Categories
Technology

This tiny particle accelerator suits into a big room, making it way more sensible than the one from CERN

As scientists prepared to collapse the first particles in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in 2010, parts of the media dreamed that the EU-wide experiment could create a black hole that could swallow and destroy our planet. How on earth, columnists rage, could scientists justify such a dangerous indulgence for the pursuit of abstract, theoretical knowledge?

However, particle accelerators are much more than just giant toys that scientists can play with. They also have practical uses, although their sheer size has so far prevented their widespread use. Now, as part of a large-scale European collaboration, my team has published a report that explains in detail how a much smaller particle accelerator can be built – closer to the size of a large room than a big city.

Inspired by the technological and scientific know-how of machines like the LHC, our particle accelerator is designed to be as small as possible so that it can be used immediately in industry, healthcare and universities.

Collider area

The world’s largest collider, the LHC, uses particle acceleration to achieve the amazing speeds at which it collides particles. This system was used to measure the coveted Higgs boson particle – one of the most elusive particles predicted by the Standard Model. This is our current model for describing the structure and functioning of the universe.

Since the early 1930s, there have been fewer giant and glamorous particle accelerators performing useful tasks and causing collisions to improve our understanding of basic research. Accelerated particles are used to create radioactive materials and powerful radiation explosions, which are critical to health processes such as radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, and CT scans.

The typical disadvantage of accelerators is that they are bulky, complex to operate, and often prohibitively expensive. The LHC is a pinnacle of experimental physics, but it is 27 kilometers in circumference and costs 6.5 billion Swiss francs (5.2 billion pounds) to build and test. The accelerators currently installed in select hospitals are smaller and cheaper, but still cost tens of millions of pounds and require 400 x 400 m of space to install. Therefore, only large regional hospitals can afford the money and space for a radiation therapy department.

[Read: How do you build a pet-friendly gadget? We asked experts and animal owners]

Why exactly do accelerators have to be so big? The simple answer is, if they were smaller they would break. Since they are based on solid materials, increasing the performance too much would tear the system apart and create a very expensive mess.

The Large Hadron Collider is a huge loop system on the border between France and Switzerland. Cern

Need for speed

We wanted to find a way to make smaller, cheaper particle accelerators for use in a larger number of hospitals – from large and regional to small and provincial.

Our team assumed that you have two options for accelerating particles: either a strong push over a short distance or a lot of small nudges over a long distance – this is how the LHC works.

It’s a bit like going 100 mph in a vehicle: you can either accelerate slowly in a truck over a long period of time, or you can put your foot in a sports car and get there in seconds. Conventional accelerators are a bit like trucks: reliable and docile, but slow. We were looking for an alternative to sports cars.

We found this alternative in plasma. The beauty of plasma is that it consists only of an ionized gas: a gas that has been broken down into its smallest components. As such, it does not have the same limit on performance that can be applied to it as a solid system. In fact, you can’t break something that’s already broken.

A man holds a clear component in front of his eye.  Behind him is a big yellow pipeA researcher holding part of our novel particle accelerator in his hand. Behind it is the corresponding section of a conventional accelerator. EuPRAXIA Conceptual Design Report, author provided

In this sense, plasmas can withstand much higher acceleration forces – up to a thousand times greater than a solid-state accelerator. The higher the power, the shorter the time and distance it takes to accelerate particles, and this results in smaller, cheaper accelerators.

Our accelerator uses powerful lasers to “shake” the plasmas it contains and to move their particles in such a way that waves are created. It’s a bit like the trail a boat (the laser) left on a lake (the plasma). Like a surfer, a beam placed on one of these waves can be pushed forward by it and constantly accelerate. These waves within plasmas are very small (sub-millimeters) and very strong, which means that the overall accelerator can be extremely small.

Plasma benefits

Plasma-based particle accelerators like ours require 100 times less space than existing structures, reducing the space required for installation from 400 x 400 m to just 40 x 40 m. The hardware needed to build our accelerator is cheaper to install, run, and maintain. Overall, we expect our plasma accelerator to reduce the cost of installing an accelerator in a hospital by a factor of ten.

Four different scanned images of a mouseA mouse embryo scanned with our machine (left column) and conventional scans (right column).

In addition to these two benefits, our accelerator can perform certain new functions that existing accelerators cannot. For example, plasma-based accelerators can provide detailed x-rays of biological samples with far greater clarity than those that exist today. By providing a better picture of the inside of a human body, doctors could find cancer at a much earlier stage and dramatically increase the chance of successfully treating the disease.

The same high-resolution imaging can also help identify the first signs of cracks and defects on machines in the nanometer range. Failures related to such failures are considered one of the “six big losses” known to manufacturers. Their early detection by our accelerator could help to extend the service life of high-precision, high-quality components in heavy industry and in manufacturing.

Accelerator rollout

The European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures will evaluate the draft report with a decision expected in summer 2021. If successful, it is expected that construction of the first two prototypes will be completed by 2030 and access to external users will be granted immediately thereafter.

It took us several years of interdisciplinary research to develop the first detailed and realistic design of such a machine. Our plasma accelerator is the latest example of how obscure, abstract, fundamental physics can invade our daily lives – cut research costs, improve manufacturing, and save lives.

This article by Gianluca Sarri, Reader (Associate Professor) in the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics at Queen’s University in Belfast, is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read on: Can Auditing Remove Algorithmic Bias?

Categories
Entertainment

Jayda Cheaves responds to a commenter who requested about her different presents from Lil Child whereas he was promoting her jeep

Earlier this week we reported that Jayda Cheaves sold her Jeep under the whisper that she and Lil ‘baby are no longer together.

Although the photo was posted on the seller’s page in November 2020, it appears one commenter has really invested in what may have happened.

The person on the account wanted to know about the other vehicles and gifts that the rapper Jayda had bought.

In an Instagram post on Jayda’s page, the commenter said: “Ask Jayda, you sold the pink jeep, what about the other car you got from Christmas and what about the jewelry he gave you, to whom you gave it back [?]”

Jayda replied, “Do you think if I sold a car that was petty, I would sell the cheapest if I had two in my garage that are worth more? [Y]”It can’t all be so crazy and please not under my baby post.”

Jayda also stated that she sold the jeep for safety reasons. She read Instagram stories a few days ago and said, “I got rid of my jeep because I had an incident one night while driving it. Nothing more, nothing less. Safety comes first! “

As previously reported, Jayda Cheaves opened on Instagram and hinted at a possible breakup with Lil Baby.

In an IG story and video message, Jayda talked about never being single. Jayda stated, “I’ve been in relationships all my life since high school. I don’t even know how to be single. I have to learn all over again. “

Jayda also posted a video stating, “I swear I’m not like one of the girls who come on the internet with every problem. But I just need you to know about everything sometimes The glitz and glamor, that’s real life. I’ll go through the same thing until you go through it. Even more s ** t [than] you go through All of us humans at the end of the day. We all have problems. “

As you know, this comes a few months after Lil ‘baby allegedly slept with a Las Vegas pornstar.

Would you like updates directly in your text inbox? Contact us at 917-722-8057 or https://my.community.com/theshaderoom

Categories
Science

Huge reset architects are celebrating the orderly calm of the Covid Lockdown cities – what is the level?

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

h / t Breitbart; The World Economic Forum released a hastily withdrawn video celebrating the peace and quiet of cities whose factories and people have been silenced by tough Covid lockdowns. The WEF organizes the famous annual Davos event, where the world’s elite meet every year to discuss common interests.

I’ve included a copy of the video below in case the original tweet is censored by Twitter.

Unfortunately, your browser does not support the video tag.

Von Breitbart;

The WEF, whose main body is promoting Klaus Schwab’s idea of ​​a so-called “Great Reset” of the global economic order, was largely ridiculed for this post, among others by the former MEP of the Brexit party, who became the political commentator Martin Daubney, who to the The first one was to tag the video before it was taken down. Daubney later republished the video and exposed the WEF to criticism.

Speaking to Breitbart London, Mr Daubney said, “I’m glad you tweeted this – because it exposed them for the touchless crackpots that they are. The WEF sees humanity as a disease that needs to be controlled and imprisoned in order to achieve arbitrary climate change goals.

“There is only one problem, the public is not going to play along with their big reset nonsense. All the things the WEF wants to stop: work, travel, capitalism, are the things the vast majority of humanity lives for. The WEF has revealed itself to be ridiculously non-contact with the everyday man and woman. Protected in their ivory towers, they treat the rest of us with absolute seething contempt. “

Read more: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/02/27/great-reset-wef-hails-quieter-lockdown-cities-as-businesses-collapse/

A former school friend once said what he didn’t like about capitalism was that it was so unstructured. He told me the parable of the garden and compared the disordered, weed-infested capitalist garden with the environmentally friendly socialist garden, with everything in its place, neatly ordered rows of vegetables in which weeds are uprooted and disposed of.

My answer was, “Yes, but in your example, ordinary people are the weeds. They suggest that anyone who does not fit your structured view of society perfectly be uprooted and disposed of because the crime does not fit perfectly. “

Did I mention we’re not friends anymore? My former friend could not accept my rejection of climate protection measures.

People like the Great Reset architect Klaus Schwab scare me; people who seem to think of orderliness, order and strong government are more important than happiness and freedom.

The founder of the World Economic Forum and Great Reset architect Klaus Schwab was born in Germany in 1938.

4.8
6th
be right

Item rating

Like this:

To like Loading…

Categories
Sport

LeBron James from Los Angeles Lakers to Zlatan Ibrahimovic

LeBron James on Friday denied Zlatan Ibrahimovic’s criticism of his social activism, saying the AC Milan star’s comments were hypocritical.

Ibrahimovic, whose season coincided with James’ first season at the Lakers for his former team, LA Galaxy, criticized James in an interview with UEFA on Thursday for Discovery + in Sweden, saying it was a “mistake” and “not a mistake” “Looking good” when James and other “famous” people get involved in politics.

“He was the same guy who said when he was back in Sweden … because his last name wasn’t a specific last name, he felt like there was racism when he was on the pitch,” said James. “I speak from a very educated mind, so I’m the wrong one for doing my homework.”

A few years ago Ibrahimovic said he was exposed to “covert racism” in his Swedish homeland because his Bosnian roots gave him a surname that doesn’t sound traditionally Swedish.

“I’m not Andersson or Svensson,” Ibrahimovic told Canal + in 2018, referring to what he saw as racist treatment by the media. “If I were, trust me, they would defend me, even if I robbed a bank. They would defend me, I tell you.”

James didn’t let Ibrahimovic’s attitude towards him put him off, explaining why he approaches extrajudicial issues the way he does.

“I would never shut up if something was wrong,” said James after the Lakers’ 102-93 win over the Trail Blazers on Friday night. “I preach about my people and I preach about equality. Social injustice. Racism. Systematic suppression of voters. Things that are going on in our church.

“Because I was a part of my church once and saw the things that were going on and I know what’s going on because I have a group of over 300 kids at my school going through the same thing, and you need a voice. And I am their voice. I am their voice and I am using my platform to continue shedding light on anything that may be going on, not just in my community, but in this country and around the world .

“There is no way I would ever stick to sports just because I understand how this platform is and how powerful my voice is.”

James went on to pay tribute to former WNBA player Renee Montgomery, who became a partner in the Atlanta Dream Friday after the league put pressure on former Senator Kelly Loeffler, a Republican who opposed the WNBA’s racial justice initiatives last summer -Player expressed their share of the team.

“You can just ask Renee Montgomery if I would have shut up and just dripped [what would have happened]”Said James, later referring to the two-time WNBA champion as a” beautiful black woman “.

James also credited Jaylen Brown of the Boston Celtics, Patrick Mahomes of the Kansas City Chiefs, and Alvin Kamara of the New Orleans Saints for their commitment to social justice issues.

“I am proud to be part of a generation where our voices are heard and the boys speak from an educated mindset,” said James. “But more importantly, when you speak from your heart, it rings even louder.

“And we have a lot of people who speak from the heart and don’t believe that at some point they had a voice, or now they come in and see that they can have a voice and that their voice really matters. That matters me proud. “

In addition to educating hundreds of children at risk in its hometown, James ‘I Promise School in Akron, Ohio provides affordable housing, a meal program, and professional education for the students’ families.

His organization More Than a Vote was also instrumental in mobilizing more than 40,000 volunteers to work at polling stations in the November general election to prevent voter repression.

“As athletes, we’ve heard this a long time,” said James. “You should [feel] privileged. You should be grateful to be able to dribble a ball or play a soccer ball or take the 100 yard shot or swing a baseball bat and things like that. You shouldn’t be able to talk about anything else, right or wrong, you should just do that. That’s not the case. That is no longer the case. As long as I’m there, it won’t be like that for a long time. “

Categories
Health

2 individuals had extreme allergic reactions after receiving the Covid vaccine

Empty vials containing a dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine against the COVID-19 coronavirus lie on a table as South Africa resumes its vaccination campaign at Klerksdorp Hospital on February 18, 2021.

Phill Magakoe | AFP | Getty Images

Two study participants suffered severe allergic reactions shortly after receiving the Covid-19 vaccine from Johnson & Johnson, a J&J scientist told an FDA panel on Friday.

J&J was first briefed on the allergic reactions on Wednesday, Macaya Douoguih, director of clinical development and medical affairs for the vaccines division at J&J, Janssen, told the FDA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Related Biological Products.

One of the people took part in an ongoing study in South Africa and developed anaphylaxis, a severe and life-threatening allergic reaction, after receiving the vaccine.

She did not provide details on the second person’s reaction.

“We will continue to monitor these events closely,” she told the panel.

To date, there have been no reports of anaphylaxis in J & J’s clinical study. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is currently overseeing events such as the introduction of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines by states and pharmacies.

There were 46 reports of anaphylaxis in patients who received Pfizer’s vaccine and 16 cases in patients who received Moderna’s vaccine, according to a CDC report released on February 16. The agency said the incidence of the reaction is within the range of cases reported for the influenza vaccine.

The CDC urges healthcare providers to monitor patients for 15 minutes after vaccination and for 30 minutes for patients with a history of allergic reactions.

If someone has a severe allergic reaction after the first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine, the CDC recommends not receiving the second dose, even if the allergic reaction wasn’t severe enough to require emergency care.

Categories
Technology

Kann die Prüfung Verzerrungen durch Algorithmen beseitigen?

Seit mehr als einem Jahrzehnt schreiben Journalisten und Forscher über die Gefahren, sich auf Algorithmen zu verlassen, um wichtige Entscheidungen zu treffen: Wer wird eingesperrt, wer bekommt einen Job, wer bekommt einen Kredit – selbst wer hat Priorität für COVID-19-Impfstoffe.

Anstatt Verzerrungen zu beseitigen, hat ein Algorithmus nach dem anderen sie kodifiziert und fortgeführt, da Unternehmen gleichzeitig ihre Algorithmen mehr oder weniger vor öffentlicher Kontrolle geschützt haben.

Die große Frage seitdem: Wie lösen wir dieses Problem? Gesetzgeber und Forscher haben sich für algorithmische Audits ausgesprochen, bei denen Algorithmen analysiert und einem Stresstest unterzogen werden, um festzustellen, wie sie funktionieren und ob sie ihre festgelegten Ziele erreichen oder voreingenommene Ergebnisse erzielen. Und es gibt ein wachsendes Feld privater Wirtschaftsprüfungsunternehmen, die vorgeben, genau das zu tun. Unternehmen wenden sich zunehmend an diese Unternehmen, um ihre Algorithmen zu überprüfen, insbesondere wenn sie wegen voreingenommener Ergebnisse kritisiert wurden. Es ist jedoch nicht klar, ob solche Audits Algorithmen tatsächlich weniger voreingenommen machen – oder ob sie einfach gute PR sind.

Die algorithmische Prüfung wurde in letzter Zeit vielfach kritisiert, als HireVue, ein beliebtes Unternehmen für Einstellungssoftware, das von Unternehmen wie Walmart und Goldman Sachs eingesetzt wird, kritisiert wurde, dass die Algorithmen zur Bewertung von Kandidaten durch Videointerviews voreingenommen waren.

HireVue hat eine Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft um Hilfe gebeten und im Januar die Ergebnisse der Wirtschaftsprüfung in einer Pressemitteilung angepriesen.

Bei der Prüfung wurde festgestellt, dass die Prognosen der Software in Bezug auf Fairness- und Bias-Probleme wie angekündigt funktionieren “, sagte HireVue in einer Pressemitteilung und zitierte die von ihr beauftragte Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft O’Neil Risk Consulting & Algorithmic Auditing (ORCAA).

Trotz Änderungen an seinem Prozess, einschließlich der Eliminierung von Videos aus den Interviews, wurde HireVue weithin vorgeworfen, das Audit – das sich eng mit einem Einstellungstest für Kandidaten für eine frühe Karriere befasste, nicht mit dem gesamten Bewertungsprozess für Kandidaten von HireVue – als PR-Stunt zu verwenden.

Artikel in Fast Company, VentureBeat und MIT Technology Review forderten das Unternehmen auf, das Audit falsch zu charakterisieren.

HireVue erklärte, es sei für die Prüfung transparent, indem der Bericht öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werde, und fügte hinzu, dass in der Pressemitteilung angegeben wurde, dass die Prüfung nur für ein bestimmtes Szenario bestimmt sei.

“Während HireVue für jede Art von Prüfung offen war, einschließlich einer Prüfung, bei der unser Prozess im Allgemeinen betrachtet wurde, bat ORCAA darum, sich auf einen einzigen Anwendungsfall zu konzentrieren, um konkrete Diskussionen über das System zu ermöglichen”, sagte Lindsey Zuloaga, Chief Data Scientist von HireVue eine E-Mail. “Wir haben mit ORCAA zusammengearbeitet, um einen repräsentativen Anwendungsfall auszuwählen, der sich erheblich mit den Bewertungen der meisten HireVue-Kandidaten überschneidet.”

[Read: How do you build a pet-friendly gadget? We asked experts and animal owners]

Aber auch algorithmische Prüfer waren über die öffentlichen Erklärungen von HireVue zur Prüfung unzufrieden.

„Bei der Umnutzung [ORCAA’s] Durch eine sehr sorgfältige Analyse der Marketingmaterialien untergraben sie die Legitimität des gesamten Bereichs “, sagte Liz O’Sullivan, Mitbegründerin von Arthur, einem Startup für KI-Erklärbarkeit und Bias-Überwachung.

Und das ist das Problem bei der algorithmischen Prüfung als Instrument zur Beseitigung von Verzerrungen: Unternehmen könnten sie verwenden, um echte Verbesserungen vorzunehmen, aber möglicherweise nicht. Und es gibt keine Industriestandards oder Vorschriften, die die Wirtschaftsprüfer oder die Unternehmen, die sie zur Rechenschaft ziehen, zur Rechenschaft ziehen.

Was ist algorithmische Prüfung – wie funktioniert sie?

Gute Frage – es ist ein ziemlich undefiniertes Feld. Im Allgemeinen laufen Audits auf verschiedene Arten ab: indem der Code eines Algorithmus und die Daten aus seinen Ergebnissen betrachtet werden oder indem die möglichen Auswirkungen eines Algorithmus durch Interviews und Workshops mit Mitarbeitern betrachtet werden.

Mithilfe von Audits mit Zugriff auf den Code eines Algorithmus können Prüfer beurteilen, ob die Trainingsdaten des Algorithmus verzerrt sind, und hypothetische Szenarien erstellen, um die Auswirkungen auf verschiedene Populationen zu testen.

Es gibt nur etwa 10 bis 20 seriöse Firmen, die algorithmische Überprüfungen anbieten, sagte Rumman Chowdhury, Twitter-Direktor für Ethik des maschinellen Lernens und Gründer des algorithmischen Prüfungsunternehmens Parity. Unternehmen verfügen möglicherweise auch über eigene interne Revisionsteams, die sich mit Algorithmen befassen, bevor sie der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht werden.

Im Jahr 2016 förderte ein Bericht der Obama-Regierung über algorithmische Systeme und Bürgerrechte die Entwicklung einer algorithmischen Prüfungsbranche. Die Einstellung eines Wirtschaftsprüfers ist jedoch nach wie vor keine gängige Praxis, da Unternehmen nicht dazu verpflichtet sind. Laut mehreren Wirtschaftsprüfern möchten Unternehmen nicht die Prüfung oder potenzielle rechtliche Probleme, die diese Prüfung möglicherweise aufwirft, insbesondere für Produkte, die sie vermarkten.

“Anwälte sagen mir:” Wenn wir Sie einstellen und herausfinden, dass es ein Problem gibt, das wir nicht beheben können, haben wir die plausible Leugnung verloren und wollen nicht die nächste Zigarettenfirma sein “, so die Gründerin von ORCAA, Cathy O. Neil, sagte. “Das ist der häufigste Grund, warum ich keinen Job bekomme.”

Für diejenigen, die Wirtschaftsprüfer einstellen, gibt es keine Standards dafür, was eine „Prüfung“ beinhalten sollte. Selbst ein Gesetzesvorschlag in New York City, der jährliche Prüfungen von Einstellungsalgorithmen vorschreibt, legt nicht fest, wie die Prüfungen durchgeführt werden sollten. Ein Gütesiegel eines Abschlussprüfers könnte viel mehr Kontrolle bedeuten als das eines anderen.

Und da Prüfungsberichte auch fast immer an Geheimhaltungsvereinbarungen gebunden sind, können die Unternehmen ihre Arbeit nicht miteinander vergleichen.

“Das große Problem ist, dass wir feststellen werden, dass wir, wenn dieses Feld lukrativer wird, wirklich Standards für die Prüfung benötigen”, sagte Chowdhury. “Es gibt viele Leute da draußen, die bereit sind, etwas als Audit zu bezeichnen, eine gut aussehende Website zu erstellen und es als Tag zu bezeichnen und Bargeld ohne Standards zu verdienen.”

Und Tech-Unternehmen sind nicht immer bereit, selbst mit den Auditoren, die sie einstellen, sagen einige Auditoren.

“Wir haben diese Situation, in der Geschäftsgeheimnisse ein guter Grund sind, diese Algorithmen dunkel und im Dunkeln arbeiten zu lassen, und das können wir nicht haben”, sagte Arthurs O’Sullivan.

Auditoren befanden sich in Szenarien, in denen sie keinen Zugriff auf den Code der Software haben und daher möglicherweise gegen Computerzugriffsgesetze verstoßen, sagte Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Auditorin und Forschungsmitarbeiterin bei der Algorithmic Justice League. Chowdhury sagte, sie habe Audits abgelehnt, als Unternehmen verlangten, dass sie ihnen erlauben, sie vor der Veröffentlichung zu überprüfen.

Für die Prüfung von HireVue befragte ORCAA Stakeholder, darunter HireVue-Mitarbeiter, Kunden, Bewerber und Experten für algorithmische Fairness, und identifizierte Bedenken, die das Unternehmen berücksichtigen musste, sagte Zuloaga.

Bei der Bewertung von ORCAA wurden die technischen Details der HireVue-Algorithmen nicht berücksichtigt – beispielsweise die Daten, auf denen der Algorithmus trainiert wurde, oder der Code -, obwohl Zuloaga sagte, das Unternehmen habe den Zugriff der Prüfer in keiner Weise eingeschränkt.

“ORCAA bat um Details zu diesen Analysen, aber ihr Ansatz konzentrierte sich darauf, zu untersuchen, wie Stakeholder von dem Algorithmus betroffen sind”, sagte Zuloaga.

O’Neil sagte, sie könne das HireVue-Audit nicht kommentieren.

Viele Audits werden durchgeführt, bevor Produkte veröffentlicht werden, aber das heißt nicht, dass sie nicht auf Probleme stoßen, da Algorithmen nicht im luftleeren Raum existieren. Nehmen wir zum Beispiel, als Microsoft einen Chatbot erstellte, der schnell rassistisch wurde, sobald er Twitter-Nutzern ausgesetzt war.

“Sobald Sie es in die reale Welt gebracht haben, können eine Million Dinge schief gehen, selbst mit den besten Absichten”, sagte O’Sullivan. „Der Rahmen, den wir gerne annehmen würden, ist, dass es nicht gut genug gibt. Es gibt immer Möglichkeiten, die Dinge fairer zu gestalten. “

Einige Prerelease-Audits bieten daher auch eine kontinuierliche Überwachung, obwohl dies nicht üblich ist. Die Praxis gewinnt bei Banken und Gesundheitsunternehmen an Dynamik, sagte O’Sullivan.

Die Überwachungsfirma von O’Sullivan installiert ein Dashboard, das nach Anomalien in Algorithmen sucht, in denen sie verwendet werden Echtzeit. Zum Beispiel würde es Unternehmen Monate nach dem Start alarmieren, wenn ihre Algorithmen mehr weibliche Antragsteller für Kredite ablehnen würden.

Und schließlich gibt es auch eine wachsende Zahl von kontroversen Audits, die größtenteils von Forschern und einigen Journalisten durchgeführt werden und Algorithmen ohne Zustimmung eines Unternehmens überprüfen. Nehmen wir zum Beispiel Raji und Joy Buolamwini, Gründer der Algorithmic Justice League, deren Arbeit am Rekognition-Tool von Amazon deutlich machte, wie rassistisch und geschlechtsspezifisch die Software war, ohne dass das Unternehmen daran beteiligt war.

Korrigieren Unternehmen ihre Algorithmen nach einem Audit?

Es gibt keine Garantie, dass Unternehmen die bei einer Prüfung aufgeworfenen Fragen angehen.

“Sie können ein Qualitätsaudit durchführen lassen und trotzdem keine Rechenschaftspflicht vom Unternehmen erhalten”, sagte Raji. “Es erfordert viel Energie, um die Lücke zwischen dem Erhalten der Prüfungsergebnisse und der anschließenden Umsetzung in Rechenschaftspflicht zu schließen.”

Der öffentliche Druck kann Unternehmen manchmal dazu bringen, sich mit der algorithmischen Verzerrung der Technologie zu befassen – oder mit Audits, die nicht auf Geheiß des Technologieunternehmens durchgeführt wurden und unter eine Geheimhaltungsvereinbarung fallen.

Raji sagte, die Gender Shades-Studie, in der geschlechtsspezifische und rassistische Vorurteile in kommerziellen Gesichtserkennungstools festgestellt wurden, nannte Unternehmen wie IBM und Microsoft, um ein öffentliches Gespräch darüber zu führen.

Aber es kann schwierig sein, die algorithmische Rechenschaftspflicht in Schwung zu bringen, sagte sie.

Während Verzerrungen bei der Gesichtserkennung erkennbar sind – Menschen können Fotos und die Fehlerraten sehen und die Konsequenzen von rassistischen und geschlechtsspezifischen Verzerrungen in der Technologie verstehen -, kann es schwieriger sein, sich auf Verzerrungen bei Zinsalgorithmen zu beziehen.

“Es ist ein bisschen traurig, dass wir uns so sehr auf öffentlichen Aufschrei verlassen”, sagte Raji. „Wenn die Öffentlichkeit es nicht versteht, gibt es keine Geldstrafe, es gibt keine rechtlichen Auswirkungen. Und das macht es sehr frustrierend. “

Was kann also getan werden, um die algorithmische Prüfung zu verbessern?

Im Jahr 2019 führte eine Gruppe demokratischer Gesetzgeber das Bundesgesetz über die algorithmische Rechenschaftspflicht ein, nach dem Unternehmen ihre Algorithmen prüfen und alle von den Prüfungen aufgedeckten Verzerrungsprobleme angehen müssten, bevor sie in Betrieb genommen werden.

AI For the People-Gründer Mutale Nkonde war Teil eines Teams von Technologen, die bei der Ausarbeitung des Gesetzentwurfs behilflich waren, und sagte, es hätte Regierungsmandate für Unternehmen geschaffen, um beide Prüfungen durchzuführen und diese Prüfungen durchzuführen.

“Ähnlich wie bei Drogentests müsste es eine Art Agentur wie die Food and Drug Administration geben, die sich mit Algorithmen befasst”, sagte sie. “Wenn wir die unterschiedlichen Auswirkungen sehen würden, würde dieser Algorithmus nicht auf den Markt gebracht.”

Die Rechnung hat es nie zu einer Abstimmung geschafft.

Senator Ron Wyden, ein Demokrat aus Oregon, sagte, er plane, die Gesetzesvorlage mit Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) und Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-NY) mit Aktualisierungen der Version 2019 wieder einzuführen. Es ist unklar, ob der Gesetzentwurf Standards für Audits festlegen würde, aber es würde erfordern, dass Unternehmen auf ihre Ergebnisse reagieren.

“Ich stimme zu, dass Forscher, Industrie und Regierung darauf hinarbeiten müssen, anerkannte Benchmarks für die Prüfung von KI festzulegen, um sicherzustellen, dass Prüfungen so effektiv wie möglich sind”, sagte Wyden in einer Erklärung. „Es steht jedoch zu viel auf dem Spiel, um auf einen vollständigen akademischen Konsens zu warten, bevor der Kongress Maßnahmen zum Schutz vor Verzerrungen durch automatisierte Systeme ergreift. Ich bin der Meinung, dass wir an beiden Tracks arbeiten müssen. “

Dieser Artikel wurde ursprünglich auf The Markup veröffentlicht und unter der Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-Lizenz erneut veröffentlicht.

Veröffentlicht am 27. Februar 2021 – 14:00 UTC

Categories
Science

Some earth lives might already survive on Mars

The surface of Mars is a harsh environment for life. But life on earth is also notoriously resilient. Nobody is quite sure yet how microbes from Earth would develop on the surface of Mars. However, the impact of possible transmigration of microbes to the red planet could be immense. Not only could it skew the results of a possible real life on Mars, it could also completely destroy the nascent Mars biosphere.

To understand whether so much disruption is really possible, we must first understand whether any earthly life can survive on Mars itself. According to a new study recently published in Frontiers in Microbiology, the answer to that is yes.

UT discussion about whether we have accidentally infected Mars.

The research, led by a team of scientists from NASA and the German Aerospace Center, used a unique approach to test the viability of living bacteria on the surface of Mars. They sent it into the stratosphere in a balloon.

The stratosphere is surprisingly similar to the surface of Mars, especially in terms of radiation and temperature. The researchers introduced bacteria into this environment using a tool called “Microbes in the Atmosphere for Radiation, Survival and Biological Outcomes” (MARSBOx).

Image of the MARSBOx in the stratosphere where it was used for recent microbe experiments.
Photo credit: NASA

With MARSBOx, the researchers were able to maintain a pressure similar to that in the Martian atmosphere and expose it to a gas mixture that was remarkably similar to the actual atmospheric composition on Mars. The pressure, temperature, radiation, and gaseous contents of the box all make a decent simulacra of what conditions would be like on the surface of Mars. As an additional control, the researchers designed the box to contain two separate chambers, including a shielded one, which they could use to isolate the effects of radiation on the microbes.

Of the various microbes, including bacteria and fungi, that were introduced into the environment, few survived. Black mold seemed to work particularly well in the harsh environment. This didn’t particularly surprise the scientists, as these robust mushrooms previously lived happily on the International Space Station.

Image of the black mold growing on the ISS.
Photo credit: NASA

Despite its ability to exist in the freezing temperatures and in the high-radiation environment of the stratosphere, even the black mold had to be “revived” once it was safely back on the ground. It is not yet clear what, if anything, could trigger this revival on the actual surface of Mars.

If scientists can actually figure out how to use microbes effectively on other worlds, it could be a great potential boon and cause for concern. Bacteria and other microbes are necessary for human biological functions. They also provide access to biochemical processes that would otherwise not be achievable in the cold, sterile environment of the red planet.

Other microbes have been tested to survive in Martian conditions, but have never been exposed to the stratospheric environment.
Photo credit: Maryland Astrobiological Consortium, NASA, STSci

This preliminary study shows how important it is for us to better understand the survival abilities of the microbes in our own world. If used correctly, they could prove to be a great boon to space travel. However, if used incorrectly, they can destroy any chance we have of understanding biogenesis on other worlds.

Learn more:
NASA – Life from Earth could temporarily survive on Mars
UT – Building a base on Mars with bacteria
UT – If there is underground water on Mars, where is it safe to land to avoid contamination?
SciTechDaily study shows that life from Earth could temporarily survive on Mars
Limits of microbiology – MARSBOx: Fungal and bacterial endurance of an analogue mission in a balloon in the stratosphere

Mission statement:
The MARSBOx is being prepared for launch in the Germany Aerospace Center.
Photo credit: DLR

Like this:

To like Loading…

Categories
Technology

Hey Millennials, cease ruining emoji for Gen Z.

When I saw the news that Apple was about to bring 217 new emojis to the world, I did what I always did: I asked my students what it meant to them. “We hardly use them anymore,” they scoffed. For them, many emojis are like over-excited dance moves at weddings: reserved for clumsy millennials. “And they are all misusing them anyway,” added my Gen Z cohort gravely.

My work focuses on how people use technology, and I’ve followed the rise of emoji for a decade. With 3,353 characters available and 5 billion characters sent daily, emojis are a major language system today.

When the emoji database is updated it usually reflects the demands of the time. For example, this latest update includes a new vaccine syringe and more same-sex couples.

But when my students have something to offer, emojis are also a battlefield of generations. Like skinny jeans and side parting, the “laughing, crying emoji,” better known as iet, fell into disrepute among young people in 2020 – just five years after it was voted Word of the Year 2015 in the Oxford Dictionaries. For Gen Z TikTok users, unsuspecting Millennials are responsible for rendering many emojis completely unusable – to the point that some in Gen Z barely use emojis anymore.

[Read: How do you build a pet-friendly gadget? We asked experts and animal owners]

Research can help explain these leggings about emojis. Because their meaning is interpreted by users who are not dictated from above, emojis have a long history of creative use and coded messaging. Apple’s 217 new emojis undergo the same creative process of interpretation: accepted, rejected, or used for other purposes by different generations, based on pop culture currents and digital trends.

Previously, the syringe emoji suggested drawing blood. The new, updated emoji is more like a vaccine. Apple / Emojipedia

Face the facts

When Shigetaka Kurita designed emojis in 1999, they were specifically intended for the Japanese market. But a little over a decade later, the Unicode Consortium, sometimes referred to as the “UN for Technology,” revealed these symbols to the entire world.

In 2011, Instagram tracked the ingestion of emojis through user messages and watched how 🙂 was eclipsed in just a few years :-). Old-style punctuated smileys now look just as dated on our LED screens as Shakespeare English: a mark of fogeyness in baby boomers (people born between 1946 and 1964) or an ironic throwback for Generation Z hipsters.

The Unicode Consortium now meets every year to review new types of emoji, including emojis that support inclusivity. In 2015, a new range of skin tones was added to existing emojis. In 2021, the Apple operating system update will include mixed and same-sex couples, and men and women with beards.

Bitter Boomers?

Not everyone was excited about the rise of the emoji. In 2018, a Daily Mail headline complained that “Emojis are ruining the English language,” citing research by Google that found 94% of respondents felt that English is deteriorating in part because of emoji use.

But such criticisms, sometimes voiced by boomers, tend to misinterpret emojis which, after all, are informal and talkative, not formal and oratory. Studies haven’t found any evidence that emojis have reduced overall literacy.

On the contrary, it seems that emojis actually improve our communication skills, including language acquisition. Studies have shown that emojis are an effective substitute for gestures in non-verbal communication and add a new dimension to text.

A 2013 study suggested that emojis connect to the area of ​​the brain associated with recognizing facial expressions and make a 😀 as nutritious as a human smile. Given these results, it is likely that those who reject emojis are actually impoverishing their language skills.

Creative criticism

The conflict between Gen Z and Millennials, meanwhile, arises from confused meanings. Although the Unicode Consortium has a definition for every symbol, including the 217 Apple to be released, they are often given new meanings in the wild. Many emojis have more than one meaning: a literal and a suggested meaning. Subversive, rebellious meanings are often created by young people: today’s Generation Z.

The eggplant 🍆 is a classic example of how the meaning of an innocent vegetable has been creatively reshaped by young people. The brain 🧠 is an emerging example of the emoji canon that has become innocent and dirty and which already has a large corpus.

Three emojis, one blowing out air, one with spiral eyes, one in cloudsThese three emojis will also hit iPhones with Apple’s latest update. Their meaning has yet to be decided. Emojipedia / Apple

And it doesn’t stop there. With Gen Z at the forefront of digital culture, the emoji encyclopedia is developing new ironic and sarcastic double meanings. It’s no wonder millennials can’t keep up and keep causing outrage among younger people who consider themselves highly emoji-literate.

Emojis remain powerful means of emotional and creative expression, even if some in Gen Z claim they have become obsolete through abuse. This new batch of 217 emojis will be used across generations and communities, each claiming different meanings and combinations. The stage is set for another round of intergenerational ridicule.The conversation

This article, by Mark Brill, lecturer at the School of Games, Film and Animation at Birmingham City University, is republished by The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Categories
Sport

LeBron James from Lakers replied to Zlatan Ibrahimovic: “There isn’t a method I might ever simply stick with the game.”

LeBron James returned to Zlatan Ibrahimovic on Friday after the soccer star quoted that James and other famous people should stay out of politics.

“There is no way I would just stick with the sport,” James told reporters after the Lakers defeated the Trail Blazers in Los Angeles. “Because I understand how this platform – how powerful my voice is.”

James said he was “preaching” on “inequality, social injustice, racism (and) systematic oppression of voters”.

LeBron responded after Zlatan Ibrahimovic criticized him for his activism.

“I’m a little wrong for doing my homework.” pic.twitter.com/VyKgBrYuiz

– SportsCenter (@SportsCenter) February 27, 2021

James was also proud that Renee Montgomery became a partner in the WNBA’s Atlanta Dream earlier in the day. He said asking her what would have happened “if I had shut up and just dripped”.

James said in January that he was interested in putting together a group to buy the franchise and oust co-owner Kelly Loeffler. Dream players fought Loeffler in the 2020 election cycle because of Loeffler’s stance as a US Senator. Republican Loeffler lost a runoff election on January 5th against Democratic challenger Raphael Warnock.

MORE: LeBron rips apart NBA’s plans to hold an all-star game

Ibrahimovic essentially told James and other people who have achieved fame to stay on in their footsteps.

“”[James] is phenomenal in what he does, but I don’t like it when people have status, they go and do politics at the same time, “AC Milan told Discovery + in Sweden.” Do what you are good at. Do the category you do. I play soccer because I play the best soccer.

“I don’t do politics. If I were a political politician, I would do politics. That is the first mistake people make when they become famous and have a certain status. Stay out of it. Just do what you do . ” best because it doesn’t look good. “

James, who is a partner in Premier League giant Liverpool, tried to turn the tables on Ibrahimovic by referring to the striker’s claim a few years ago that he himself was the target of racism in his Swedish homeland.

“It’s funny that he said because I believe in 2018 he was the same guy who said when he was back in Sweden to talk about the same thing because his last name wasn’t a specific last name that he believed Racism started when he was out on the square. Right? He said that, right? Yes. I thought he said that.

“I speak from a very educated mind. I’m a little wrong for doing my homework.”

James’ memory was slightly falsified. Ibrahimovic told a French interviewer in 2018 that the Swedish media practiced “latent racism” in their coverage of him because “they do not accept me as Ibrahimovic”.

“If another player made the same mistakes as me, they would defend him. If it is me, they don’t defend me. But it’s okay, it made me stronger,” Ibrahimovic was quoted as saying.

“I’m talking about racism. I’m not saying that it is alleged racism, but latent racism. That’s it, I’m sure. If my name was Svensson or Andersson or if I were blonde, they would defend me, even if they were I robbed a bank, “he added.

Goal material has been used in this report.

Categories
Entertainment

Meet Valuable Lee, the mannequin that’s altering the business with each effort

E! News: In October 2011, you shared one of your first posts on Instagram – a throwback photo of Donatella Versace with Mariah Carey and Beyoncé. How does it feel now, a decade later, not only to have stepped onto the Versace runway, but also to be a face of the Spring-Summer 2021 campaign?

Valuable Lee: Oh my God! Did you see that?! That was literally the first week of Instagram! UH-amazing! Well, I’ve always loved these women! What’s funny, I was the first curve model Queen Beyoncé used for her Ivy Park x Adidas collection in November. I also wrote a song for Mariah Carey when I was in high school. I wanted her to sing – yes, and I still have – and I’ve always loved how fab Donatella is and how glamorous House of Versace is. So, honestly, just wait for Mariah to call me any minute. I feel incredibly blessed and full of gratitude. Shooting for the Versace campaign with Mert and Marcus after the show was a dream come true. I have to go back and stare at the shot and runway often and literally scream like once a week. I really dreamed it. Manifestation on a trillion!

E !: What about the fashion industry that you wish someone told you when you started?

PL: Remember, you are your business and technically no one can run it better than you.

E !: Which of your favorite brands do you buy?

PL: I wear all kinds of brands. I’m also a huge advocate of buying what you like simply because you like it. I can make a beauty scarf cool – it’s how you wear it.

E !: After all these years modeling clothes and being on set, what are your top tips and tricks for putting together an outfit and making sure the clothes fit your body the best?

PL: Find out what you like best about your body and buy more things with the same silhouette. However, try different colors, textures, etc. You don’t have to follow every trend and frankly, if you are not comfortable tweaking the look! But do your best to get out of your comfort zone. You may like something new better than the tried and tested.

E !: What are the essential parts of your routine that you need to make it through in one piece when fashion month is back?

PL: Water, sleep, prayer, meditation, laughter, exercise.

E !: What’s next on your career bucket list?

PL: Make more premieres in fashion, film and television.

E !: When you look back on your career so far, which moment or success are you most proud of today? In your opinion, which milestone would 18-year-old Precious hear the most?

PL: Versace and a mega moment that I can talk about in a moment.

E !: What are the brands that you think people should pay more attention to? Why?

PL: Black ownership – because.

E !: What’s one item you think people should have in their closet by 2021?

PL: A mask! And color! 2020 was intense. More joy. More love.

(This interview has been edited and condensed for the sake of clarity.)