Temperaturanstieg vermieden

Anhand rückkopplungsfreier Schätzungen der Erwärmung durch erhöhten Kohlendioxidgehalt (CO2) in der Atmosphäre und der beobachteten Anstiegsraten schätzen wir, dass, wenn die Vereinigten Staaten (USA) die Netto-CO2-Emissionen bis zum Jahr 2050 eliminieren würden, dies eine Erwärmung von 0,0084 °C (0,015 °F) verhindern würde, was unterhalb unserer Fähigkeit liegt, genau zu messen. Wenn die ganze Welt bis zum Jahr 2050 Netto-Null-CO2-Emissionen erzwingen würde, könnte nur eine Erwärmung von 0,070 °C (0,13 °F) verhindert werden. Selbst wenn man davon ausgeht, dass die Erwärmung aufgrund positiver Rückkopplungen um den Faktor 4 größer ist, wie vom Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) behauptet, wäre die durch eine Netto-Null-Politik der USA verhinderte Erwärmung immer noch sehr gering, 0,034 °C (0,061 °F). Bei weltweiten Netto-Null-Emissionen bis 2050 und der 4-mal größeren IPCC-Klimasensitivität würde die verhinderte Erwärmung 0,28 °C (0,50 °F) betragen.

Die Professoren gehen zunächst davon aus, dass die direkte Erwärmung durch einen menschengemachten Antrieb, der einer Verdoppelung des CO2-Gehalts in der Luft gegenüber 1850 entspricht, vor Berücksichtigung jeglicher Rückkopplungsreaktionen etwa 0,75 °C betragen wird, während die endgültige Erwärmung im mittleren Bereich des IPCC nach Berücksichtigung der Rückkopplungsreaktionen viermal höher ausfällt, nämlich 3 °C.

Die Professoren gehen von einer heutigen CO2-Konzentration von 427 ppmv aus, die bei den aktuellen Trends bis 2050, dem offiziellen Zieldatum für Netto-Null, um 64 ppmv auf 491 ppmv steigen würde. Da der CO2-Zwang eine annähernd logarithmische Funktion der Konzentration ist, würde die direkte Erwärmung von heute bis 2050 bei unverändertem Klima 1 °C x log2(491 / 427) oder etwa 0,15 °C betragen.

Sie schätzen dann, dass ein Achtel des Konzentrationsanstiegs von 64 ppmv von jetzt an bis 2050 – also 8 ppmv –, von denen etwa die Hälfte, also 4 ppmv, eingedämmt werden könnte, wenn allein die USA bis 2050 eine Netto-Null-Emissionskonzentration erreichen würden, wodurch die ansonsten prognostizierte CO2-Konzentration von 491 ppmv im Jahr 2050 auf 487 ppmv gesenkt würde.

Würde der Rest der Welt mit seinen Emissionen so weitermachen wie bisher, würde das wirtschaftliche Opfer, das die USA allein durch das Erreichen eines Netto-Null-Ziels bringen würden, die Erwärmung von 0,15 °C bis 2050 nur um 0,01 bis 0,14 °C reduzieren. Selbst wenn man wie das IPCC davon ausginge, dass die Rückkopplungsreaktion die direkte Erwärmung von 0,75 °C durch die Verdoppelung des CO2-Ausstoßes verdrei- oder vervierfachen würde, würde ein Netto-Null-Ziel in den USA die globale Temperatur bis 2050 lediglich um 1/30 °C senken, während ein globales Netto-Null-Ziel sie um kaum mehr als 1/4 °C reduzieren würde.

Unser eigener Ansatz ist sogar noch einfacher als der der Professoren. Hier ist zunächst unsere Zusammenfassung –

Hat fachübergreifendes Unverständnis die Modelle zur ökonomischen Bewertung verfälscht?

Integrierte Bewertungsmodelle, die die wirtschaftlichen Auswirkungen einer Abschwächung der globalen Erwärmung untersuchen, sind ihrem Wesen nach interdisziplinär. Sie erfordern mindestens Kenntnisse in optischer Physik (um den Einfluss anthropogener Einflüsse auf das Klima zu untersuchen); Klimasensitivität (die Frage „Wie stark ist die Erwärmung?“); Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie (um Datenunsicherheiten abzuschätzen); Klimaschutzökonomie (für Kosten-Nutzen-Analysen); Geologie (reichen spezielle Mineralressourcen für eine globale Netto-Null-Energieinfrastruktur aus?); Ingenieurwissenschaften (Kontrolltheorie, Wind- und Solarsysteme und Elektrofahrzeuge); und Geopolitik (Klimaabkommen zielen auf den Westen ab, dessen Energiepreise daher um ein Vielfaches höher sind als die im Osten, wo die Emissionen schnell steigen). Hier wird gezeigt, dass die Klimasensitivität um das Doppelte überbewertet wird; dass trotz Billionen, die seit 1990 für die Verringerung des CO2-Ausstoßes ausgegeben wurden, der Aufwärtstrend beim CO2-Ausstoß linear bleibt; dass selbst wenn alle Nationen bis 2050 Netto-Null erreichen würden, die Erwärmung bis dahin nur um 0,1 bis 0,2 Grad Celsius gemindert wäre; dass die Kosten 2 Billiarden Dollar betragen würden; dass jede ausgegebene Milliarde Dollar die Erwärmung bis 2050 um ein Zwanzigmillionstel Grad Celsius verringern würde; dass in den meisten westlichen Stromnetzen die installierte Nennkapazität an Wind- und Solarenergie den durchschnittlichen Stundenbedarf übersteigt; dass weitere Installationen viel kosten würden, aber keine Verringerung bewirken würden; dass die Masse der Batterien für Elektrofahrzeuge den Energieverbrauch pro Kilometer um 25 bis 100 Prozent erhöht; dass nicht genug Technometalle vorhanden sind, um auch nur eine 15-jährige Generation einer Netto-Null-Infrastruktur aufrechtzuerhalten; und dass sich der Westen in einen strategischen Nachteil bei den Handelsbedingungen bringt, wenn er sich auf integrierte Bewertungsmodelle verlässt, die durch interdisziplinäre Unterschiede so verzerrt sind, dass sie derart leicht zu ermittelnde Tatsachen wie diese nicht widerspiegeln.

Unsere Ergebnisse stimmen im Großen und Ganzen mit denen der Professoren überein, obwohl wir einen noch einfacheren Ansatz wählen. Zunächst nehmen wir an, dass die direkte Erwärmung durch die Verdoppelung des CO2-Gehalts 1 K beträgt, also den Durchschnitt von vier veröffentlichten Ergebnissen. Wir kommen in Übereinstimmung mit den Professoren zu dem Schluss, dass die Erwärmung bis 2050 nur um 0,1 bis 0,2 °C verringert werden könnte, selbst wenn die ganze Welt bis dahin linear von den aktuellen Emissionen auf Netto-Null übergehen würde.

Der Beitrag der USA allein läge also bei 1/40 bis 1/80 °C. Im gesamten Westen würde die Treibhausgasemissionen sogar nur um 1/30 °C sinken, während Großbritannien allein bis 2050 lediglich um 1/1000 °C sinken würde, selbst wenn es bis 2050 eine Netto-Null-Emissionsminderung erreichen würde, was jedoch nicht der Fall sein wird.

Schritt 1: Der Trend des anthropogenen Treibhausgas-Einflusses

Unsere Methode beginnt mit dieser verheerenden Grafik des jährlichen Treibhausgasindex der NOAA. Wir beginnen hier, weil unsere Analyse im Gegensatz zur Analyse der Professoren alle anthropogenen Treibhausgaseinwirkungen berücksichtigt, nicht nur die von CO2:

All die Billionen, die – fast nur im Westen – für die Emissionsminderung ausgegeben wurden, hatten keinerlei erkennbare Wirkung auf die nahezu perfekt lineare Wachstumsrate der anthropogenen Treibhausgase im letzten Dritteljahrhundert seit dem ersten Bericht des IPCC im Jahr 1990.

Beachten Sie nebenbei, dass der Anstieg der Methankonzentration minimal war, wodurch Kuhfürze als legitimer Vorwand für die von der Linken beabsichtigte Zerstörung einer weiteren westlichen Industrie – dieses Mal der Rindfleisch- und Milchindustrie – gänzlich hinfällig werden.

Schritt 2: Der erwartete Anstieg des anthropogenen Einflusses, 2023-2049

Selbst wenn die globale Erwärmung vollständig menschengemacht ist (was nicht unbedingt der Fall sein muss), kann man davon ausgehen, dass sich der nahezu lineare Aufwärtstrend der letzten drei Jahrzehnte bei der CO2-äquivalenten Strahlungsantriebskraft um 1 W/m2 (NOAA a. a. O.) fortsetzt, wenn alles wie bisher weitergeht. 1/30 W m–2 Jahr–1 in den nächsten drei Jahrzehnten. Wenn also alle Nationen gemeinsam schrittweise in Richtung Netto-Null-Emissionen bis 2050 gehen würden, würde die Hälfte der nächsten 0,9 W m–2 Strahlungsantrieb, oder 0,45 W m–2könnte theoretisch gemindert werden.

Schritt 3: Von der Abschwächung der Erwärmung zur Abschwächung der mittelfristigen Erwärmung

Der IPCC (2021, S. 7-7) gibt die effektive Strahlungsantriebskraft in Höhe des doppelten CO2-Äquivalents im mittleren Bereich mit 3,93 W m–2 an. Nijsse (2020) gibt die daraus resultierende Empfindlichkeit gegenüber dem doppelten CO2-Äquivalent im 21. Jahrhundert mit 1,68 K an. Die Erwärmung pro Antriebseinheit beträgt also 1,68 / 3,93, oder 0,43 KW–1 m2so dass die globale Netto-Null-Emissionen um 0,45 x 0,43 sinken würden, oder gerade 1/5 K.

Die folgende detailliertere Bewertung wird zeigen, dass diese Schätzung erster Ordnung optimistisch ist.

Schritt 4: Die globale Erwärmungsrate ist nur halb so hoch wie im mittleren Bereich prognostiziert.

Als die internationale Gemeinschaft der Klimaforscher ihre erste gemeinsame Vorhersage über die Geschwindigkeit der globalen Erwärmung veröffentlichte (IPCC, 1990), wurden vier Emissionsszenarien A–D präsentiert. Szenario A stellte einen „Business as usual“-Zustand dar.

Das im Szenario B prognostizierte Wachstum des anthropogenen Emissionseintrags zwischen 1990 und 2025 (ebenda, S. 56, Abb. 2.4B) entsprach nahezu dem Wachstum, das bei einer Festsetzung der jährlichen Emissionen auf dem Niveau von 1990 beobachtet wurde (ebenda, S. 338, Abb. A.15).

Allerdings sind die jährlichen Emissionen seit 1990 nahezu linear um mehr als 75 % gestiegen, von 32,5 Gte CO2e im Jahr 1990 auf 57,2 Gte CO2e im Jahr 2022 (UNEP 2023).

Das Ergebnis folgt also dem Szenario A, wonach die globale mittlere Oberflächentemperatur im 21. Jahrhundert um 0,3 [0.2 to 0.5] C Dekade–1 oder 3 [2 to 5] C. Jahrhundert–1 oder 3 [2 to 5] C Gleichgewicht verdoppelte CO2-Empfindlichkeit (ECS).

Der IPCC (2021) prognostizierte eine Gleichgewichts-Verdoppelungs-CO2-Sensitivität von 3 [2 to 5] C. Allerdings betrug die beobachtete Erwärmung zwischen 1990 und 2023 (UAH 2023) lediglich 0,15 °C pro Dekade. Dies bedeutet, dass die seit langem bestehenden Vorhersagen zur mittleren globalen Erwärmung – nicht zuletzt aufgrund des kontrolltheoretischen Fehlers – um den Faktor 2 überbewertet sind.

Ein Dritteljahrhundert, nachdem die globale Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft erstmals zusammenkam, um den anthropogenen Einfluss auf das Klima zu untersuchen, hat sich gezeigt, dass die beobachtete Erwärmung innerhalb eines Jahrzehnts nur halb so groß ist wie ursprünglich (und immer noch) vorhergesagt. Darüber hinaus zeigt der Trend seit fast einem halben Jahrhundert kaum Anzeichen einer Beschleunigung.

Schritt 5: Globale Erwärmung durch weltweite Netto-Null-Emissionen gemindert

Kombiniert man diese mittelfristigen Ausgangsbedingungen, so würde die ansonsten zu erwartende globale Erwärmung, die verringert würde, wenn alle Nationen direkt in Richtung Netto-Null gehen und das Ziel bis 2050 erreichen würden, geringer sein als 1/10 C (Tabelle 1).

Schritt 5: Die globale Erwärmung wird durch die im Pariser Klimaabkommen vereinbarten Netto-Null-Ziele gemildert

Da die hauptsächlich westlichen Länder, die sich dem Pariser Klimaabkommen verpflichtet haben und für nur 30 % der neuen Emissionen verantwortlich sind, in der Praxis die einzigen Länder sind, die wesentliche Schritte in Richtung Netto-Null unternehmen, wäre die bis 2050 verringerte globale Erwärmung selbst dann geringer, wenn die vom Pariser Klimaabkommen ausgenommenen Länder ihre Emissionen nicht weiter erhöhen würden als 1/30 Jh.

Schritt 6: Die globale Erwärmung wird durch Netto-Null-Emissionen einzelner Länder gemildert

Der Beitrag jedes einzelnen westlichen Landes zu Netto-Null wäre vernachlässigbar. Wenn beispielsweise die Vereinigten Staaten, die für 12 % der weltweiten Emissionen verantwortlich sind, Netto-Null erreichen würden, würde ihr Beitrag zur Eindämmung der globalen Erwärmung bis zu diesem Jahr nur 1/100 CDas Vereinigte Königreich, das nur 0,8 % der weltweiten Emissionen verursacht, würde weniger einsparen als 1/1000 C.

Schritt 7: Die Kosten für das Erreichen von Netto-Null

Unsere Analyse geht etwas weiter als die der Professoren. Wir betrachten die globalen Kosten für das Erreichen von Netto-Null-Emissionen. Wir beginnen mit einer der wenigen verfügbaren echten Kostenzahlen, da konzertierte Anstrengungen unternommen wurden, die wahren Kosten vor der Öffentlichkeit zu verbergen.

Die globalen Kosten für das Erreichen von Netto-Null, anteilig extrapoliert aus den geschätzten 3,8 Billionen US-Dollar Kosten für die Nullung des britischen Stromnetzes, die nur 25 % aller britischen Emissionen, die wiederum nur 0,8 % aller globalen Emissionen könnten 2 Billiarden Dollar:

Schritt 8: Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Jede 1 Dollar Milliarde ausgegeben könnte verhindern nur ein 20-Millionstel Grad der globalen Erwärmung bis 2050. Selbst wenn das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis zehnmal besser als das (was nicht der Fall ist), gäbe es für Ausgaben zur Emissionsminderung keine rationale Rechtfertigung:

Machen wir uns die Schlussfolgerung der Professoren zu eigen:

„Es scheint kein glaubwürdiges Szenario zu geben, in dem eine Reduzierung der US-CO2-Emissionen auf netto Null bis zum Jahr 2050 einen Temperaturanstieg von mehr als ein paar Hundertstel Grad Celsius verhindern würde. Die damit verbundenen immensen Kosten und Opfer würden zu einer Verringerung der Erwärmung führen, die ungefähr der Messunsicherheit entspricht. Es wäre schwer, ein besseres Beispiel für eine Politik zu finden, bei der nur Schmerz herrscht und kein Gewinn erzielt wird.“

So was:

Wie Wird geladen…

Categories
Health

What we all know concerning the subsequent spherical of Covid vaccines

Pharmacist Aaron Sun prepares Pfizer’s new Covid vaccine Comirnaty at CVS Pharmacy in Eagle Rock, California.

Los Angeles Times | Getty Images

Do you think a friend or colleague should receive this newsletter? Share this link with them so they can subscribe.

Hello! It's almost that time again.

There will likely be a new round of Covid vaccinations in the coming months. Here's what we know so far about the latest vaccines.

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday advised vaccine makers to develop monovalent Covid vaccines against a highly contagious strain of the virus called JN.1, which are to be used in the United States starting this fall.

The omicron variant, JN.1, first emerged in the U.S. last summer and became the dominant strain in circulation in January. However, according to the latest data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that strain was responsible for only about 3% of all new cases in the U.S. through Saturday.

Several offshoots of JN.1.11.1, a direct descendant of JN.1, have since taken over the role of the primary strains circulating in the United States. These include KP.3, KP.2, and KP.1.1, also known as FLiRT variants.

CDC data shows that as of June 8, KP.3 accounted for a quarter of all new cases in the U.S., while KP.2 accounted for 22.5% of cases.

Federal health officials have long warned Americans to expect annual updates to Covid shots as the virus spawns new strains that can evade people's immunity from previous vaccinations or infections – protection that also wanes over time. It's similar to the U.S., where new flu vaccines are rolled out every year.

Here's what the three Covid vaccine makers have said so far.

  • Pfizer has applied to the FDA for approval of an updated mRNA vaccine against Covid against JN.1, with the goal of making the vaccine available in the fall, subject to a CDC recommendation, a spokesman said.
  • Modern has applied for FDA approval for its own updated mRNA vaccine against JN.1, according to a press release. The company said production is underway and doses of the new vaccine will be ready to ship in the U.S. as early as August.
  • Novavax The company expects to be ready to ship a protein-based Covid vaccine against JN.1 in the U.S. in September, subject to FDA and CDC approval, the company said in a press release.

The two companies each presented data last week showing that a JN.1 Covid vaccine should produce higher levels of protective antibodies against circulating variants of the virus compared to vaccines currently authorized on the market that target another omicron variant called XBB.1.5, a strain that is no longer in circulation.

Once the FDA approves each vaccine, an advisory panel must recommend the shots to the CDC and the agency itself before they can be distributed to Americans. The CDC's advisory panel is scheduled to meet later this month to vote on who should receive the new round of vaccines in the fall.

The bigger question is: How many people will actually roll up their sleeves and get vaccinated over the course of this year?

According to CDC data, as of early May, only about 22.5% of U.S. adults had received the latest round of vaccinations, which were introduced last fall.

Many Americans who had received previous Covid vaccinations said they had not gotten the final booster shot because they were not as worried about the virus, according to a November survey by the health research organization KFF. Others said they had been too busy to get vaccinated, the survey found.

The number of Covid cases in the U.S. has fallen sharply since its peak early in the pandemic, but appears to be rising again. The U.S. weekly test positivity rate was 4.5% on June 1, compared to 4.1% the week before and 3.4% the week before that, according to CDC data.

We will continue to monitor the new round of Covid vaccines as we approach fall.

Feel free to send tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at annikakim.constantino@nbcuni.com.

Latest technology in healthcare

White House partners with Microsoft and Google on cybersecurity for rural hospitals

An American flag flies in front of OSF Saint Paul Medical Center in Mendota, Illinois, on April 14, 2020.

Daniel Acker | Bloomberg |

The White House announced on Monday Microsoft And Google have agreed to provide free and low-cost cybersecurity resources to rural hospitals across the U.S. as the healthcare sector works to fend off a growing number of attackers.

According to a press release, cyberattacks on the healthcare system increased by 128% from 2022 to 2023, and the number of major breaches in the sector reached a record high last year. The attacks show no signs of stopping, as major healthcare systems and companies have been plagued by security breaches in recent months.

For example, in February, Change Healthcare, a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, was the victim of a major cyberattack that prevented thousands of doctors from filling prescriptions, requesting benefits or being paid for their services. The White House called the attack “one of the most significant cyberattacks in healthcare to date.”

Maintaining cybersecurity infrastructure is complex and expensive, and breaches often require “personnel-intensive manual workarounds” that can be particularly burdensome for small rural hospitals, the White House said. That's why the Biden administration has called on technology companies like Microsoft and Google to offer additional support.

Microsoft announced in a press release that it will offer rural emergency and critical access hospitals up to 75% off its security products tailored to smaller organizations. The company said it will offer some larger rural hospitals its “most advanced” security suite for free for a year, and participating rural hospitals can also get free security updates for Windows 10.

Rural hospitals can access free cybersecurity assessments and training through Microsoft and its partners to identify risks and gaps in systems, the company said.

Google said it will offer free “endpoint security consulting” to rural hospitals and nonprofit organizations, meaning the company will help organizations make their devices, such as laptops and desktops, harder to attack.

Taylor Lehmann, head of the Office of the Chief Information Security Officer at Google Cloud, said Google is also helping organizations set up platforms like Google Workspace and systems like Chrome and ChromeOS that have security built in. The company is offering funding to help organizations make the transition, Lehmann added.

“The belief that this problem will simply go away or that the bad guys simply have bigger goals [is] not right,” he said in an interview with CNBC. “Hope is not a strategy, especially when the market for attackers is so indiscriminate.”

Lehmann said Google is also putting together a pilot program with some rural hospitals to develop a free or low-cost package of tools that it could offer to similar organizations on a larger scale in the future.

“It's very encouraging to see this activity. I think it's been a long time coming, and I think there's more to do here,” he said. “It's going in the right direction, I would say, in terms of bringing attention to some of these really critical issues that we're seeing.”

You can read the full White House press release here.

Feel free to send tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Ashley at ashley.capoot@nbcuni.com.

Categories
Sport

Dodgers purchase Cavan Biggio in alternate with Blue Jays

  • Jeff Passan, ESPNJune 12, 2024, 9:21 a.m. ET

    Close

      ESPN MLB Insider
      Author of “The Arm: The Billion-Dollar Secret of Sports’ Most Valuable Commodity”

The Los Angeles Dodgers have signed super utility player Cavan Biggio in a trade with the Toronto Blue Jays after the Blue Jays designated him for reassignment last week.

As part of the deal, the Blue Jays receive right-handed reliever Braydon Fisher, who has split his time between Double-A and Triple-A this season.

Biggio, 29, was released from the Blue Jays' 40-man roster last week after struggling in the first third of the season. He hit .200/.323/.291 with two home runs in 131 at-bats for Toronto, which is third in the American League East at 33-34.

Editor's Favorites

He has spent most of his career at second base, but has also played first, third and right base this season. Biggio will join a Dodgers team that holds a 7½-game lead in the National League West but has minimal offensive production from Chris Taylor, Gavin Lux and Kiké Hernández and is without third baseman Max Muncy, who is on the injured list with an oblique abdominal muscle strain.

Biggio debuted in 2019 and was one of three sons of longtime major league players expected to form the core of an up-and-coming Blue Jays team, along with infielder Vladimir Guerrero Jr. and shortstop Bo Bichette. He hit 16 home runs in 100 games in his rookie season and posted a .375 on-base percentage in the COVID-shortened 2020, looking like a foundational piece at second base.

Biggio has been limited by injuries in the years since, losing playing time to Davis Schneider and Isiah Kiner-Falefa this season. With the Blue Jays struggling offensively, they released him to make room for Spencer Horwitz, who has started all four games at second base since being recalled. Biggio is under club control for one more season after this year and will be eligible to be a free agent after 2025.

Fisher, 23, was drafted in the fourth round in 2018 and has struck out 30 hitters and allowed 15 walks in 19 innings while posting a 5.68 ERA this season.

Categories
Entertainment

Southern Mississippi soccer participant Marcus Daniels Jr. dies at age 21

The University of Southern Mississippi mourns the loss of a classmate.

Marcus “MJ” Daniels Jr.a senior who played defensive back for the school's football team died June 11 after being shot at an off-campus apartment complex in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, Hattiesburg police confirmed. He was 21 years old.

Daniels was found unconscious in his vehicle and crime scene investigators confirmed he was pronounced dead at the scene, according to the department's press release. Police Chief Hardy Sims He also urged anyone with further information to come forward.

“Our condolences and prayers go out to the Daniels family,” he said in the statement. “We are doing everything we can to find the perpetrators and bring justice to the victim and his family. We will share as much information as possible without compromising the investigation. We are working closely with the university and local authorities.”