Open thread – watts with that?

High costs/kWh of W/S systems that have been pushed on a brainwashing
What is generally not known, the more weather-dependent W/S systems are the other conventional generators, which inefficiently counteract the increasingly greater heights and depths of the W/S performance. See URL
https://www.winddaskforce.org/blogs/fuel-and-co2-rections-due-t-t-wind-energy- Less-than-Claimed
.
W/S systems increase the total tax of electricity for electricity. The more W/S systems, the higher the costs/kWh, as in Great Britain and Germany, with the highest electricity rates in Europe and near zero growth BIPS, with the highest electricity rates
At around 30% W/S, the entire system hits an increasingly thicker concrete wall that is operational and more precious.
Great Britain and Germany drove more and more hours to the wall every day.
The electricity costs delivered to the users rose with each additional W/S/B system
.
Basic load core, gas and coal, aquatic plants are the only rational way forward, and the additional CO2 is very advantageous for additional flora and fauna growth and increased crop yields to feed hungry people.
https://www.winddaskforce.org/profles/blogs/wearein-a-co2-famine
.
The subsidies shift the costs of project owners to interest payers, taxpayers, state debts:
1) Tax credits by the federal government and the state, up to 50% (tax credit of 10 percent – federal tax credit of 30 percent – state tax credit and other incentives of up to 10%);
2) 5-y accelerated depreciation from the entire project;
3) Loan interest rate deduction
.
The subsidies reduce the ownership and operating costs of a project by 50%, which means that electricity can be sold at 50% less than production.
Pay supply companies 15 c/kWhWholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity of resolved Offshore wind systems
Pay supply companies 18 C/kWhWholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity of floating Offshore wind
Pay supply companies 12 c/kWhWholesale, after 50% subsidies, for electricity of Larger solar Systems
.
Excluded costs, in future 30% without annual penetration into the network, based on Great Britain and German experience:
-Onshore grid expansion/reinforcement to connect distributed W/S systems, for example 2 C/kWh
-A fleet of traditional power plants to counteract quickly with variable edition, less than minute to minute, 24/7/365, which for more BTU/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more costs of leading approx. 2 C/kWh
-A fleet of traditional power plants, in 1) periods with low wind, 2), in the morning to store the rotors, and 3) low solar days during tomorrow, in the evening, night, snow/ice on panels, which leads to more BTU/kWh, more CO2/kWh, more costs for the cost of more costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for the cost of more costs Costs for costs for more costs for the costs for the cost of more costs for costs for the costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for more prices for more prices for more pricing costs for more costs for more costs for costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for more costs for more price costs. approx. 2 C/kWh
– Pay with system owners for electricity could have produced, if not limited, approx. 1 C/kWh
– Import electricity to high prices when the W/S power is low1 c/kWh
– Export electricity at low prices when the W/S production is high1 c/kWh
– disassembly on land and at sea, reprocessing and storage at dangerous waste, stations, approx. 2 C/kWh
Some of these values ​​increase exponentially when more W/S systems are added to the network
.
The economic/financial madness and environmental damage from everything are from the charts.
No sore
This economy was bound to knots by crazy people.
Your taxpayers build these projects so that you have much higher electricity invoices.
Remove your tax money with your voice and none of these projects would be built, and your electricity invoices would be lower